What do you think?
Rate this book
Biblical Doctrine: A Systematic Summary of Bible Truth
Long-Awaited Systematic Theology by Well-Known Pastor, Author, and President of the Master's Seminary Doctrine isn’t just for theologians―it’s important for every Christian because it shows us who God is and how we should live. Systematizing the robust theology that has undergirded John MacArthur’s well-known preaching ministry for decades, this overview of basic Christian doctrine covers topics such as God the Father, Jesus Christ, the Holy Spirit, the Bible, salvation, and more. Comprehensive in scope yet written to be accessible to the average reader―with non-technical vocabulary, minimal footnotes, and a helpful bibliography―this volume offers Christians a solid foundation for what they believe and why.
1024 pages, Hardcover
Published January 31, 2017
446 people are currently reading
875 people want to read
About the author
John F. MacArthur Jr.
1,344 books1,915 followersJohn F. MacArthur, Jr. was a United States Calvinistic evangelical writer and minister, noted for his radio program entitled Grace to You and as the editor of the Gold Medallion Book Award-winning MacArthur Study Bible. MacArthur was a fifth-generation pastor, a popular author and conference speaker, and served as pastor-teacher of Grace Community Church in Sun Valley, California beginning in 1969, as well as President of The Master’s College (and the related Master’s Seminary) in Santa Clarita, California.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 48 reviews
February 8, 2017
John F. MacArthur, Biblical Doctrine: A Systematic Summary of Bible Truth Wheaton: Crossway Books, 2017, 1,024 pp. $41.43
A theological tour de force. A magnum opus. A breath-taking panorama that leaves the reader in awe. These are only a few descriptions of Biblical Doctrine: A Systematic Summary of Bible Truth. by John MacArthur and Richard Mayhue.
The book is arranged as one might expect and is arranged according to the various branches of systematic theology:
Prolegomena
God’s Word: Bibliology
God the Father: Theology Proper
God the Son: Christology
God the Holy Spirit: Pneumatology
Man and Sin: Anthropology and Hamartiology
Salvation: Soteriology
Angels: Angelology
The Church: Ecclesiology
The Future: Eschatology
A comprehensive glossary is included which helps beginning students with cumbersome theological language. Also included is an excellent topical and Scriptural index for instant access to this treasure trove.
Each branch of theology is carefully explained and biblically defended. Opposing views are highlighted and refuted with grace and tact. MacArthur and Mayhue never leave the reader guessing. As such, there is never a hint of ambiguity here.
Several terms characterize Biblical Doctrine. These terms will either attract or repel readers, but will nonetheless provide a helpful template for evaluating the prospect of plopping down almost $50.00 for a book!
Biblical - This book is literally drowning in Scripture. Anyone familiar with MacArthur’s writing, in particular, will not be surprised to find a dogmatic edge. But dogmatism undergirded by humility and informed by Scripture is surely a path worth tracing out.
Evangelical - This book is guided by a commitment to the gospel. Look elsewhere for a pragmatic approach. Readers will be blessed by the relentless pursuit of Jesus and his glory.
Orthodox - This book is committed to historic orthodoxy, which is grounded by a literal, grammatical hermeneutic. Liberalism is soundly defeated and regegated to the ash heap.
Reformed- This book is informed by the infrastructure of the Reformers of the sixteenth century. Weaving throughout this volume is a commitment to grace alone, faith alone, Christ alone, Scripture alone, and to God alone be the glory.
John MacArthur helpfully sums up the essence of the Reformed faith:
“It is the marvel of marvels that the King of kings, whose glory is exalted above the heavens, should lift a finger to rescue even one of such vile traitors as the sons of Adam. Then to learn that this infinitely worthy King has purposed to redeem not one but countless multitudes at the cost of the life of his own dear Son bows the sinner’s heart in humble wonder.”
I cannot recommend Biblical Doctrine high enough. It is an outstanding addition to the growing number of books committed to teaching systematic theology. Students will be challenged and stretched; spiritual growth will no doubt occur as they pour over the many pages of this tome. But most significantly, their hearts and minds will be drawn to worship and glorify the Triune God. Soli Deo Gloria!
I received this book free from the publisher. I was not required to write a positive review.
A theological tour de force. A magnum opus. A breath-taking panorama that leaves the reader in awe. These are only a few descriptions of Biblical Doctrine: A Systematic Summary of Bible Truth. by John MacArthur and Richard Mayhue.
The book is arranged as one might expect and is arranged according to the various branches of systematic theology:
Prolegomena
God’s Word: Bibliology
God the Father: Theology Proper
God the Son: Christology
God the Holy Spirit: Pneumatology
Man and Sin: Anthropology and Hamartiology
Salvation: Soteriology
Angels: Angelology
The Church: Ecclesiology
The Future: Eschatology
A comprehensive glossary is included which helps beginning students with cumbersome theological language. Also included is an excellent topical and Scriptural index for instant access to this treasure trove.
Each branch of theology is carefully explained and biblically defended. Opposing views are highlighted and refuted with grace and tact. MacArthur and Mayhue never leave the reader guessing. As such, there is never a hint of ambiguity here.
Several terms characterize Biblical Doctrine. These terms will either attract or repel readers, but will nonetheless provide a helpful template for evaluating the prospect of plopping down almost $50.00 for a book!
Biblical - This book is literally drowning in Scripture. Anyone familiar with MacArthur’s writing, in particular, will not be surprised to find a dogmatic edge. But dogmatism undergirded by humility and informed by Scripture is surely a path worth tracing out.
Evangelical - This book is guided by a commitment to the gospel. Look elsewhere for a pragmatic approach. Readers will be blessed by the relentless pursuit of Jesus and his glory.
Orthodox - This book is committed to historic orthodoxy, which is grounded by a literal, grammatical hermeneutic. Liberalism is soundly defeated and regegated to the ash heap.
Reformed- This book is informed by the infrastructure of the Reformers of the sixteenth century. Weaving throughout this volume is a commitment to grace alone, faith alone, Christ alone, Scripture alone, and to God alone be the glory.
John MacArthur helpfully sums up the essence of the Reformed faith:
“It is the marvel of marvels that the King of kings, whose glory is exalted above the heavens, should lift a finger to rescue even one of such vile traitors as the sons of Adam. Then to learn that this infinitely worthy King has purposed to redeem not one but countless multitudes at the cost of the life of his own dear Son bows the sinner’s heart in humble wonder.”
I cannot recommend Biblical Doctrine high enough. It is an outstanding addition to the growing number of books committed to teaching systematic theology. Students will be challenged and stretched; spiritual growth will no doubt occur as they pour over the many pages of this tome. But most significantly, their hearts and minds will be drawn to worship and glorify the Triune God. Soli Deo Gloria!
I received this book free from the publisher. I was not required to write a positive review.
December 30, 2022
A systematic theology book by John MacArthur and Richard Mayhue is going to be a conservative approach study. Even if you don't agree with the dispensational eschatological perspective, the book is going to be orthodox and well-written.
There are no surprises here with maybe the exception that it appears that MacArthur's close relationship with Sproul and Ligonier Ministries may have rubbed off a bit more on his Soteriology (which I'm not going to complain about) but I wonder how much disagreement Mayhue had with MacArthur. MacArthur's name is going to be the one that most people will attribute the book to but there's more than enough Mayhue in here as well.
The layout of the book is sectioned into 10 different parts with the main focuses being on God, Man, Salvation, Spiritual entities, The Church, and the end. Each subsection is well-cited and covered. While this single-volume set isn't going to be able to cover all the areas or respond to all objections, the book is large enough to do some of that work. The one area that I thought was most lacking was the section on angels, demons, and spiritual entities. It was the briefest section and it seemed like the authors didn't want to go too far into speculation or possibilities. There weren't whole sections I would disagree with. Places here are there focus on one aspect without considering others. For example, in the discussion about natural theology, nature was described as not being enough because of the fallen nature of nature where the implication is that nature is fallen ontologically. While I don't believe the authors would agree with this if asked out of the blue, the context made the authors focus on the need for special revelation. But those areas of lacks or faults are few and far between.
What this systematic theology also does is it gives suggestions for further reading and also makes it easy for application, and I was able to take advantage of this with my pastor as a discussion meeting once a month per chapter. It was helpful to try and work on using the theology covered and in the structure of the book and turn it into personal application of my own sanctification process or applying the truth of God's Word to my life. There isn't a section called "Application" here so the onus is on the reader for this. But the "what do I do with this" is an easy enough question to ask per subsection.
For a single-volume systematic theology, I would recommend this and found it very thorough in its citation of Scripture and does a good job of balancing the topics. Final Grade - A-
There are no surprises here with maybe the exception that it appears that MacArthur's close relationship with Sproul and Ligonier Ministries may have rubbed off a bit more on his Soteriology (which I'm not going to complain about) but I wonder how much disagreement Mayhue had with MacArthur. MacArthur's name is going to be the one that most people will attribute the book to but there's more than enough Mayhue in here as well.
The layout of the book is sectioned into 10 different parts with the main focuses being on God, Man, Salvation, Spiritual entities, The Church, and the end. Each subsection is well-cited and covered. While this single-volume set isn't going to be able to cover all the areas or respond to all objections, the book is large enough to do some of that work. The one area that I thought was most lacking was the section on angels, demons, and spiritual entities. It was the briefest section and it seemed like the authors didn't want to go too far into speculation or possibilities. There weren't whole sections I would disagree with. Places here are there focus on one aspect without considering others. For example, in the discussion about natural theology, nature was described as not being enough because of the fallen nature of nature where the implication is that nature is fallen ontologically. While I don't believe the authors would agree with this if asked out of the blue, the context made the authors focus on the need for special revelation. But those areas of lacks or faults are few and far between.
What this systematic theology also does is it gives suggestions for further reading and also makes it easy for application, and I was able to take advantage of this with my pastor as a discussion meeting once a month per chapter. It was helpful to try and work on using the theology covered and in the structure of the book and turn it into personal application of my own sanctification process or applying the truth of God's Word to my life. There isn't a section called "Application" here so the onus is on the reader for this. But the "what do I do with this" is an easy enough question to ask per subsection.
For a single-volume systematic theology, I would recommend this and found it very thorough in its citation of Scripture and does a good job of balancing the topics. Final Grade - A-
July 22, 2021
This is quite a difficult volume to rate. It is a systematic theology text, but in many ways it is not a typical systematic theology text.
John MacArthur, Richard Mayhue and the other contributors approach the task of theology and summarizing Christian doctrine with customary conviction, clarity and certainty. The pursuit of clarity often leads to doxological expression as Bible truth is set forth simply to be understood and obeyed.
What comes with this approach is a rather narrow presentation of Christian theology. If a reader wants to understand how various perspectives are best represented then he may walk away disappointed. Often times opposing views are set up to be demolished and are glossed over. All the sections are also not of equal depth. This is a product of multiple authors contributing as well as the tendency not to produce fresh material, but rather republishing material available in books and articles that existed prior to the compilation of this volume.
An awareness of these limitations will enable a reader to gain as much value from it as possible. The book is packed with charts, tables and lists that makes accessing summary material quite easy. In this sense it is ideal for pastors and also laypeople.
If the reader agrees with the authors theologically, this may very well become an instant favorite. As for me, I will be making use of it, but not exclusively.
John MacArthur, Richard Mayhue and the other contributors approach the task of theology and summarizing Christian doctrine with customary conviction, clarity and certainty. The pursuit of clarity often leads to doxological expression as Bible truth is set forth simply to be understood and obeyed.
What comes with this approach is a rather narrow presentation of Christian theology. If a reader wants to understand how various perspectives are best represented then he may walk away disappointed. Often times opposing views are set up to be demolished and are glossed over. All the sections are also not of equal depth. This is a product of multiple authors contributing as well as the tendency not to produce fresh material, but rather republishing material available in books and articles that existed prior to the compilation of this volume.
An awareness of these limitations will enable a reader to gain as much value from it as possible. The book is packed with charts, tables and lists that makes accessing summary material quite easy. In this sense it is ideal for pastors and also laypeople.
If the reader agrees with the authors theologically, this may very well become an instant favorite. As for me, I will be making use of it, but not exclusively.
May 12, 2018
Absolutely breathtaking. My first MacArthur book (and unlikely to be my last).
MacArthur is a Calvinist who subscribes to the Futuristic Premillennialism view. Readers may wish to keep this at the back of their minds when navigating the book.
He tackles the following topics in a little under 1000 pages:
* Introduction (Prolegomena)
* God's Word (Bibliology)
* God the Father (Theology proper)
* God the Son (Christology)
* God the Holy Spirit (Pneumatology)
* Man (Anthropology) & Sin (Hamartiology)
* Salvation (Soteriology)
* Angels (Angelology)
* The Church (Ecclesiology)
* The Future (Eschatology)
Each chapter begins with a complementary hymn (e.g. "All Hail the Power of Jesus' Name" for the chapter on Christology, "The Church's One Foundation" in the chapter on Ecclesiology) and concludes with a sincere prayer reproduced verbatim from At the Throne of Grace: A Book of Prayers. This brings me to my next point.
Some reviewers have pointed out that the book is a collage of previously written material. I would be hard-pressed to disagree entirely. Parts of the book have been paraphrased from various sources, not least from material which MacArthur has previously written. However, for someone new to this field (the only other book on systematic theology I've read is John Frame's introductory Salvation Belongs to the Lord masterpiece), I've found this medley of "previously written material" to be immensely helpful to me for grasping the subject matter. It takes both skill and effort to organise these snippets as seamlessly as the author has done and I truly appreciate it.
MacArthur quotes Scripture extensively - so much so that the Scripture index itself is over fifty pages long! The reader would do well to check at least a couple of these references out to verify and appreciate how he masterfully elucidates why he believes what he believes. Understandably, for a book of this length, it is inevitable that the reader finds points of disagreement. Nonetheless, the author presents opposing views fairly before refuting them and asserting his own in a gracious, level-headed manner; there is always something to learn, something to broaden one's horizons, irrespective of the camp one belongs to.
===
Here are ten quotes from the book, one from each chapter (as you might imagine, it was extremely challenging picking just ten from the over five hundred I've highlighted):
===
TLDR: I heartily recommend this invaluable resource to the layman making a foray into systematic theology. Intermediate-level readers are also likely to benefit from the sheer breath and profundity of the topics covered. If one thirsts for more, one can peruse the thematic bibliographies inserted at the end of each chapter; the author has thoughtfully highlighted the more useful/recommended books from each list.
MacArthur is a Calvinist who subscribes to the Futuristic Premillennialism view. Readers may wish to keep this at the back of their minds when navigating the book.
He tackles the following topics in a little under 1000 pages:
* Introduction (Prolegomena)
* God's Word (Bibliology)
* God the Father (Theology proper)
* God the Son (Christology)
* God the Holy Spirit (Pneumatology)
* Man (Anthropology) & Sin (Hamartiology)
* Salvation (Soteriology)
* Angels (Angelology)
* The Church (Ecclesiology)
* The Future (Eschatology)
Each chapter begins with a complementary hymn (e.g. "All Hail the Power of Jesus' Name" for the chapter on Christology, "The Church's One Foundation" in the chapter on Ecclesiology) and concludes with a sincere prayer reproduced verbatim from At the Throne of Grace: A Book of Prayers. This brings me to my next point.
Some reviewers have pointed out that the book is a collage of previously written material. I would be hard-pressed to disagree entirely. Parts of the book have been paraphrased from various sources, not least from material which MacArthur has previously written. However, for someone new to this field (the only other book on systematic theology I've read is John Frame's introductory Salvation Belongs to the Lord masterpiece), I've found this medley of "previously written material" to be immensely helpful to me for grasping the subject matter. It takes both skill and effort to organise these snippets as seamlessly as the author has done and I truly appreciate it.
MacArthur quotes Scripture extensively - so much so that the Scripture index itself is over fifty pages long! The reader would do well to check at least a couple of these references out to verify and appreciate how he masterfully elucidates why he believes what he believes. Understandably, for a book of this length, it is inevitable that the reader finds points of disagreement. Nonetheless, the author presents opposing views fairly before refuting them and asserting his own in a gracious, level-headed manner; there is always something to learn, something to broaden one's horizons, irrespective of the camp one belongs to.
===
Here are ten quotes from the book, one from each chapter (as you might imagine, it was extremely challenging picking just ten from the over five hundred I've highlighted):
===
TLDR: I heartily recommend this invaluable resource to the layman making a foray into systematic theology. Intermediate-level readers are also likely to benefit from the sheer breath and profundity of the topics covered. If one thirsts for more, one can peruse the thematic bibliographies inserted at the end of each chapter; the author has thoughtfully highlighted the more useful/recommended books from each list.
January 20, 2023
I read this over a few years, so I don't remember some parts well. Overall, a good introduction to systematic theology. I did feel like it majored in some minors and other times gave little attention to important subjects.
December 23, 2025
For a long two years I have had this book, and while inconsistent at times while reading it, this year I diligently and effectively read and finished this book. While I wish I would have had it read sooner, I was blessed by taking the book slow and really trying to understand some of the rich theological topics that MacArthur depicted in this book that we may know God greater, which will draw us to greater worship of him.
I have and will continue to encourage readers who are interested in this book to do two different things. 1. To finish reading the whole bible before reading this, and to have read the New Testament multiple times before attacking this book. I say that because we want to have a good basis of theology from the bible, and a good understanding of the bible before reading such a rich book. We also as Paul washer says do not want to get our theology from a systematic, but instead we should get it from the bible. 2. That this book is meant to and should be read like a book, from front to back. I have heard from others that read this book bouncing from chapter to chapter, but I believe this misses some of the benefit of how the author intended us to read this book. John MacArthur organizes this book very well to discuss the infallibility of scripture to the study of God’s character, God the Son, God the Holy Spirit, Anthropology, Soteriology, Ecclesiology, and Eschatology. I believe it builds upon itself with every chapter, and you need to know the previous before knowing the later.
Biblical Doctrine is very rich, yet simple enough for people to read, understand, and love. I would encourage anyone to have this as their first systematic theology as it very much benefited me and encouraged me to live my life to the glory of God in proper worship of God. One of my favorite chapters was Soteriology, which was depicted very well from the author as I came out worshipful and understanding my salvation to a greater view than I already did.
I have and will continue to encourage readers who are interested in this book to do two different things. 1. To finish reading the whole bible before reading this, and to have read the New Testament multiple times before attacking this book. I say that because we want to have a good basis of theology from the bible, and a good understanding of the bible before reading such a rich book. We also as Paul washer says do not want to get our theology from a systematic, but instead we should get it from the bible. 2. That this book is meant to and should be read like a book, from front to back. I have heard from others that read this book bouncing from chapter to chapter, but I believe this misses some of the benefit of how the author intended us to read this book. John MacArthur organizes this book very well to discuss the infallibility of scripture to the study of God’s character, God the Son, God the Holy Spirit, Anthropology, Soteriology, Ecclesiology, and Eschatology. I believe it builds upon itself with every chapter, and you need to know the previous before knowing the later.
Biblical Doctrine is very rich, yet simple enough for people to read, understand, and love. I would encourage anyone to have this as their first systematic theology as it very much benefited me and encouraged me to live my life to the glory of God in proper worship of God. One of my favorite chapters was Soteriology, which was depicted very well from the author as I came out worshipful and understanding my salvation to a greater view than I already did.
February 16, 2017
As a pastor-teacher who has preached through every verse of every book in the New Testament at Grace Community Church, an accomplished author with over 150 books (and counting) including commentaries on every New Testament book, the editor of a popular study Bible, and the featured teacher of a worldwide radio and television program, it was no surprise that John MacArthur would finally write a book of systematic theology. And like his sermons, he holds nothing back in explaining theological concepts in a comprehensive, yet easy to understand manner. Covering everything from creation to eschatology, MacArthur presents each topic with sufficient Scriptural references, explanation of Greek lexicon, and occasional quotes from other well-respected theologians. It is quite a resource if you're interesting in diving into theology.
I must mention, however, that I would not consider this the most comprehensive resource on systematic theology. A "Summary of Bible Truth" describes this quite accurately; it has a distinct Calvinistic, Premillenial, Cessationist, Complementarian slant, characteristic of MacArthur's convictions, as well as those from Mayhue and the Master's Seminary. Discussion on differing interpretations is limited or absent altogether. One may want to include a systematic theology from someone like Wayne Grudem for a more complete view of a certain topic, as Grudem's Systematic Theology discusses contrasting views, even those he disagrees with.
However, I personally agree with 99% of the content of this book and think MacArthur does an excellent job explaining his perspectives, thoroughly backed by Scripture. I would wholeheartedly recommend this book to anyone wanting a solid introduction to theology.
I must mention, however, that I would not consider this the most comprehensive resource on systematic theology. A "Summary of Bible Truth" describes this quite accurately; it has a distinct Calvinistic, Premillenial, Cessationist, Complementarian slant, characteristic of MacArthur's convictions, as well as those from Mayhue and the Master's Seminary. Discussion on differing interpretations is limited or absent altogether. One may want to include a systematic theology from someone like Wayne Grudem for a more complete view of a certain topic, as Grudem's Systematic Theology discusses contrasting views, even those he disagrees with.
However, I personally agree with 99% of the content of this book and think MacArthur does an excellent job explaining his perspectives, thoroughly backed by Scripture. I would wholeheartedly recommend this book to anyone wanting a solid introduction to theology.
March 30, 2024
A great single-volume systematic. Though I do not agree doctrinally with MacArthur and Mayhue on everything (e.g. I am neither dispensational nor premillennial), their obvious care with, and reverence for, the scriptures results in a fabulous examination of them. This is a perfect buy for the serious Bible student who may not be too familiar with Systematic Theology and needs a good theological reference to set permanently and prominently on their desk. Having said that, the book is also easy to read straight through a chapter, neither delving too deeply into academic wheel-spinning, nor being content with the doctrinal atrophy in many churches of our day.
October 25, 2021
Review of MacArthur, John and Richard Mayhue, eds., Biblical Doctrine: A Systematic Summary of Bible Truth. Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2017.
This is a collaborative work of Masters seminary faculty edited by John MacArthur and Richard Mayhue. To evaluate this volume, I will first highlight the strengths of this book and then discuss in more detail a few representative chapters outlining the content and some critical evaluation.
Strengths of this textbook:
Practical application of the doctrines. A very important and distinct feature of this book is the emphasis on the application of the doctrine to the everyday life. For example, among other questions regarding doctrines, we read about: 1. How Systematic Theology relates to one’s worldview, mind, personal life and ministry? 2. Teaching and Preaching of Scripture; Obligation to Scripture and 3. Glorifying God. All these sections aim to provide guidance on how we can apply what we just learned.
Helpful Charts. To provide visual assistance in learning, the book has a number of useful chats or tables that summarizes and illustrates material discussed in the book.
Careful analysis of the biblical doctrines. This book covers all the standard systematic theology subjects in a comprehensive and yet concise form. The authors take very conservative or in their words “biblical” approach to the explanation of the doctrines.
To get a better understanding of this book we will look more carefully at the content of a few chapters and critically evaluate them.
Content of some chapters and some critical thoughts:
1. Introduction: Prolegomena. This chapter is very informative. It answers 14 questions regarding Theology in general and Systematic Theology in particular. Some of the questions are: What is Theology, and do we need to study it? What are the types of Theology? What is Systematic Theology and its categories? How does Systematic Theology relate to one’s worldview, mind, personal life and ministry? And many other questions. There are a few factors in my opinion that could be considered:
• It might be useful to supply Biblical references to the list of benefits of Systematic Theology (p.39) as it was done for the limits (p.40).
• The chapter could be shortened. For example, the quotation from James Leo Garrett Jr. on page 39 basically provides the same information as 7 points above of this quotation.
• Page 45 provides only the Protestant structure of the Old Testament. It would be beneficial to introduce the student to the Hebrew order as well.
• On page 62 one can find many interesting points which are supported with New Testament references. More Old Testament references may also be incorporated.
• In the Bibliography list I could not see a reference to David K. Clark, To Know and Love God: Method for Theology. Wheaton, Ill.: Crossway Books, 2003, which might be useful to the students since the whole book is dedicated to Prolegomena.
2. God’s Word: Bibliology. This chapter covers the following topics: Inspiration, Authority, Inerrancy, Preservation, Teaching and Preaching of Scripture and Obligation to Scripture. There are a few things in my opinion that might be improved:
• The material on page 81 repeat the same information which was already stated on page 78. There are also some other repetitions of previously stated information on page 87 about David as an author of Psalms.
• On page 82 we find the following statement: “The Gospel of Luke is the only one of the four that specifically identifies its author.” However, it seems to me, if I understand this statement correctly, that none of the Gospels mention the author. Therefore, the statement mentioned above needs some clarification.
3 God the Father: Theology Proper. This chapter concentrates on the nature and works of God the Father. It has also discussion on Trinity and the Problem of Evil and Theodicy. There are a few things in my opinion that might be improved:
• Some arguments appear to be logically weak. For example, authors state “Immanuel Kant also asserted a form of the moral argument, and he denied both the Trinity and the incarnation” (p. 149). It seems that the authors want to prove that the arguments for God’s existence are not much useful and do not bear good results as they did not lead Kant to the right doctrine. One might ask: “How his denial of Trinity and incarnation relates to his acceptance of the moral argument?” Someone may say that he read the Bible and denied Trinity… Does it mean that we should not read the Bible?
5 God the Holy Spirit: Pneumatology. In the beginning of this chapter authors discuss the questions regarding the Person of the Holy Spirit. A significant part of this chapter is dedicated to the Work of the Holy Spirit (Salvation; Sanctification; Service; Creation; Scripture; Prophetic Ministry). In the discussion on Sins against the Holy Spirit, the authors provide an important distinction as to how believers and unbelievers oppose the work of the Spirit.
• “Without the indwelling Holy Spirit, a person is not a true believer (Rom. 8:9; Jude 19). The six key passages discussing the Spirit’s indwelling believers include Romans 8:9, 11; 1 Corinthians 3:16; 6:19; Ephesians 2:22; and 2 Timothy 1:14. Taken in context, every use but one refers to believers as individuals.” (p. 367-368). This statement may benefit more explanation as these passages although might speak of individuals believers virtually always do it in the context of the whole church (these passages use plural pronouns).
• Page 384: There is some repeated information on the same page.
• “Faith (1 Cor. 12:9; 13:2): The divine enablement to trust God in all details of his work even when the outcome seems uncertain. This gift produces stellar assurance that God will accomplish his purposes.” (p. 385). Some scholars would argue that faith here is supernatural not just trust, and therefore a temporary gift.
• Distinguishing between spirits (1 Cor. 12:10) mentioned among both temporary (p. 384) and permanent (p.385) gifts. Which seems to be contradictory.
Conclusion
I find this book very informative and comprehensive. It can serve as a reference book on systematic theology or a textbook for a class. It should be commended for taking a relatively conservative approach and making a deliberate effort to be faithful to the Bible. You might disagree with some of the conclusions or think there are areas for improvement but do not let these things stop you from learning from this book.
This is a collaborative work of Masters seminary faculty edited by John MacArthur and Richard Mayhue. To evaluate this volume, I will first highlight the strengths of this book and then discuss in more detail a few representative chapters outlining the content and some critical evaluation.
Strengths of this textbook:
Practical application of the doctrines. A very important and distinct feature of this book is the emphasis on the application of the doctrine to the everyday life. For example, among other questions regarding doctrines, we read about: 1. How Systematic Theology relates to one’s worldview, mind, personal life and ministry? 2. Teaching and Preaching of Scripture; Obligation to Scripture and 3. Glorifying God. All these sections aim to provide guidance on how we can apply what we just learned.
Helpful Charts. To provide visual assistance in learning, the book has a number of useful chats or tables that summarizes and illustrates material discussed in the book.
Careful analysis of the biblical doctrines. This book covers all the standard systematic theology subjects in a comprehensive and yet concise form. The authors take very conservative or in their words “biblical” approach to the explanation of the doctrines.
To get a better understanding of this book we will look more carefully at the content of a few chapters and critically evaluate them.
Content of some chapters and some critical thoughts:
1. Introduction: Prolegomena. This chapter is very informative. It answers 14 questions regarding Theology in general and Systematic Theology in particular. Some of the questions are: What is Theology, and do we need to study it? What are the types of Theology? What is Systematic Theology and its categories? How does Systematic Theology relate to one’s worldview, mind, personal life and ministry? And many other questions. There are a few factors in my opinion that could be considered:
• It might be useful to supply Biblical references to the list of benefits of Systematic Theology (p.39) as it was done for the limits (p.40).
• The chapter could be shortened. For example, the quotation from James Leo Garrett Jr. on page 39 basically provides the same information as 7 points above of this quotation.
• Page 45 provides only the Protestant structure of the Old Testament. It would be beneficial to introduce the student to the Hebrew order as well.
• On page 62 one can find many interesting points which are supported with New Testament references. More Old Testament references may also be incorporated.
• In the Bibliography list I could not see a reference to David K. Clark, To Know and Love God: Method for Theology. Wheaton, Ill.: Crossway Books, 2003, which might be useful to the students since the whole book is dedicated to Prolegomena.
2. God’s Word: Bibliology. This chapter covers the following topics: Inspiration, Authority, Inerrancy, Preservation, Teaching and Preaching of Scripture and Obligation to Scripture. There are a few things in my opinion that might be improved:
• The material on page 81 repeat the same information which was already stated on page 78. There are also some other repetitions of previously stated information on page 87 about David as an author of Psalms.
• On page 82 we find the following statement: “The Gospel of Luke is the only one of the four that specifically identifies its author.” However, it seems to me, if I understand this statement correctly, that none of the Gospels mention the author. Therefore, the statement mentioned above needs some clarification.
3 God the Father: Theology Proper. This chapter concentrates on the nature and works of God the Father. It has also discussion on Trinity and the Problem of Evil and Theodicy. There are a few things in my opinion that might be improved:
• Some arguments appear to be logically weak. For example, authors state “Immanuel Kant also asserted a form of the moral argument, and he denied both the Trinity and the incarnation” (p. 149). It seems that the authors want to prove that the arguments for God’s existence are not much useful and do not bear good results as they did not lead Kant to the right doctrine. One might ask: “How his denial of Trinity and incarnation relates to his acceptance of the moral argument?” Someone may say that he read the Bible and denied Trinity… Does it mean that we should not read the Bible?
5 God the Holy Spirit: Pneumatology. In the beginning of this chapter authors discuss the questions regarding the Person of the Holy Spirit. A significant part of this chapter is dedicated to the Work of the Holy Spirit (Salvation; Sanctification; Service; Creation; Scripture; Prophetic Ministry). In the discussion on Sins against the Holy Spirit, the authors provide an important distinction as to how believers and unbelievers oppose the work of the Spirit.
• “Without the indwelling Holy Spirit, a person is not a true believer (Rom. 8:9; Jude 19). The six key passages discussing the Spirit’s indwelling believers include Romans 8:9, 11; 1 Corinthians 3:16; 6:19; Ephesians 2:22; and 2 Timothy 1:14. Taken in context, every use but one refers to believers as individuals.” (p. 367-368). This statement may benefit more explanation as these passages although might speak of individuals believers virtually always do it in the context of the whole church (these passages use plural pronouns).
• Page 384: There is some repeated information on the same page.
• “Faith (1 Cor. 12:9; 13:2): The divine enablement to trust God in all details of his work even when the outcome seems uncertain. This gift produces stellar assurance that God will accomplish his purposes.” (p. 385). Some scholars would argue that faith here is supernatural not just trust, and therefore a temporary gift.
• Distinguishing between spirits (1 Cor. 12:10) mentioned among both temporary (p. 384) and permanent (p.385) gifts. Which seems to be contradictory.
Conclusion
I find this book very informative and comprehensive. It can serve as a reference book on systematic theology or a textbook for a class. It should be commended for taking a relatively conservative approach and making a deliberate effort to be faithful to the Bible. You might disagree with some of the conclusions or think there are areas for improvement but do not let these things stop you from learning from this book.
February 17, 2024
This is my go-to book on systematic theology and the first one I usually recommend to people. It can be read either cover to cover or used as a reference. It is usually the first systematic theology book I will search after finishing exegetical work on a passage. At times, the rhetoric comes off as a bit standoffish, but overall the book is biblically solid and contains persuading arguments. Each page has an abundance of Scripture references that you can look up yourself to study further. They also include a few special features that can be especially helpful: an analytical outline, robust topic and Scripture indices, a list of tables (which are very helpful), a chart of all messianic prophecy, an appendix on the progress of revelation, and a glossary. This isn’t as scholarly as others (Grudem, Beeke, Wellum), but I find the information thoroughly helpful when preparing sermons and papers. My favorite sections in this book include those on baptism, spiritual gifts, salvation (which has trinitiarian outline with plan, accomplishment, and application of redemption), and cosmic eschatology.
October 29, 2019
And, twenty- five months after beginning, I’ve finished reading this systematic theology. I began reading it two weeks before the greatest trial of my life began, and that was no coincidence. It’s been a blessing and comfort in more ways than I can express. Use it as a daily devotional or study it in depth to know what you believe, either way, you will be blessed!
christianity
December 5, 2018Excellent systematic theology from arguably the greatest theologian/pastor of our time.
March 6, 2023
Best systematic I’ve read
May 11, 2017
Biblical Doctrine: A Systematic Summary of Bible Truth is edited by John MacArthur & Richard Mayhue and published by Crossway Publishing and is worthy of a spot on your shelf even if you shelving is as small as mine. At some point in the ministry of a great theologian they decide to write a systematic theology, which usually becomes their seminal work, in the case of MacArthur and the plethora of works phenomenal books he has already published it is hard to say wither this book is he seminal work or adding to his continued excellence in exegeting scripture.
Biblical Doctrine begins in a way that I have never seen a systematic theology begin. It begins with a hymn “Praise to the Lord, the Almighty”. The way this work begins sets the tone for the entire volume, inviting the reader to study scripture by worshiping God, and what better way to being worshiping God then by singing this stalwart hymn declaring praise to our Heavenly King. Furthermore this trend continues throughout the work always positioning the reader to keep their focus on God above all. Each hymn is specially chosen to draw the reader’s mind back to the worship of God, which is the purpose of theology. I have read more systematic theologies than I can count and have never encountered this stylistic approach, I hope it is the beginning of new trend in scholarship presentation.
While in many ways systematic theologies are the same, in how they go about the study of God, meaning the different categories (eg. Theology Proper, Eschatology, Christology, Ecclesiology, Pneumatology, Soteriology, anthropology, ect.) the depth that Biblical Doctrine goes it sensational. While Biblical Doctrine is not a long book, for a systematic theology in one volume, at 1024 pages, the sub topics that are explored are practical and timely. For instance I was quickly drawn in by the inclusion of a particularly useful and apt study on the topic of gender. Biblical Doctrine espouses how gender is something that is created and established by God and not by man, this argument goes to great lengths to prove this idea through scripture and its effects on marriage, procreation, and gender confusion.
While the depth of study that is contained in this volume can be cumbersome to certain readers, Biblical Doctrine is not meant to be read in one sitting. Rather it is to be paired with your personal or group study of scripture and can even be used for preparation in teaching the Bible. Biblical Doctrine therefore puts the focus not on itself but clearly on scripture, meaning that Sola Scriptura is not only highly valued in this work but is the foundation of it so that God can be glorified.
This book was provided to me free of charge from Crossway Publishing in exchange for an unbiased, honest review.
Biblical Doctrine: A Systematic Summary of Bible Truth
© 2017 Edited by John MacArthur & Richard Mayhue
Publisher: Crossway Publishing
Page Count: 1024 Pages
ISBN: 978-1433545917
Biblical Doctrine begins in a way that I have never seen a systematic theology begin. It begins with a hymn “Praise to the Lord, the Almighty”. The way this work begins sets the tone for the entire volume, inviting the reader to study scripture by worshiping God, and what better way to being worshiping God then by singing this stalwart hymn declaring praise to our Heavenly King. Furthermore this trend continues throughout the work always positioning the reader to keep their focus on God above all. Each hymn is specially chosen to draw the reader’s mind back to the worship of God, which is the purpose of theology. I have read more systematic theologies than I can count and have never encountered this stylistic approach, I hope it is the beginning of new trend in scholarship presentation.
While in many ways systematic theologies are the same, in how they go about the study of God, meaning the different categories (eg. Theology Proper, Eschatology, Christology, Ecclesiology, Pneumatology, Soteriology, anthropology, ect.) the depth that Biblical Doctrine goes it sensational. While Biblical Doctrine is not a long book, for a systematic theology in one volume, at 1024 pages, the sub topics that are explored are practical and timely. For instance I was quickly drawn in by the inclusion of a particularly useful and apt study on the topic of gender. Biblical Doctrine espouses how gender is something that is created and established by God and not by man, this argument goes to great lengths to prove this idea through scripture and its effects on marriage, procreation, and gender confusion.
While the depth of study that is contained in this volume can be cumbersome to certain readers, Biblical Doctrine is not meant to be read in one sitting. Rather it is to be paired with your personal or group study of scripture and can even be used for preparation in teaching the Bible. Biblical Doctrine therefore puts the focus not on itself but clearly on scripture, meaning that Sola Scriptura is not only highly valued in this work but is the foundation of it so that God can be glorified.
This book was provided to me free of charge from Crossway Publishing in exchange for an unbiased, honest review.
Biblical Doctrine: A Systematic Summary of Bible Truth
© 2017 Edited by John MacArthur & Richard Mayhue
Publisher: Crossway Publishing
Page Count: 1024 Pages
ISBN: 978-1433545917
October 11, 2025
This is a review of Biblical Doctrine: A Systematic Summary of Bible Truth, written by John MacArthur and Richard Mayhue.
Quoting Andrew David Naselli, “In addition to presenting orthodox theology common to historic Protestants, MacArthur and Mayhue defend an unusual combination of views that evangelicals debate, such as young-earth creationism, Calvinist soteriology, credobaptism, elder rule polity, complementarianism, cessationism, and traditional dispensationalism (or what they call futuristic premillennialism). They argue in a clear and orderly way that is worth engaging even if you disagree.”
The authors divided the chapter topics up, as Naselli says, in topics of orthodox theology:
1. Prolegomena
2. God’s Word: Bibliology
3. God the Father: Theology Proper
4. God the Son: Christology
5. God the Holy Spirit: Pneumatology
6. Man and Sin: Anthropology and Hamartiology
7. Salvation: Soteriology
8. Angels: Angelology
9. The Church: Ecclesiology
10. The Future: Eschatology
There is also a nice glossary and bibliography for diving deeper, if desired. Overall the content was well written, biblical, and for the most part, helpful.
Couple of quick comments on some of the content:
1. Chapter 8 on Angels, was over 70 pages. Although I found the content interesting, this subject matter could have been covered in half that size. In fact, don’t think I’ve ever encountered a chapter on the subject of Angels that was this large in any other Systematic.
2. Chapter 10, Eschatology, was almost 90 pages. While I do agree that this is an important subject, the chapter felt more like the authors were defending their positions, as opposed to disseminating information about the subject at hand.
3. Finally, I found the book to be somewhat wordy at times, and really creating more content than necessary. Refer back to the comment above on Eschatology, but there were other instances where it felt they went overboard on the subject, such as Reprobation in the chapter on Soteriology.
As a whole the book was well written and did give tons of detail (Bibliography) for further study, if desired. The few issues I’ve listed above should not drive anyone interested away from reading this book. I would highly recommend the volume to anyone who has an interest in the subject matter.
Saint Augustine - “Take Up and Read”
Quoting Andrew David Naselli, “In addition to presenting orthodox theology common to historic Protestants, MacArthur and Mayhue defend an unusual combination of views that evangelicals debate, such as young-earth creationism, Calvinist soteriology, credobaptism, elder rule polity, complementarianism, cessationism, and traditional dispensationalism (or what they call futuristic premillennialism). They argue in a clear and orderly way that is worth engaging even if you disagree.”
The authors divided the chapter topics up, as Naselli says, in topics of orthodox theology:
1. Prolegomena
2. God’s Word: Bibliology
3. God the Father: Theology Proper
4. God the Son: Christology
5. God the Holy Spirit: Pneumatology
6. Man and Sin: Anthropology and Hamartiology
7. Salvation: Soteriology
8. Angels: Angelology
9. The Church: Ecclesiology
10. The Future: Eschatology
There is also a nice glossary and bibliography for diving deeper, if desired. Overall the content was well written, biblical, and for the most part, helpful.
Couple of quick comments on some of the content:
1. Chapter 8 on Angels, was over 70 pages. Although I found the content interesting, this subject matter could have been covered in half that size. In fact, don’t think I’ve ever encountered a chapter on the subject of Angels that was this large in any other Systematic.
2. Chapter 10, Eschatology, was almost 90 pages. While I do agree that this is an important subject, the chapter felt more like the authors were defending their positions, as opposed to disseminating information about the subject at hand.
3. Finally, I found the book to be somewhat wordy at times, and really creating more content than necessary. Refer back to the comment above on Eschatology, but there were other instances where it felt they went overboard on the subject, such as Reprobation in the chapter on Soteriology.
As a whole the book was well written and did give tons of detail (Bibliography) for further study, if desired. The few issues I’ve listed above should not drive anyone interested away from reading this book. I would highly recommend the volume to anyone who has an interest in the subject matter.
Saint Augustine - “Take Up and Read”
June 18, 2020
TLDR: It's not going to become my go-to introductory teaching systematic (Grudem still wins), but is worth owning and using in sermon prep.
I read through this book from cover to cover in the course of leading a year-long study through it with a group of high schoolers. For which purpose - really any kind of systematic study introduction - I do not think I could recommend the book. One reason is the very significant amount of repetition between the chapters - large sections where the whole seems to be almost repeated, or the same topic is treated in a different way. Another reason is for the wide variety of genres used. In some places it reads like a sermon transcript (and indeed this is sometimes acknowledged). In other places the work is quite thorough and detailed and certain sections were among the best on their topic I've read. In other places, any attempt at discussion is abandoned and just an outline is provided, like that of an undergraduate survey course. In some places various views are considered and interacted with at varying levels of fairness, in other places this step is skipped and only one view is offered. The book reads like a referance folder of various writings with a similar perspective collected over some years, grouped generally by topic, and lightly edited, and I believe this is in fact what it is.
It is not clear that the book meets current standards for recognizing authors and citing sources. MacArthur and Mayhue are cited as "editors" not authors, but nowhere is there a list of contributors and while there are many footnotes about how another work has been "adapted," the issue of who wrote what is always veiled.
There is much valuable material in this book, and it is recommended less for reading through and more for referance when studying a specific topic - with this goal one would be sure to find much carefully considered and biblically edifying material. It has some uniqueness in the doctrines it combines and brings up some points some points to the table, perhaps notably in ecclesiology and eschatology, that are out of fashion but worthy of exegetical consideration. For these reasons it is a volume worth owning and using.
I read through this book from cover to cover in the course of leading a year-long study through it with a group of high schoolers. For which purpose - really any kind of systematic study introduction - I do not think I could recommend the book. One reason is the very significant amount of repetition between the chapters - large sections where the whole seems to be almost repeated, or the same topic is treated in a different way. Another reason is for the wide variety of genres used. In some places it reads like a sermon transcript (and indeed this is sometimes acknowledged). In other places the work is quite thorough and detailed and certain sections were among the best on their topic I've read. In other places, any attempt at discussion is abandoned and just an outline is provided, like that of an undergraduate survey course. In some places various views are considered and interacted with at varying levels of fairness, in other places this step is skipped and only one view is offered. The book reads like a referance folder of various writings with a similar perspective collected over some years, grouped generally by topic, and lightly edited, and I believe this is in fact what it is.
It is not clear that the book meets current standards for recognizing authors and citing sources. MacArthur and Mayhue are cited as "editors" not authors, but nowhere is there a list of contributors and while there are many footnotes about how another work has been "adapted," the issue of who wrote what is always veiled.
There is much valuable material in this book, and it is recommended less for reading through and more for referance when studying a specific topic - with this goal one would be sure to find much carefully considered and biblically edifying material. It has some uniqueness in the doctrines it combines and brings up some points some points to the table, perhaps notably in ecclesiology and eschatology, that are out of fashion but worthy of exegetical consideration. For these reasons it is a volume worth owning and using.
November 10, 2020
John MacArthur is a prolific writer and editor. His continuous ability to publish theological works is quite astonishing. In 2018 he released his own systematic theology with Crossway publishers.
Let me say at the outset, that I don’t agree wholeheartedly with MacArthur’s theological persuasion, and I’m more than positive he disagrees with my corner of the theological map. With that said, I have been a supporter of MacArthur’s works. I agree with his high view of God, Scripture, sin, Jesus Christ, and holiness. Biblical Doctrine allows him to further develop those ideas of which I agree, and to unpack his theological persuasions that I don’t agree with.
The most enjoyable part of this work was the Prolegomena, which is a Greek word for “prologue.” Most readers skip a book’s prologue and introduction and jump into the main contents. However, there is rich doctrine in MacArthur’s prologue in Biblical Doctrine. I thoroughly enjoyed MacArthur’s explanation of theology, and the reasoning for studying theology. For one to undertake reading such a large book as Biblical Doctrine (coming in a whopping 1,023 pages), you need to understand what theology is and why you should read and study it. Then you’ll need to know the differences between the various disciplines in theological study, which MacArthur explains succinctly.
Each section is broken down into smaller more digestible chapters covering a plethora of theological topics. Wayne Grudem’s Systematic Theology, in my opinion, is the most inviting and readable systematic theology available, while MacArthur’s Biblical Doctrine could be considered a close companion.
I’d highly recommend MacArthur’s Biblical Doctrine for those looking to familiarize themselves with theological studies. With that said, I’d be sure to have a solid footing of what you believe before undertaking the herculean task of reading MacArthur’s systematic theology and coming into contact with MacArthur’s flavor of Reformed Theology.
*Crossway Publishers graciously gave me a digital copy of MacArthur’s Biblical Doctrine: A Systematic Summary of Bible Truth for my honest review.
July 29, 2017
Students of theology or any believer will find in the christian bookstores, many systematic theologies. Some will be very deep and philosophical, others will address practical and less dense aspects.
This systematic theology written by MacArthur and Mayhue has characteristics that make it very interesting: a) abundant theological quotations, b) explanations of complex terms and c) accessibility for all readers.
MacArthur, shows a Calvinistic soteriology, a dispensational eschatology and a scriptural perspective of God and man. Students of other theological schools can find in this work a reference material, as well a work to contrast ideas.
The book is divided into 12 chapters:
God’s Word: Bibliology
God the Father: Theology Proper
God the Son: Christology
God the Holy Spirit: Pneumatology
Man and Sin: Anthropology and Hamartiology
Salvation: Soteriology
Angels: Angelology
The Church: Ecclesiology
The Future: Eschatology
Appendix
Basic Glossary
General Bibliography
In each section, we find biblical material to know more about God and the Scriptures.
MacArthur quotes Pastor John Dick, answering the question "Why study theology ?, one of these answers is: "To ascertain the character of God in its aspect toward us."
I received this book free from the publisher. I was not required to write a positive review.
This systematic theology written by MacArthur and Mayhue has characteristics that make it very interesting: a) abundant theological quotations, b) explanations of complex terms and c) accessibility for all readers.
MacArthur, shows a Calvinistic soteriology, a dispensational eschatology and a scriptural perspective of God and man. Students of other theological schools can find in this work a reference material, as well a work to contrast ideas.
The book is divided into 12 chapters:
God’s Word: Bibliology
God the Father: Theology Proper
God the Son: Christology
God the Holy Spirit: Pneumatology
Man and Sin: Anthropology and Hamartiology
Salvation: Soteriology
Angels: Angelology
The Church: Ecclesiology
The Future: Eschatology
Appendix
Basic Glossary
General Bibliography
In each section, we find biblical material to know more about God and the Scriptures.
MacArthur quotes Pastor John Dick, answering the question "Why study theology ?, one of these answers is: "To ascertain the character of God in its aspect toward us."
I received this book free from the publisher. I was not required to write a positive review.
April 30, 2019
Though most of the book is helpful, its main weakness is the unevenness in writing style and depth. I think this patchwork feel is a byproduct of being written by committee (the book has no attributed author, only two general editors). Some sections (e.g., angelology) lean heavily on outlines, bullet lists, and tables. Many portions are footnoted as excerpts from sections of books. These tend to be notably shallower than the surrounding context, and often seem like misfit discussions in a systematic theology. It even contradicts itself in places.
On the other hand, the book also includes some excerpts from blog posts by Mike Riccardi and Mike Vlach; these are relevant and helpful discussions, written at a depth appropriate for a systematic theology volume.
Some areas exhibit helpful discussions of opposing views, but often this is frustratingly absent. Sometimes other views are mentioned and represented, but without footnotes.
In my judgment, the foremost of several especially strong sections is that on the extent of the atonement (they defend particular atonement). The discussion is thorough, careful, well-documented, deals with opposing views, and treats relevant texts fairly exhaustively.
On the other hand, the book also includes some excerpts from blog posts by Mike Riccardi and Mike Vlach; these are relevant and helpful discussions, written at a depth appropriate for a systematic theology volume.
Some areas exhibit helpful discussions of opposing views, but often this is frustratingly absent. Sometimes other views are mentioned and represented, but without footnotes.
In my judgment, the foremost of several especially strong sections is that on the extent of the atonement (they defend particular atonement). The discussion is thorough, careful, well-documented, deals with opposing views, and treats relevant texts fairly exhaustively.
April 5, 2020
This book represents the culmination of a lifetime of study and contains a great depth of insight. It is a wonderful reference with a well-organized outline, full of helpful lists, charts, and Scripture citations. While these features are great, they did make the book less enjoyable to read cover to cover. Also, because the book was written by multiple authors and re-used a great deal of previously published material, it did not feel very cohesive, at times delving into far more detail than I felt was necessary. I also struggled with the overall dogmatic tone of the book. Disputed doctrinal positions were often presented as undeniable, and alternative viewpoints were often glossed over. Lastly, I lamented over some of the word studies that appeared throughout the book. Too many of them relied on literal meanings, drawing on etymology or the root components of words to derive meaning. These criticisms aside, I learned a great deal from this book. The treatment of futuristic premillennialism was clear and well-organized. Easily the best part of the book was the deeply trinitarian chapter on salvation. I found myself worshipping as I considered the distinct ways that each person of the godhead has worked to bring me salvation.
June 6, 2019
While clearly not a comprehensive Systematic Theology, MacArthur and Mayhue have done a great service by writing this. Certain things about this work are a bit strange (the repeated inclusion of etymological discussion on non-biblical terms, the strange formatting of some sections), others I disagree with (the rejection of many historically significant formal analytic defenses of the existence of God, which still prove useful in apologetics), it is a helpful introduction to the basic doctrines which define MacArthur's ministry and influence.
In comparison to other Systematic Theologies, Grudem's will probably remain as more useful to the learning Christian. I personally prefer his (so far - I'm still reading it) despite the greater number of disagreements I have with his beliefs. This Systematic Theology usually only presents the positions of the editors and rarely interacts with other major orthodox views, while Grudem is much more ready to list them and talk about his perceived strengths and weaknesses in each. As a learning Christian, I feel that Grudem's approach was more valuable to me in equipping me to interact with various views
In comparison to other Systematic Theologies, Grudem's will probably remain as more useful to the learning Christian. I personally prefer his (so far - I'm still reading it) despite the greater number of disagreements I have with his beliefs. This Systematic Theology usually only presents the positions of the editors and rarely interacts with other major orthodox views, while Grudem is much more ready to list them and talk about his perceived strengths and weaknesses in each. As a learning Christian, I feel that Grudem's approach was more valuable to me in equipping me to interact with various views
April 27, 2019
This is the first systematic theology that I have ever read, so take this review with a grain of salt. In typical MacArthur fashion, he wonderfully gives a systematic theology of every major Christian doctrine. This book has immensely blessed me and benefitted my overall theology.
I do wish that more about hermeneutics were included in this book though. Perhaps a comparison and contrasting of the two major camps of thinking. MacArthur is a bit of a mixed bag as far as categorizing his theology in general. Is he a dispensationalist? I would say for sure yes, however further details are difficult to discern. An explanation would have been nice if HIS beliefs regarding this.
Much of his perspective is incredibly helpful and biblically faithful. I highly recommend this systematic theology and cannot wait to read others to compare and contrast with.
I do wish that more about hermeneutics were included in this book though. Perhaps a comparison and contrasting of the two major camps of thinking. MacArthur is a bit of a mixed bag as far as categorizing his theology in general. Is he a dispensationalist? I would say for sure yes, however further details are difficult to discern. An explanation would have been nice if HIS beliefs regarding this.
Much of his perspective is incredibly helpful and biblically faithful. I highly recommend this systematic theology and cannot wait to read others to compare and contrast with.
April 17, 2025
4.5 The strength of this book is that it is thoroughly biblical. The authors use much Scripture to support their arguments, and they aren’t ashamed to say “the reason I believe this is the Bible plainly says it.” For that reason, I found myself agreement with the vast majority of their conclusions. Some chapters are better than others (for example, the chapter on Bibliology is excellent while the chapter on pneumatology is poor). My biggest critique is it’s very repetitive. It seems like the authors have cut everything they could from the MacArthur study Bible and Masters Seminary Journal and pasted it wherever it kinda connected. So when a topic comes up multiple times, a full explanation is given every time, sometimes in the exact same way. Overall though, I highly recommend.
August 12, 2017
Collage
Had high expectations about this book however it is clearly a collage of previously written material. It is more of a cathechism than anything else. It can be useful in my opinion as a reference for further study when one is approaching a subject.
The other main concern I have is that it almost always states a view as truth but does not provide any discussion about objections, therefore a student of this book remains ill prepared to discuss. Aquinas taught a better method.
Had high expectations about this book however it is clearly a collage of previously written material. It is more of a cathechism than anything else. It can be useful in my opinion as a reference for further study when one is approaching a subject.
The other main concern I have is that it almost always states a view as truth but does not provide any discussion about objections, therefore a student of this book remains ill prepared to discuss. Aquinas taught a better method.
June 17, 2020
This book is pretty helpful. It’s a good summary of a lot of what the Bible teaches.
Some sections I really enjoyed while others were more neutral, good but not particularly enlightening.
A point against this book are the editing mistakes, there are sentences and paragraphs that are repeats of previous sections, not just helpfully reviewing information but so close they really do seem like mistaken repeats.
There is also at least one place (in the church chapter, talking about pastors and elders) where the organization (heading above a certain section) confuse what they are trying to say.
Some sections I really enjoyed while others were more neutral, good but not particularly enlightening.
A point against this book are the editing mistakes, there are sentences and paragraphs that are repeats of previous sections, not just helpfully reviewing information but so close they really do seem like mistaken repeats.
There is also at least one place (in the church chapter, talking about pastors and elders) where the organization (heading above a certain section) confuse what they are trying to say.
November 19, 2020
Want a systematic theology that gives you rich teaching, and explains it in a way much less academic in its style, but doesn’t sacrifice thoroughness? This systematic theology was written for the average Christian who has no official Bible schooling in university or seminary, but is also good for the academic. This is an excellent source for Christians in all stages of their maturity. Probably the most enjoyable systematic theology to read.
October 9, 2023
Read cover-to-cover. For the JMac fundie this is literal crack cocaine.
+ points for good resource
- points for probably having a few brain rot takes. Haven’t read it in years but I probably disagree with some tertiary issues now
- points for: the curve is steep to being a conducive resource. Grudem has a simpler writing style while getting the same point across. JMac (or whoever wrote it) has a more elevated prose
+ points for good resource
- points for probably having a few brain rot takes. Haven’t read it in years but I probably disagree with some tertiary issues now
- points for: the curve is steep to being a conducive resource. Grudem has a simpler writing style while getting the same point across. JMac (or whoever wrote it) has a more elevated prose
May 4, 2021
This might a classic like the Institutes of the Christian Religion. He gives stacks of Bible verses on every corner, and explains things more thoroughly than others. He doesn't discuss extra-biblical covenants. He spends more time on the Holy Spirit and Angelology, which I enjoy. I say "he", but its probably more like a "they".
May 8, 2018
An accessible overview that also provides enough detail for extensive future study. I read through it all, but will need to return to several sections to revisit in much more detail, a valuable resource ongoing.
March 24, 2019
This is a clear presentation of the doctrines of Christianity. I agree with most of the book, however, the rose colored glasses of dispensational doctrine are very evident when he talks about baptism and end times. In these two areas he turns from being an exegete into an eisogete.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 48 reviews