Personal review for memory jog....
neo-Malthusian: not that the world will run out of food for its population (Malthus) but that the world will run out of everything....this book is an evolution from the radical "Population Bomb" by Paul Ehrlich, and is less extreme, less radical, and tries to be more reasonable.
Central tenets:
1. Overpopulation (and growing) for finite resources of the planet
2. Over-consumption far exceeding needs
3. Large imbalances among the population in power, wealth, consumption, access
Some critical aspects:
- birth rates correlates to women's access to equity in education, birth control, wealth, power
- corporations given standing as individuals but permitted to put profit and shareholders first
- globalization and specialization are poor policies for maintaining the ecology of the planet
- pricing or taxation to include downstream effects of production of goods and services
It is relatively easy to find examples of excess in everything they examine, from the media0cracy invention of the banana and palm oil leading to deforestation, to the lies of the LBJ and Bush administrations in Vietnam, Iraq, to the fundamental economic observation that the many many poor work to make the small number of rich, richer. It is harder to find solutions.
In this area, Ehrlich's look to representative democracy as in the USA (the only superpower), and look to regulatory agencies within and internationally to put in place not just guidance and constraints, but directives that will result in lower carbon, lower inequity, lower birthrate, lower excesses in consumerism and consumption.
This was all written before Trump. The Ehrlich's even talk about kleptocracy, which is government by theft, but what they did not sound the alarm on, is that regulations entrenched in bureaucracy are double-edged swords....if they define what is not permissible, everything else is, and all the agencies can be diluted, distorted and corrupted, as we have seen, to other ends.
Their glimmer of hope was Martin Luther King's "I have a dream" speech, in that there are persons of vision and purpose. I think this is not sufficient.
The recent Nobel Summit on the Planet was populated by the power representatives of the environmental save the Earth within the existing systems - thus, HBC, Al Gore, any number of NGOs....but all I heard was "blah blah"..... lots of projects, grants, financing to create better situations in Latin America, sub-Sahara....
BUT, the major problems of corporate profit that does not include the ethics of global downstream effects;
the major problems of cultural drives (media, lobbying) to over-consume - cars, cosmetics, housing, tech toys, foods, wine collections, recreation, travel
the globalization of the good life as a single movie
the promotion of the individual with absolute rights rather than social contracts
these need to be in the consciousness of those who truly want to, and have the power to, reform where we are going so that we have some place to get to that is not hell....