With the dysgeusia and parosmia in the household, I needed to add to my skimpy supply of vegetarian recipes, and when I saw this book on sale a second-hand store, I thought I'd give it a try.
This cookbook has many more recipes than the other vegetarian cookbook, Susan Gardner's "The Vegetarian Kitchen" had. It also seems to have much more information about being a vegetarian and various aspects of health, including protein concerns, which was my new (temporary ?) vegetarian's concern, as well as some helpful tips on calcium, which included some of my concerns.
However, "Vegetarian Times" talks about margarine being worse for cholesterol than butter. We went down the path of switching to butter some years ago, which resulted in a spike in two family members' cholesterol levels, which returned to normal when we returned to margarine. That made me skeptical of the other health benefits listed in this book. Nonetheless, I have a feeling that most of them are probably true. Still ... it made me cringe. It was published in 1995, so it might be dated.
Another reviewer complained that the information on gluten in it was outdated as well, so be careful if that's of interest to you.
My biggest complaint about this book is the long amount of preparation time for the food. I don't have time for all that, day in and day out, even if I cook and double it for leftovers. There was a small chapter about recipes that would be ready in "under 30 minutes." However, there's only one recipe from that section that we could use because of other limitations on our foods - soy and apple allergies, etc. That soy allergy alone is a huge reason to skip vast swaths of this book with tofu or soy sauce, etc. So I realize that part of the "fault" is ours in our needed, added restrictions.
My second biggest complaint is that there were many ingredients which would be hard to find. I wish they'd either used simpler ingredients or listed possible substitutions. I realize that there was a section in the back about various businesses that would ship ingredients to you. I suppose I'm sluggish to do all that. I'd rather just pick it up at the grocery store, especially where I can see the quality of the produce I'm getting.
Eh, my last complaint isn't really a complaint. It's more of a preference. It would've been nicer if they'd had pictures to show the finished results of the recipes and how appetizing they looked. It's not necessary. I'd try them anyway. But pictures can be an added encouragement. I suspect they ran out of room when they decided to put all the health reasons in the early chapters of the book.
One friend of mine only wants cookbooks that have recipes for one or two people, not crowds of people, and I didn't see many recipes for a small number of people here. The minimum was four people, which, actually, is a little too small for me, but I can always double recipes and often do.
Still, throughout the rest of the book, there were enough interesting recipes for variety that I might keep this book. Most cookbooks I buy I glean a few recipes from and then hand the book over to a friend in a sort of book-exchange. The key to eating vegetarian, according to this book, was variety, and it certainly had that.
There was a probably-unnecessary dessert section. (Who puts meat in dessert? Even mince meat pie, I've learned, doesn't really use meat.) But, there were many fruit desserts with only mildly sweet use of various forms of sugar (brown, maple, honey, etc) that I suspect they would be good additions to either Weight Watchers (low points) or diabetic dessert recipes. At least, they would be worth trying. In the case of Weight Watchers, I could enter the recipes on the app and find out how "expensive" they are in terms of WW points.
One reviewer appreciated the wide variety of cuisines and cultures represented in this book. Definitely an added plus.
I know that this cookbook favors more grains which would also be costly in the WW app, but one would probably have the extra points for it if one wasn't consuming meat. Still, like anything else, it's a balance.
If I find cooking these recipes easier than I suspect, I might raise the rating to a 4 just for that purpose alone. Or lower it, I suppose, if I find we don't like these. One other reviewer said they'd used this cookbook and enjoyed it for over a decade (high praise!) but another reviewer had tried a handful of different recipes mostly with poor results and had to dump one down the drain. I appreciate the warning. It makes it sound a little daunting.