The first half feels like it generalizes just trying to reach the second half, which helpfully tries to explain what the book actually means about ethics, although as a reader I was never really convinced it understood its own point. The second half is case scenarios, and they’re not thought out very well. One case tries to explain the concept via coworker relations, but becomes confused when it explains that the first coworker immediately presses the issue (at the second incident) and somehow the situation doesn’t improve. Well, I can come up with an alternative explanation for that. The authors can’t, however. Two other scenarios attempt to explain how school learning automatically trumps practical experience. One suggests a system that is clearly not broken somehow is absolutely broken. Another is a laughably obvious example of a broken system that actually simulates a lot of what classrooms are always trying to suggest. Other scenarios are obvious and don’t really bring up ethical problems, or how to solve them. It’s a frustratingly unhelpful book and doesn’t get into how a failing system fails early childhood educators much more than just about any imagined ethical scenario. Fortunately the next book I started in the subject field is about leadership. A lot of these books are almost entirely useless in the vacuums they imagine. They keep missing the point. Leadership seems like a good way to overcome that.