Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Abstract Algebra: An Introduction

Rate this book
Great textbook for an introduction to abstract algebra.

620 pages, Paperback

First published January 1, 1990

Loading...
Loading...

About the author

Thomas W. Hungerford

110 books6 followers

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
23 (24%)
4 stars
42 (45%)
3 stars
18 (19%)
2 stars
7 (7%)
1 star
3 (3%)
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 reviews
124 reviews16 followers
August 21, 2009
See my critical review of Gallian's algebra book. It all pretty much applies here too, but possibly even more so.

My impression (possibly wrong) is that this book is intended to present abstract algebra to weaker students, or to students at an earlier stage than would normally see this material. Fine. But if, as seems to be the case, the students never see how the material can be applied to an interesting problem, what was the point?

In any case, no one should pay the $187 this book sells for.
4 reviews
March 10, 2018
A very thorough book in the sense that almost every proof is rich in detail. It is clear that the book can be read by students with very little background knowledge of how to construct proofs in mathematics. The exercise range from routine questions which test your understanding of definitions and theorems to the quite difficult ones which may take a while to solve.
165 reviews
June 18, 2024
6.4/10 Perfectly adequate. Too verbose for my taste and a bit too basic, but fine. The decision to make the de facto order be rings -> groups -> fields is bizarre, but the choose-your-own-adventure structure makes up for that I guess.
Profile Image for Fatima.
452 reviews2 followers
September 12, 2019
If you're new to this and you need step by step proofs then this book is perfect.
Profile Image for Mason Doyle.
25 reviews
Read
December 20, 2024
Taught this in my Introduction to Abstract Algebra course. It was okay. Not a fan of how he starts with rings and then goes to groups. I had to change that order in my teaching, and then consequently had to change how he introduced groups. The example problems were very good and the proofs were very detailed. Not perfect, but good.
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 reviews