I was first introduced to Chris McChesney two years ago at the Global Leadership Summit. His talk on The 4 Disciplines of Execution whet my appetite for the book he and his colleagues Covey and Huling wrote. The book does not disappoint. They promise that these four executions will improve the performance of any individual or team. The disciplines are focus, leverage, engagement, and accountability. While none of these disciplines will strike the reader as novel, it is zeroing in on these specific disciplines relentlessly that is the key.
Discipline 1 is to focus on wildly important goals. Similar to essentialist doctrines, the most important part of this discipline is the determination of what is, in fact, wildly important for oneself. The authors aver, “You might find it hard to let go of a lot of good goals until you start serving a greater goal.” They say that the research proves that, surprisingly, “only one employee in seven could name even one of their organization’s most important goals.” Our organizations are not naturally places that diffuse goals, they do not naturally zero in on a goal. “Many teams have multiple goals—sometimes dozens, all of which are priority one. Of course, that means that nothing is priority one.”
Discipline 2 is to leverage your lead measures. Much research has shown that focusing on lead, instead of lag measures nets significantly better results. For instance, focusing on the lead measures of caloric intake and exercise will net much better health results than the lag measure of weight loss.
Discipline 3 is have employees keep score in order to boost engagement. The authors say that a simple, visible scoreboard with essentials has a dramatic effect in results. “The only reason you fight a battle is to win the war.” The authors tell us that, “A staggering 81 percent of the people surveyed said they were not held accountable for regular progress”
Discipline 4 is accountability. None of the other disciplines is worth much without systems and structures of individual and team accountability. “The secret to Discipline 4, in addition to the repeated cadence,” the authors share, “is that team members create their own commitments.”
If the book was a description of the disciplines, it wouldn’t be nearly as valuable as it is. Every discipline, taken by itself, has been written about elsewhere. But the book is about how to use those four disciplines as a system. When you use them together, you get a positive synergy. Any one of the four will improve your results. Using the four all together will improve your results dramatically.
I’ve begun to try to implement the system to varying degrees of success. I’ve done significant work in the past on discipline 1 (focusing on wildly important goals) and discipline 4 (accountability). The book helped me be more thoughtful about discipline 2 (leveraging my lead measures), but I’ve done little in the realm of keeping score.
I’m hopeful to go through the book again with our Executive Leadership Team in the coming year—doing so I think will both challenge and improve my own disciplines and help us to implement those disciplines collectively.
What is most difficult in The 4 Disciplines of Execution is not the concept, but the implementation. I know I have many bad habits that are a detriment to myself and my teams and returning to this book more than once I’m sure will be necessary. “While every one of the disciplines has value, their real power is in how they work together in sequence.”
Like so many things, what is easy is not what is best. Discipline is difficult, but ultimately rewarding. We are, after all, to be disciples of Jesus himself. May all of my life: personal, physical, spiritual, and vocational, be improved by the practices of disciplines.