Lo straniamento all'interno delle pareti domestiche ha una lunga storia. Sensazioni di sottile o di opprimente inquietudine direttamente innestate nel cuore della normalità quotidiana hanno accompagnato l'esperienza umana da sempre.Scrittori come E.T.A. Hoffmann e Poe ne hanno fatto il tema di straordinari romanzi e racconti. Freud ne ha trattato dal punto di vista psicoanalitico. Anthony Vidler, in questo libro pubblicato nel 1992 e divenuto da allora un imprescindibile punto di riferimento per il dibattito critico e teorico, analizza gli effetti dell'azione del perturbante sull'architettura a partire dalla fine del Settecento, epoca in cui l'angoscia e lo spaesamento moderni hanno incominciato a divenire operanti. Ma è soprattutto ai nostri giorni che il perturbante non soltanto ha assunto il ruolo di fondamentale metafora di una generalizzata condizione d'invivibilità ma è entrato addirittura a far parte della strumentazione linguistica del progettista. Attraverso la raffinata lettura che Vidler ne compie, i progetti e le opere di alcuni tra i piú noti architetti contemporanei - Peter Eisenman, Rem Koolhaas, Bernard Tschumi, John Hejduk, Coop Himmelblau, Elisabeth Diller e Ricardo Scofidio - mostrano un volto del tutto diverso da quello disimpegnato e ottimistico che solitamente appare: deformazioni, smembramenti, rotture, ben piú che brillanti invenzioni stilistiche, risultano essere lo specchio infranto in cui si riflettono, in modo piú o meno consapevole, la perdita di radicamento e l'angoscia oggi dominanti nel mondo.
Anthony Vidler (4 July 1941 – 19 October 2023) was an English architectural historian and critic. He was Professor at the Irwin S. Chanin School of Architecture at The Cooper Union.
I was lucky to be reading this while I was working in Iceland, living near an abandoned village. The main theme is the psychology of a place, or house- and reminded me of the book Landscapes of Fear by Yi Fu Tuan. It's about feeling scared by buildings. New and old.
This book is both interesting and accessible. The first chapters relate to the more conventional history of the Uncanny, whilst the later chapters head into vagabond/cyborg territory, and the ‘uncanny’ nature of architecture becomes potentially more interesting, but also, perhaps, more tenuous.
There is a detailed chapter on Tschumi’s Parc de la Villette in Paris, (which is why I read the book), but overall many of the examples are philosophical, psychoanalytical, literary or art-based rather than specific architectural examples.
Lastly, the photos that were included were very evocative, but not entirely self-explanatory, a few more relating to the art and architecture he refers to would have been useful. Overall, a thought-provoking read.
The first and second sections are quite strong in emphasising forms and conditions of the "uncanny" in architectural spaces, but fails to be consistent in its themes in the third section, until the last chapter, which seems to recoil within discussions of anxiety rather than ending with the uncanny again. But there are very good literature on classic view of architectural spaces in philosophy, literary studies, and spatial studies that frame the analyses on how architecture can inject fear and dread.
Forget the first section--- the final two parts are well done: considerations of how architecture tries to evoke emotional states and how architecture has been done to create a sense of the "uncanny", to unsettle viewers and make them acknowledge social, political, and cultural contradictions. Good focus on the early work of Coop Himmelblau. Alas-- poorly illustrated, with little visual sense of what uncanny architecture looks like.
I bought this book because I thought it was about architecture (The art and science of designing and erecting buildings.) There was a lot of philosophy and literature and a little psychology but I was hard pressed to find any architecture. There were very few illustrations and they were largely unrelated to the text.
Vintage Vidler. Dense, perceptive and argued with vigor. For me, the emphasis on the psychological approach to knowing eclipsed other modes of knowledge. But, when you talk about the uncanny, I suppose you end up with Freud, and when you end up with Freud, it's gonna get all psychological.
Four stars for incongruity. But an honourable five stars if you want to attribute it it. Proper architectural writing and an encompassing singular vision.