Die Vorlesung über »Philosophie und Soziologie« aus dem Sommersemester 1960 ist die erste, die Theodor W. Adorno explizit auch der Soziologie gewidmet hat. Anhand einer ideen- und geistesgeschichtlichen Untersuchung wird der Zusammenhang von Wahrheit und gesellschaftlicher Erkenntnis dargelegt. Dies geschieht stets unter der zentralen Prämisse, »daß es überhaupt kein Theorem gibt, ganz gleich, welcher Art es auch sei, dessen Funktion innerhalb der Gesellschaft schlechterdings von der geschichtlichen und gesellschaftlichen Lage unabhängig ist. Es gibt keine Wahrheit, die nicht zur Ideologie mißbraucht werden kann, es gibt kein Theorem, das nicht unmittelbar in den Dienst des Gegenteils dessen gestellt werden kann, was es selber behauptet«. Diese programmatische Erkenntnis weist der Vorlesung nicht nur den Status einer zeitlosen philosophischen Propädeutik in die Soziologie zu. Sie kann auch als Einführung in die Kritische Theorie gelesen werden, deren soziologischen Gehalt Adorno hier erstmalig detailliert erläutert.
Theodor Wiesengrund Adorno was one of the most important philosophers and social critics in Germany after World War II. Although less well known among anglophone philosophers than his contemporary Hans-Georg Gadamer, Adorno had even greater influence on scholars and intellectuals in postwar Germany. In the 1960s he was the most prominent challenger to both Sir Karl Popper's philosophy of science and Martin Heidegger's philosophy of existence. Jürgen Habermas, Germany's foremost social philosopher after 1970, was Adorno's student and assistant. The scope of Adorno's influence stems from the interdisciplinary character of his research and of the Frankfurt School to which he belonged. It also stems from the thoroughness with which he examined Western philosophical traditions, especially from Kant onward, and the radicalness to his critique of contemporary Western society. He was a seminal social philosopher and a leading member of the first generation of Critical Theory.
Unreliable translations hampered the initial reception of Adorno's published work in English speaking countries. Since the 1990s, however, better translations have appeared, along with newly translated lectures and other posthumous works that are still being published. These materials not only facilitate an emerging assessment of his work in epistemology and ethics but also strengthen an already advanced reception of his work in aesthetics and cultural theory.
Adorno offers 18 lectures dedicated to the topic of Philosophy and Sociology, in which he runs through the history of sociology as a science, its role as a revolutionary science of the emerging bourgeois class, and its dialectical becoming the ideological defender of an oppressive system through the embrace of nominalism. Adorno counterposes this history to that of philosophy and its dedication to the concept, its production and its truth value, arguing that though the two sciences stand in opposition to one another, each presupposes the other in and through mediation, a process of dialectic thinking which is anything but the reduction of the opposition to a third. Adorno's lectures veer into an extended meditation on ideology, generation and validity only to return to the principle thesis that truth and history, however they are framed, yield a dialectical mediation in which their opposition is intertwined.
"Philosophie und Soziologie" are a series of lectures by philosopher, sociologist and seems so much more in its wikipedia entry, Theodor W. Adorno, a person that will surely pop up in your reading material if you do any kind of research in sociological stuff (raising my hand). And what can be said about these transcribed lectures were he analyzes the relationship (or head-on fight) between philosophy and sociology?
Well, it is an interesting book, with some eye-opening passages, and some good analysis. However, it is, at the same time, a transcription of some lectures, with the difficulties this brings to the reader when this book falls on their hands: too long paragraphs, things that may be easier to understand in the lecture's context but that are hard to on the white pages; some repetition; lack of knowledge of some of the topics/people that keep popping up but that the students of Adorno's class surely knew of...
That does not mean that the book is worthless, but that it is more of a curio and an 'extra' for people who already know of the matter at hand and just want to get some extra information on the topic or on Adorno's views on it.
The best: a look on Adorno's mind and his lectures; some passages, particularly in the latter lectures, are really interesting
The worst: to be on those lectures transcribed here would have been better, for sure; some of the chapters are difficult to understand in the vacuum of this book; I may be pedantic, by I kind of hate the use of the word 'chance' in Spanish (so much of a Spanglish word and I feel so out of place here in this translation...)
Further Reading: take a look on how the brain works ("The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat" by Oliver Sacks); check the dystopian novel Adorno talks about in his lectures ("Brave New World" by Aldous Huxley); think about language and its role ("Language, Bananas & Bonobos", Neil Smith) or take a look on what is reality ("Über Gewißheit" by Ludwig Wittgenstein)... The list could be endless, the desire for knowledge, boundless.