I have mixed feelings about this book. Certainly the people it profiles are remarkable courageous, all of them heroes in one way or another. And many of their stories are compelling. I'm also pleased to see that the stories of some people of color are highlighted, as well as the stories of how they were often not awarded their medals until many years later. But. One, I feel like this book--despite a few rather weak attempts to the contrary--glorifies war. It seems to suggest that war is what makes heroes, and in many of the stories, the men profiled talk about how the army gave them a purpose and how their experiences in war shaped them into confident, successful citizens. This may well be true . . . but I wish there were more discussion about the horrible cost of war. Certainly many of the men talk about the sadness of losing buddies, etc., but on balance, it just doesn't sit right with me. Also, the book was supposed to also feature civilian heroes, but it is wayyyyy skewed toward war heroes. In the civilian heroes section, some of the featured heroes have a military past, or the situation still occurs during a war. And because the Congressional Medal of Honor (which all of the featured military heroes in the book received) can only be awarded to those involved directly in combat, all of the war heroes featured are men. Only one woman ever received the congressional medal of honor, and she was not in the book (which I think is a major oversight). Only one woman is featured in the entire book (in the civilian section). This is a PA choice book for 2017-18.