Begins well, like a a defence of the reformed faith, but then continues to quote Bruce Cockburn a bit too much and dates itself by railing against the Fukuyama report for the majority of the book—becomes an academic paper instead of a call to action, as it began.
Walsh argues that a Christian’s worldview ought to make a difference in the way she lives, yet generally, it doesn’t—there is gap between what we believe and what we do. Christians hold that religion influences every aspect of life, yet they still live dualistically because “this God wants too much” and dualism is “a safe place” (30). In this way, we are like schizophrenics who feel secure and fear healing (31).
“If Christians, all of their idiosyncratic religious doctrines notwithstanding, really do construct reality in pretty much the same terms as everybody else, if, in fact, they relate to immigrants, single mothers, the poor, the handicapped and anyone else who is who is ‘different’ with neither more nor less compassion than others; and if they really do experience social, emotional and economic well-being in the same terms as everyone else in our culture—then we are faced as a church and as individual Christians with a spiritual crisis of mammoth proportions” (28)
The church has become “enculturated” in how our “consciousness, our imagination, our vision has been captured by idolatrous perceptions and ways of life. The dominant worldview […] has captured our lives” (29).
“You see, while we were fighting with each other about evolution, the infallibility of the Bible, spiritual gifts, and various other hotly debated issues, we were falling into a deeper and deeper sleep in relation to the cultural captivity of our very consciousness” (29)
Take capitalism. A basic tenet of the world which Christians generally buy into. That the point of work (life) is to make money, acquire goods, and earn enough leisure time to enjoy them. Christianity is subversive, says Walsh, because it holds that work is good in and of itself and “more and more consumer goods and services is not necessarily good” (14).
“Insisting that work is an integral dimension of human life, that it is a form of worship, that it is meant to ennoble humankind, that is should be dedicated to serving one’s neighbour and the stewardly care of the creation—all of these are subversive ideas” (14)
Walsh hunts for the roots and says the danger of the reformed mindset is an intellectualisation which has left us “open to the enculturation of [our] imagination” (32).
We can’t imagine the world as we know it ought to be. Partly because we have got God and religion down to such a damn science and we envision God as a static “keeper of timeless doctrinal truths” who has himself “ceased to be active in history” (33). Walsh says we don’t “allow the reality of our lives to inform or correct” this static worldview (33).
From here on out he talks about Jeremiah, Bruce Cockburn, and Fukuyama…