The copy I read was released under the title Christmas on Honeysuckle Lane which is not nearly as appropriate a title. While this takes place during the holiday season, the book itself is about the family drama that unfolds after three adult siblings lose their parents. The idea itself is very compelling, and something that many people will have to go through as adults, but I wish the subject had been tackled by a stronger writer, or at least by one who had a tougher editor.
The number of typos and poor typesetting (such as using the wrong quotation mark) made me initially assume this was self-published. The book runs about 400 pages, but could easily lose 50-100 and not lose a step. Interestingly enough, I think the details that are dragging the book down are the type of details would've been perfect in a script. I wonder if the author was pulling from her experience as an actor when developing the scenes. Things like details about the room, or the unfinished breakfast, or the hum of the refrigerator can give an actor the tools needed to get into character and understand their perspective at that moment of a performance. Those details, however, are for the actor to do their work and aren't ever spoken. A stronger editor could've persuaded the author to drop some of these details that only served to bog down the story. Here, those details needed to have more reason for existing. It wasn't painting enough of a picture for the reader to feel immersed in the image, nor was it playing off of any sort of internal dialogue by the characters.
The dialogue, and there is a lot of it, is completely unbelievable, and not in a good way. Sometimes when I read a book and I come across particularly witty but unlikely dialogue I think to myself "People don't speak like this, but they should." In this book, everyone speaks like they are a completely enlightened self-help guru. And being as one character is an enlightened guru, this informs the reader who the "hero" of this story is supposed to be. The oldest sibling, Andie, is a quasi-Buddhist self-help star. It took me a third of the book to realize she's supposed to be for real and not full of shit. And amazingly, everyone in this tiny backwater town that is somehow near Washington, D.C. and Winchester, VA yet nowhere near Richmond is completely up on her "work" and "grateful for all she's done." They all love it. And everyone in the family can solve complicated emotional problems with a single conversation. That's all it takes. One conversation and all your family issues from grief to abandonment are solved. And you'll stop feeling feelings apparently, too.
So I guess the quasi-Buddhist self-help bullshit really does work. Next time I need to hammer out some sort of painful emotional issue, I'll just quote a centuries dead poet and everyone will immediately understand how to live their best life.
Perhaps the most aggravating scene in the book is when guru-Andie loses her mind and impulsively makes a move guaranteed to piss off everyone. Her meltdown is triggered by an online troll emailing her to call her fraud when all she did was "write the best book [she] could in that moment." If that's not an author realizing they are not good at this but finding a way to blame the readers I don't know what is. If I'm not good at my job, despite "doing the best I can in that moment" guess what? I don't get to do that job any more.
Also! All of the dialogue! Features an increasingly! annoying! number of exclamation points! Everyone is so excited when they say banal things!
All that said, I can absolutely see why Hallmark jumped on this for a Christmas movie. If you focus only on the family gathering at the holidays to settle the estate and the side story romance, then this could be a cute movie. (And admittedly, one I will watch now that I read the book.) Also, if you focus on the side story romance, the only relatable sibling, Emma, becomes the main character.
Overall, the concept for the story is good, but the execution is lacking. On the bright side, I came away grateful that I'm an only child.