I received an advanced copy of this book from the publisher through Goodreads Giveaways.
Full disclosure: I have been a fan of Dick Francis and his novels since I was a young teenager (so 30+ years). His novels, while following a "formula" of taking place in or around horse racing, never seemed formulaic, and additionally the writing was crisp, the dialogue was natural, and his protagonists were, without fail, likable -- and memorable.
I want so much to enjoy Felix's novels the way I used to enjoy his father's, and there are many things to like about them, most importantly the adherence to the formula noted above in keeping the action at the racetrack. However, the reality is that this is a different author from the one I grew up reading, and it's apparent throughout the book in myriad ways. I can't warm to these characters, and therefore can't fully embrace the story.
First, the pros:
- Life at the racetrack is the lifeblood of these novels and it's intact in this story, including detailed descriptions of everything from daily barn life to the biggest race day on the American racing calendar, the Kentucky Derby.
- This is not the first Francis novel set in the US but it is one of few, and I enjoyed reading about the familiar Triple Crown schedule and races through a foreigner's eyes.
- For NON-horse folk or racing fans, there are an abundance of explanatory passages, so no worries about not understanding the terminology or mechanics of racing.
- The mystery itself, as most do in the end, found me caught up especially in the final quarter of the book.
But, the cons:
- The abundance of explanatory passages referenced above come across very pedantic. It's no secret that Felix left a career in teaching to take up the family's writing legacy, but even if I didn't know that, the feeling of being "taught something" would remain. It's OK to be taught -- I like learning, really! -- but the manner in which it's done is so stilted and formal, and really breaks the flow of the narrative. To be going along reading an exchange between characters, only to have a full paragraph or more break to "explain" something to the reader about racing, or the US prison system (which anyone who has watched "Oz" could write about), or the fact that US federal agents carry and use guns -- it's just disruptive to the story. On top of that, in many cases (such as the latter two examples), it's really telling me more about Felix Francis and what he thinks about things like gun control than it is about Jeff Hinkley, the novel's protagonist.
- If the teaching is stilted and formal, it fits in perfectly with the dialogue. This has been (for me) a disappointment in all of the novels since Dick stopped writing them. I had hoped that it was going to improve over time as Felix settled into the role of writer, but the reality is perhaps this is just the way he speaks. There may be a few contractions used in the novel but it can't be many! In my experience, people just don't speak that way, not even the British. In fact the formality of the speech is in stark contrast with my own experience of how people interact, so again, it sort of jolts you out of the story to have to read "It is ..." when "It's" would have been more natural and likely.
- Lastly, the character. This could be a direct result of the first two issues above -- the pedantic nature of the writing as well as the unlikely formality of the dialogue -- but this character lacks all the charm, wit, panache, and likability of a Sid Halley or a Kit Fielding. I have to confess, while I have read ALL of Dick Francis' novels, as well as Felix's, I had NO recollection of Jeff Hinkley until I read the blurb on Goodreads AFTER I finished the novel. And apparently he's been in not just one but TWO of the prior Felix novels! I'll take some of the blame that my brain isn't as young as it was when I first got on the Francis kick as a kid, but really, if the character was engaging in any of the ways my favorites are, I would at least remember having read his name before. And I didn't. There is just not enough personality in the character to engender a level of interest or caring. There was some kind of reference to a current/former/ex (who knows?) love interest -- perhaps I was supposed to know her from a previous book? But I didn't, and didn't even care -- she was mentioned as an "oh by the way". Even Jeff himself doesn't seem to know or care if he is still in a relationship with her, so why on earth would the reader care? Frankly, this would be one place I'd love to see Felix DEPART from the formula -- forget about women. It's clear he doesn't know how to write any kind of a realistic or interesting romance or spark, so leave it out. It's OK! A great horse racing mystery wouldn't need it, if the rest was all in place.
Felix Francis understands racing because he was around it all his life, but more as a student than as a participant which again explains the pedantic tone -- he is transferring the knowledge HE learned to us. It lacks an authenticity that his father's novels had but there is nothing to be done about that. The mysteries themselves can be quite compelling and if Felix could restrain his natural proclivity to lecture, avoid any attempt to write a romantic relationship, and loosen up a bit in the dialogue, the books would be so much more enjoyable. All that said, I'm being generous and giving it a 3rd star because I love the "brand" and I want it to continue and improve.