Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Biblical Fallacies: For Agnostics, Atheists, and those with an open Mind.

Rate this book
To doubt the validity of scientific dating would be tantamount to doubting all other scientific discoveries. Science and religions have been at odds with one another since the time of Galileo, and understandably, so, because the scriptures were written long before man had any understanding of anything around them.
The author reveals secrets, which Church leaders rather not talk about. Archaeologist and Radio Carbon 14 dating contradict Biblical Chronology. Scholars likewise conclude that no original documents of any of the apostles were ever found. Moreover, what they do have in their possession could never have been written by any one of them. Discoveries that seriously weaken the credibility of these once revered documents, and much more, is revealed within the content of this very interesting and well-researched informative eye-opener.
The notion of a Deity; powerful enough to create an incredibly immense—seemingly infinite universe—so as to monitor the inhabitants of one small pale blue dot of a planet—in the midst of it all, is absolutely ridicules.

SETTLING FOR NOTHING LESS THAN THE TRUTH IS THE BEST WAY TO FRAME ONE'S BELIEF.

NOTE: (Because of the sensitive nature of this Essay, it has been made available with permission under different Titles and Authors.)

102 pages, Kindle Edition

Published January 2, 2016

7 people are currently reading
65 people want to read

About the author

Barry Ford

5 books

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
10 (38%)
4 stars
8 (30%)
3 stars
3 (11%)
2 stars
4 (15%)
1 star
1 (3%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
19 reviews1 follower
January 30, 2023
This could use another revision

In several occasions the author states he has researched issues but he erroneously assigns the massacre of the innocents to the gospel of Luke but it only appears in Matthew

This error still stands in the revised edition

How many more errors still stand?
Bad scholarship taints the over all credibility
And the strident tone comes to be counter productive to his case
Displaying 1 of 1 review

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.