What do you think?


La subjetivación: Curso sobre Foucault tomo III
Para Deleuze, la clave de lectura de la obra de Foucault está en el momento en el que acaban por desplegarse y concentrarse todas las tensiones anteriores en una pregunta dramática que lo mantiene en un impasse de varios años después de la publicación de La voluntad de saber: ¿es posible, me es posible, franquear la línea del poder? ¿Hay algo afuera del poder?
A esta pregunta responden las clases que se presentan aquí por primera vez en castellano, dictadas entre abril y mayo de 1986, y que completan los dos tomos anteriores del Curso sobre Foucault (El saber y El poder).
La respuesta supondrá atravesar el universo común a Heidegger y a Blanchot, que gravita sobre las nociones de afuera y de pliegue, para desembocar en la solución original de Foucault a partir del gobierno de sí. Forzosamente habrá que pasar por los “misterios” del final de su obra: ¿por qué ese raro regreso a los griegos? ¿por qué el retorno al sujeto? Se terminará de bosquejar así el tercer gran eje de la obra foucaultiana: la subjetivación.
La clase sobre la relación entre el poder y los modos de subjetivación cuenta con la participación de Félix Guattari, en la que se esbozan sus diferencias con Foucault e incluso diferencias de énfasis con el propio Deleuze.
A esta pregunta responden las clases que se presentan aquí por primera vez en castellano, dictadas entre abril y mayo de 1986, y que completan los dos tomos anteriores del Curso sobre Foucault (El saber y El poder).
La respuesta supondrá atravesar el universo común a Heidegger y a Blanchot, que gravita sobre las nociones de afuera y de pliegue, para desembocar en la solución original de Foucault a partir del gobierno de sí. Forzosamente habrá que pasar por los “misterios” del final de su obra: ¿por qué ese raro regreso a los griegos? ¿por qué el retorno al sujeto? Se terminará de bosquejar así el tercer gran eje de la obra foucaultiana: la subjetivación.
La clase sobre la relación entre el poder y los modos de subjetivación cuenta con la participación de Félix Guattari, en la que se esbozan sus diferencias con Foucault e incluso diferencias de énfasis con el propio Deleuze.
Paperback
Published January 1, 2015
About the author
Gilles Deleuze
275 books2,813 followersDeleuze is a key figure in poststructuralist French philosophy. Considering himself an empiricist and a vitalist, his body of work, which rests upon concepts such as multiplicity, constructivism, difference and desire, stands at a substantial remove from the main traditions of 20th century Continental thought. His thought locates him as an influential figure in present-day considerations of society, creativity and subjectivity. Notably, within his metaphysics he favored a Spinozian concept of a plane of immanence with everything a mode of one substance, and thus on the same level of existence. He argued, then, that there is no good and evil, but rather only relationships which are beneficial or harmful to the particular individuals. This ethics influences his approach to society and politics, especially as he was so politically active in struggles for rights and freedoms. Later in his career he wrote some of the more infamous texts of the period, in particular, Anti-Oedipus and A Thousand Plateaus. These texts are collaborative works with the radical psychoanalyst Félix Guattari, and they exhibit Deleuze’s social and political commitment.
Gilles Deleuze began his career with a number of idiosyncratic yet rigorous historical studies of figures outside of the Continental tradition in vogue at the time. His first book, Empirisism and Subjectivity, is a study of Hume, interpreted by Deleuze to be a radical subjectivist. Deleuze became known for writing about other philosophers with new insights and different readings, interested as he was in liberating philosophical history from the hegemony of one perspective. He wrote on Spinoza, Nietzche, Kant, Leibniz and others, including literary authors and works, cinema, and art. Deleuze claimed that he did not write “about” art, literature, or cinema, but, rather, undertook philosophical “encounters” that led him to new concepts. As a constructivist, he was adamant that philosophers are creators, and that each reading of philosophy, or each philosophical encounter, ought to inspire new concepts. Additionally, according to Deleuze and his concepts of difference, there is no identity, and in repetition, nothing is ever the same. Rather, there is only difference: copies are something new, everything is constantly changing, and reality is a becoming, not a being.
He often collaborated with philosophers and artists as Félix Guattari, Michel Foucault, Guy Hocquenghem, René Schérer, Carmelo Bene, François Châtelet, Olivier Revault d'Allonnes, Jean-François Lyotard, Georges Lapassade, Kateb Yacine and many others.
Gilles Deleuze began his career with a number of idiosyncratic yet rigorous historical studies of figures outside of the Continental tradition in vogue at the time. His first book, Empirisism and Subjectivity, is a study of Hume, interpreted by Deleuze to be a radical subjectivist. Deleuze became known for writing about other philosophers with new insights and different readings, interested as he was in liberating philosophical history from the hegemony of one perspective. He wrote on Spinoza, Nietzche, Kant, Leibniz and others, including literary authors and works, cinema, and art. Deleuze claimed that he did not write “about” art, literature, or cinema, but, rather, undertook philosophical “encounters” that led him to new concepts. As a constructivist, he was adamant that philosophers are creators, and that each reading of philosophy, or each philosophical encounter, ought to inspire new concepts. Additionally, according to Deleuze and his concepts of difference, there is no identity, and in repetition, nothing is ever the same. Rather, there is only difference: copies are something new, everything is constantly changing, and reality is a becoming, not a being.
He often collaborated with philosophers and artists as Félix Guattari, Michel Foucault, Guy Hocquenghem, René Schérer, Carmelo Bene, François Châtelet, Olivier Revault d'Allonnes, Jean-François Lyotard, Georges Lapassade, Kateb Yacine and many others.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews
January 12, 2016
Un lujo poder leer a Deleuze en el contexto de sus cursos, seguirlo hasta el final. En este volumen "interpreta" el problema de la subjetivación en Foucault -en el sentido propuesto por el mismo Deleuze, es decir, interpretar como indentificar los conceptos fundamentales de su obra en su originalidad y trazando a la vez las líneas que los conectan. Para quienes han leído ya el "Foucault" de Deleuze esta tercera y última parte de este curso otorga la posibilidad de asistir a los ritmos en que elabora su argumentación, la expande, singulariza, y crea, ejercicio de una riqueza que se agradece. ¿Cómo franquear la línea del poder? Este libro es una exploración de esa pregunta que aproblemó a Foucault, una continuación y elaboración a la vez de una cartografía posible al respecto.
July 15, 2026
Conclusa la trilogia su Foucault dell'amico Deleuze. A tratti mi domandavo se avessi mai letto niente di più astratto di questo. Foucault è indubbiamente un autore difficile e Deleuze, da suo grande lettore e ammiratore, riesce a trasmettere la grande passione, gli sforzi di una vita, l'impegno sociale, l'incessante ricerca e la modestia di un autore gigante. Attraverso una trattazione sistematica e attenta, piena di ritorni e chiarimenti ma libera a numerose digressioni, Deleuze riesce a fare luce su delicati punti caldi dell'autore, spiegando i suoi concetti principali, le sue ossessioni, l'importanza filosofica e sociale, le sue passioni, l'impasse filosofico in cui si trova bloccato ad un certo punto della carriera e il modo nel quale riesce a superarlo, seppur con difficoltà. Non conosco Foucault abbastanza da valutare il lavoro di Deleuze ma sicuramente Gilles è un filosofo di grande levatura, di vaste conoscenze e un uomo di intelligenza rara. L'opera scende in alcuni momenti su un piano concreto ma rimane una trattazione molto astratta, complessa, persino matematica. Però il metodo di Foucault appare visibile ed esposto ed offre allo studioso o al semplice pensatore nuovi modi, più profondi e cauti, di rapportarsi alla società e agli uomini. Da leggere se si è interessati all'archeologo del sapere francese, o se si vuole aprirsi ad un pensiero unico e molto sottile. Inoltre, Deleuze offre sempre spunti di pensiero, grazie si suoi riferimenti alla letteratura, al cinema, all'arte.
Voto 5 per tutti i volumi.
Voto 5 per tutti i volumi.
July 19, 2023
Un curs que és una singularitat, un punt de resistència en sí mateix. M'han encantat els tres cursos de Deleuze sobre Foucault, però potser aquest últim més que els altres dos - el primer va ser definitivament el més difícil. M'ha semblat una manera preciosa d'arrodonir el pensament foucaultià: tot i que al principi és força abstracte el concepte de afuera i línea del afuera, amb les pàgines una s'hi va apropant... i acabem sent un plec, la subjectivació com a plec de l'afora, l'afora d'on prové tot pensament, la línia de l'afora com a condició de pensament mateix a velocitat molecular, el plec d'aquesta com a ésser-lent... cadascú ha de trobar la seva línia i manegar-s'ho com pugui per sobreviure-la. Meravellós!
Read
January 21, 2023tre libri letti in meno di un mese ma sono tutti di filosofia mi voglio vomitare addosso
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews





