I saw this book on Kindle Unlimited and felt compelled to read it. Write a novel in nine days? I wasn't sure why anyone would WANT to do that, but I was willing to give the author a chance.
POSITIVES: The writing is clear and concise and the book was a quick read, so there was no major time investment involved. I enjoyed the author's sense of humor, even if it was a bit hokey at times.
NEGATIVES: Where do I start?
* I was bothered by the assumption that we're all capable of writing 1000 words an hour, which is the basis for the entire strategy. Yes, that figure could be adjusted to suit the writer, but that's barely taken under consideration in this book. The author just keeps beating readers over the head with this 1000 words/hour figure, because of course, the objective here is to spit out words as fast as possible.
* The book itself stands as proof that writing with frenetic speed has consequences. It feels rushed, poorly structured, and is often repetitive. As the author says, it took him less than a week to complete it. That definitely shows.
* The author is dismissive of the "slow and steady" approach, ignoring that this method works for countless writers. He goes overboard in presenting his strategy as the RIGHT one, as if "write as fast as possible" is the only way to get anything accomplished. I'm not bothered by this for my own sake, but it makes me worry about newer, more impressionable writers. Fact is, the majority of people won't be able to manage 10K words a day (or anywhere close to it). And other than the 5K concessions, writers really aren't given any alternatives.
The author presents his method in an "anyone can do it" kind of way, which is misleading, unrealistic, and potentially damaging. There aren't any reassurances for writers who can't keep up, only negative reinforcement thanks to the "Slow and steady? Pfft!" attitude that pervades this book.
* The not-so-subtle pushes for readers to purchase Scrivener (the author is an affiliate) were obnoxious, as was seeing it presented as the only alternative to Microsoft Word. There are dozens of great writing programs out there. Mentioning a few of these programs and encouraging writers to find one that works for THEM would've shown a lot more integrity than repeatedly pushing Scrivener for the author's profit.
Really though, this was hardly surprising, as he's entirely focused on HIS way of doing things. Examples of this are the 1000 words/hour standard I mentioned above, as well as a "set in stone" story structure he pushes to the point of beating readers over the head with it. Even his suggestions for carving out more writing time (ubiquitous throughout the course of the book) are clearly based on his own lifestyle.
* I spotted several grammatical errors, including subject/verb agreement issues and misused words ("elicit" and "illicit" mean very different things). I'm not trying to nitpick, but when you're putting out books intended to coach people on writing well, obvious mistakes like these are embarrassing.
Needless to say, I wouldn't recommend this book. The author explains (and reiterates the hell out of) his strategy, but I can't see it being practical for most writers.