Ten years of practice and three hundred years of inherited arrogance
OR
Angelo's Provencal Odyssey.
Angelo, the natural son of a very wealthy duchess, is at the crossroads of two worlds. An illegitimate aristocrat, a revolutionary lavish on the money he hasn't earned, a humanist at heart who likes to wield a sword, he crosses borders and seeks his home. Yet, Angelo is looking for himself, too. He aims to define himself by defending a cause, that of the people, of their freedom, but he doubts it. Does Angelo challenge himself to fight for the cause or justify his pride? Above all, he questions the people because the circumstances do not give them a positive image.
Angelo engaged in a Piedmontese revolutionary action and fled his country. He went to seek money in Provence from a friend, Giuseppe, his foster brother, and was surprised there by a cholera epidemic. The social order implodes under the ravages of the disease. The people indulge in the worst abuses: lynchings, thefts, and settling scores of all kinds in a growing collective hysteria.
It is not the only man who rises against man; soon, nature seeks to eliminate him. Birds, crows, pigeons, and even nightingales or sparrows attack corpses and even the living when they pretend to doze off! The sun is a natural furnace that makes a sky of plaster, knocking down everything that lives. Towards the end of the book, the rains are a deluge worthy of Noah. Everything stands against everyone, and everyone fears or fights each other. Man and nature seem to return to the original chaos.
In this turmoil, everyone is trying to survive as best they can. Angelo remains faithful to his chivalrous ways, even if they sometimes find bizarre expressions in the route, so he spends an indefinite number of days or weeks. - to wash soiled corpses abandoned in the middle of the street while waiting for the part of the "Crows" to take them to the stake. Idealistic, fiery, loving to fight - an intelligent 112 because inhabited by doubt - he goes through these trials. This idealism protects him because, throughout the book, it becomes increasingly clear that cholera is mental and psychological. If it is not imaginary, it is a kind of decay to which man lets himself go. That was a disease of civilization, an evil world, or a path to failure always open to man. But, unless you continue to believe in it and thus be protected from these miasmas, as Angelo does, he doubts but does not despair. Whatever the reality behind that word, cholera has no hold on him.
One will remember, of course, Giono's experiments. Son of an anarchist shoemaker - we talk a lot about boots in Le Hussard - and a seamstress, he spent the whole of the First World War in the trenches and was in all the great battles. He saw, up close, bestiality with a human face, even nature - rats, dysentery, mud - rising against man. He lived among people trying to survive in this horror. Is cholera an image of this? After the war, Giono flirted with communism but quickly turned away, preferring a small rural community to the proletarian revolution. The man, who had no clear political affiliation, made a few missteps during the occupation, suffered from it, and then turned away entirely from any political or social considerations. It was this man, the post-war Giono, who wrote Le Hussard. He shows a man who doubts, yes, but who remains true to himself and his convictions in a world that knows beauty but also episodes of profound horror.