I have VERY conflicted feelings about this book. It had such a strong, beautiful, brilliant start. I was sure I would love it beyond words and it would be one of the best reads of 2017 for me. The theme of a misfit, oppressed and abused by everyone, suddenly changing and becoming something different and better, triumphing over their enemies - is one of my favorites. And it was so wonderful to watch Geoff's transformation. He was in such a bad place in the beginning of the book and yet such a sympathetic character, I was rooting for him like mad.
The nature of his changes was fascinating, too, and the side-effects, and oh, the possibilities they carried for the development of the book! I was looking at how long the book was - and looking forward to it becoming deeper, richer, more intellectually stimulating. So many questions to be asked and answered!
What is the price of becoming someone stronger, better, more capable than an average human? How does it affect the one changed? How does the possibility of doing virtually anything without fear of punishment affect a person? Can Seuthers be trusted? His speeches are pretty and sound right but any - ANY - ideas can be wrapped into beautiful and seemingly inarguable words to enlist new recruits for a cause. And how about experimenting on people without warning them about the result, basically lying to them and using them blindly?
Oops. It was not the direction the book took. Instead it turned into something that really, really bothered me. I'm not a nice, all-forgiving, turn-the-other-cheek person. 'I spit on your grave' are my favorites movies. I totally rejoice when the evil is punished. But - the evil really must be that: evil. It needs to DESERVE its punishment.
And this is where I feel that my understanding of right and wrong is vastly different from the author's. I don't feel a bit of problem reading about pedophiles, child rapists and bombers killed by the "good" guys. They deserve it. But does a person deserve to be killed for voicing his opinion in a private conversation, no matter how ugly this opinion is? Is it all right to kill the sitting protesters because they have some hostile things written on their streamers? I just can't accept the answer the book gives.
If you think it is all right to kill a person for having different political views - you yourself are no better than those you call evil. As I was reading this book, with its endless preaching how the bad guys are full of hate to those who are different and spread their hate around, I wanted to yell: but it's exactly what this book is doing! It is so full of hate to those who think differently, it keeps repeating over and over that they don't deserve to live, they can't be redeemed, they don't deserve compassion, they don't have personalities, they are just evil, evil and should be killed. It was very disturbing.
I was really struggling with the last third of the book. I was disgusted and lost all the connection with the characters but I wanted to finish it because I hoped... maybe it somehow would turn all right in the end. Maybe all this hatred and murders and the characters' self-righteousness are exactly the question: is there any difference between the so-called "evil" the main characters fight - and them themselves? Aren't they just as evil, cruel, brainwashed and used by someone who just chose prettier words to convince them? Nope, really. That's all was at face value. Seuthers is a genius, he is fighting for saving the Earth, and the main characters are really bringing "love" to this world by killing hordes of people.
Actually, there was one thing I loved about this book unquestioningly - it was Geoff and Chris's romance. It was so beautiful in so many ways. Chris was beautiful beyond words. From the beginning there was this fragile, outworldly, incredibly appealing quality about him. He was not just easy to like - you were falling into him straight away and hopelessly. And his relationship with Geoff, their first love, every moment they spent together was precious to read about. In the beginning, when I was meeting a sex scene in the book (like Shane masturbating, or watching 110 in the club) I was always wondering why it was there because it was giving nothing to the book. Well, it made sense later when the love between Geoff and Chris was described in the way that didn't need erotic scenes, so chaste and tender and strong.
And Chris's transformation made sense so much, and even the way he was dealing with "the evil"... right, avenging angels don't discriminate between more guilty and less guilty.
But people do. And being stronger, faster, more capable to blend, etc. doesn't free you from human morality. If anything, it puts on you more responsibility.
And I'm afraid the book carries exactly the opposite message.
I would have given the first half of the book five shining stars, and everything Chris - too. But I feel the message this book sends is so wrong and disturbing that I can barely rate it as "it was okay". That's why the rating.