If you want to read a novel about Siddhartha Gautama, the historic Buddha, please read _Old Path, White Clouds_ by Thich Nhat Hanh. (I could also recommend my book _Every Day is Magical: A Buddhist Pilgrimage in India and Nepal_, but that would be shameless self-promotion. Still, it involves visiting places significant to the Buddha.)
Oddly, many Goodreads reviewers apparently think that Herman Hesse's novel _Siddhartha_ is about the historic Buddha, but It isn't; it's the spiritual journey of a guy who shares his first name.
Before I started reading this book for a discussion group, I assumed it would be a good introduction to Buddhism and the Buddha's life, a good book to get new people to join the Buddhist book discussion group. Not so much.
SPOILERS
I don't sense that the author understands Buddhism. It sounds like he's writing about Shaivite Hinduism, not Buddhism. (Chopra is Indian and probably grew up with Hinduism.) Before I read the scene under the papal tree, it seemed like he didn't even try to get the Buddha's Enlightenment right, placing it too early--while he's starving himself--rather than after he meets Sujata and figures out the Middle Way. Maybe that was supposed to be when he reaches one of the jhanas, but the book makes it sound like he reached Enlightenment at this stage. Confusing. The book does finally show him reach another stage under the tree. Still no mention of the Middle Way.
Of all things to change in the Buddha's life, that was a terrible choice. The Middle Way is a major part of Buddhism. Maybe some Hindus still believe you can reach Enlightenment by practicing extreme austerity to the point that you nearly starve to death, but not so Buddhists.
I like how he described mystical experiences. I also found it interesting how he turned Mara into a major character; usually you only read about his attempts to distract the Buddha from Enlightenment under the bodhi tree.
No, Devadutta didn't rape and murder Sujata. What sort of sicko would make up that?! I nearly threw the book across the room and gave it one star on Goodreads.
Sujata met the Buddha when he was practicing such extreme austeries that he nearly starved to death, and she saved him by feeding him kheer, so he came up with the Middle Way.
Now that I've finished reading this book: The real Sujata (who, by the way, has an ancient stupa dedicated to her) does appear in this book. But he portrays her as a sixteen year old about to get married rather than a child, and just to make sure we know Chopra thinks women are objects, he shows Siddhartha commenting on her beauty (allegedly to show that he's aware of her beauty but doesn't feel lust, but it's douchely done).
Still, Chopra made up an additional character named Sujata... to have Devadutta rape and murder her in order to further Siddhartha's life plot.. even though his path would have been the same without this. NOT okay. V. S. Schwab recently on Twitter vented about this tired and misogynistic plot point of killing off a woman (or having a woman character raped, or both) for a male character's story. Since the 2016 election, it's hit home that the majority of men don't see women as fully human; Chopra's writing reveals this attitude.
He skips over Siddhartha's married life, rather than showing Yasodhara as a three-dimensional individual, and just shows shallow snippets in flashbacks. Apparently he doesn't know how to write anyone female as a three-dimensional character.
I recently attended a writers conference in which an author talked about "the violence of writing about someone from history." In this book, it's literally violence.
I feel like writing a story involving a magical cliff. Every single author who has had a female character raped and/ or murdered to further the life story of a male character...falls off the cliff.
Misogynists continue to be rewarded for writing fiction in which they have no empathy for female characters. I was sick of this trope before picking up this book.