Neurotic Styles

by David Shapiro, Rene Weideman (Narrator)

David Shapiro, psikanalizin ego psikolojisi ekolünden ve de W. Reich’tan esinlenerek psikopatolojiye ve psikoterapiye özgün bir karakterolojik yaklaşım geliştirmiş ABD’li bir klinik psikolog / psikoterapisttir. İlk olarak 1965 yılında yayınlanmış ve kısa sürede modern bir klasik haline gelmiş olan Nevrotik Tarzlar kitabında Shapiro, dört ayrı nevroz tarzına (obsesif-kompulsif, paranoid, histerik ve itkisel) ait düşünüş, hissediş ve davranış özelliklerinin oldukça kapsamlı ve çarpıcı bir değerlendirmesini yapmaktadır.

Kitabın temel önermesi, bütün nevrotik belirti ve özelliklerin kişinin karakterinin bir ürünü olduğu ve bu yüzden karakter yapısının bütününden bağımsız bir nevroz kavramsallaştırmasının mümkün olamayacağıdır. Shapiro’ya göre bilinç alanına girmesine izin verilmeyen sadece belli anılar ya da arzular değildir; aynı zamanda karakter tarzının bütününe dair ciddi kısıtlılıklar söz konusudur. Bu bakış açısı, genel olarak Ego Psikolojisi ekolü içinde sayılabilirse de döneminde egemen olan Ego Psikolojisi anlayışına göre çok daha az ortodokstur; klasik psikanaliz açısından bakıldığında ise iyice psikanaliz dışında görülebilir.

Nevrotik Tarzlar, egemen / resmi psikanalitik paradigmanın dışından söz kurmasına rağmen, nevrotik öznelliği çok zengin bir şekilde tarifleme kapasitesi nedeniyle çoğu psikanalistin ve psikanalize kulak kabartan psikoterapistlerin ilgisiz kalamadığı bir kitap olagelmiştir.

Psikanalitik psikoterapiyle ilgili herkesin nevrotik öznelliğe dair çok şey öğrenebileceği bir eser.

Genres: Psychology, Nonfiction, Psychoanalysis, Psychiatry, Mental Health, Mental Illness, Grad School

Audio CD

First published November 30, 1964

Reviews

[Matt · Rating 3 out of 5]

This book was okay, although I had higher hopes since it is a classic in psychoanalytic theory. Shapiro does a nice job of discussing character structures but I think McWilliams does this more adeptly in Psychoanalytic Diagnosis. The last chapter is worth a read in terms of what defenses mean and how our character structure impacts these defenses.

[Lindsey · Rating 4 out of 5]

If you are or plan to be a psychologist in New York City, you would be wise to read this, and if you read it for class and didn't absorb anything, you would be wise to read it again.

[Jen Crichton · Rating 4 out of 5]

What is a neurotic and what is the point of therapy?

My greatest takeaway from this book as a non-therapist is that a neurotic is a person who has become a stranger to oneself.

I don’t know why I’m so upset.
Why did I do that?
I just feel out of sorts and I don’t know why.

Neuroses as adaptive constructions that take you away from feelings you can’t cope with has always made sense to me. But the end result of constructing a self that is a stranger to oneself was less clear.

The neurotic styles that Shapiro describes are blueprints of such adaptations. I am sure much of the text is outdated, especially as it pertains to the more dire mental illnesses. But so much still rings true. Human nature and insights into it don’t move all that quickly.

Now I know all and I’m cured!

Ha, no. But the great benefit of talk therapy and reading a book like this — for certain people — is that psychological understanding can help you become less of a stranger to yourself. Every time you understand yourself a bit more clearly, the more integrated and strong you become as a person which in turn helps dismantle the neurotic carapace.

For every page or two reading this book, I stared into space and thought a bit about myself and the people who I know. It took me a year to read. But by the end I became slightly less strange to myself.

[J. Keck · Rating 3 out of 5]

An interesting view into the psychodynamic understanding of various personality disorders. I used this book in a psychopathology class. More current books are useful in understanding and treatment of the disorders.

[Peter Feld · Rating 5 out of 5]

This perceptive psychoanalytic treatise doubles as a dating guide if you read between the lines!

[Benjamin Dike · Rating 5 out of 5]

Fascinating ideas about the relationship between attention, volition and affect. Really outstanding, similar to the work of phenomenologists like Maurice Merleau Ponty.

[Özenç Öztürk · Rating 4 out of 5]

Ego psikolojisi açısından nostaljik bir yere sahip öğretici nitelikte bir kitap.

[Princess · Rating 5 out of 5]

Excellent.

[Rachel Jones · Rating 5 out of 5]

I read this for my Psychopathology course, and found it quite informative and perceptive. Def. a book to read and reread.

[Eric]

Chapter 2 gave a lot of insight into effective altruism for a 55-year old book.

[Patty 🐈‍⬛ · Rating 3 out of 5]

Ho fatto fatica a leggerlo. Credo che sia destinato agli addetti ai lavori e non ai curiosi e basta come me.

[Ari · Rating 5 out of 5]

Very good delineation of hysterical cognition

[Robert · Rating 5 out of 5]

Fantastic! If you are into psychology, read it!

[Psihoterapeut psihanalist Dorin Bîtfoi · Rating 3 out of 5]

Surprisingly, the book offers little or no psychodynamic insight, but insists on delineating a "formal" approach to neurotic realities.

[Natalie · Rating 4 out of 5]

This book gives a good perspective on how each neurotic style feels, or manifests.

[Vicki · Rating 4 out of 5]

Got to read this book for a class but I have to admit... it's pretty good!

[Valentina Năstăşel · Rating 5 out of 5]

Badly needs another editing.

[T · Rating 4 out of 5]

Read in 1979.