This is the third book of Tozer's that I've read, after "The Knowledge of the Holy" and "Pursuit of God," and I would rate it four stars. I doubt I'd reread it (5 stars.) I prefer Andrew Murray or S. D. Gordon or Kay Arthur on prayer.
This book was a collection of snippets of Tozer's writings on prayer, usually a couple of pages long. W. L. Seaver wrote discussion questions after each excerpt and I enjoyed them as much as I did Tozer's writings.
I loved the quote:
“Tell God all that is in your heart, as one unloads one’s heart, its pleasures and its pains to a dear friend. Tell Him your troubles that He may comfort you; tell Him your longings that He may purify them; tell Him your dislikes that He may help you conquer them; tell Hi your temptations that He may shield you from them; show Him the wounds of your soul that He ay heal them; lay bare your indifference to good, your depraved taste for evil, your instability. Tell Him how your self-love makes you unjust to others, how vanity tempts you to be insincere, how pride hides you from yourself and from others… Bless are those who attain such familiar, unreserved communication with God.” Francois Fenelon in “Spiritual Letters”
And I loved the homework on it to talk to God about these things, one or two a day, to get us talking, really talking, to God. In fact, I think that may have been the best part about the whole book.
I've had a thought on Abraham's prayers for Sodom and Gomorrah in Genesis 18. Did he quit praying too soon?
I found the compilation of verses on turning backs towards God (and then God turning His back on the people) in Jeremiah troubling, inspiring, and warning, all at once.
I found Julian of Norwich's prayers, adding, "And this I ask without any condition," that is, no matter what it cost, also very convicting and challenging.
I liked the analogy of truth being like a bird with two wings, that we should balance scripture with scripture because a one-winged bird doesn't fly very well.
I liked the baseball analogy, and will describe it to my softball player. Satan is like a pitcher that tries all kinds of unpredictable pitches so we never know where and how the temptation will appear.
I can be like a Moses, in that I can sometimes get results quickly [in hitting the rock], but not God's way and suffer for it. Or I can be like a Joshua, who depended too much on appearances of those claiming to be from afar. Or David, who didn't pray before taking a census. In fact, the point was that none of them prayed first; they just rushed headlong into things.
Repeatedly in this book, throughout these excerpts, Tozer indicates that God does not say "no" to prayers, but when He doesn't answer a prayer in the affirmative, it's our fault for not praying in enough faith or for not living sinlessly enough.
I know a couple who prayed in faith. In fact, the wife said that God had always granted her requests before. They knew of no repeated, consuming sin. And yet, their child died. There seems to be another such couple a friend of mine knows in her church, who is also facing the immanent loss of their child under similar faith-scenarios. It seems cruel to me to say that they didn't have enough faith or that some secret sin of theirs caused this. It makes me think of Job, who was so good-hearted that God bragged on him to Satan - and yet Job suffered.
Tozer had a good point that when we don't get what we pray for, people often don't investigate themselves enough to see if the fault lies there. But there's also Jesus in Gethsemane, asking for the Father not to send Him to the cross if there's any other way, or Paul with his thorn. I think that God sometimes does tell us, "no," even if Tozer preached so hard against that thought. That doesn't excuse any misbehavior on our part, and it doesn't excuse a lack of introspection to determine if there's any sin in the way. [Although certainly there is forgiveness if we ask for it!] I heard it said once that when we pray, God gives us what we would have asked for if we'd known better. And I like that answer better. Or S. D. Gordon's thought that while God didn't answer Paul about removing the thorn by removing it, He did answer the man - that while God doesn't always do what we want, He still meets our soul's needs.
Or this Charles Spurgeon quote: "Still remember that prayer is always to be offered in submission to God's will. When we say that God hears prayer, we do not mean that He always gives us literally what we ask for. However, we do mean this: that He gives us what is best for us, and that if He does not give us the mercy we ask for in silver, He bestows it upon us in gold. If He does not take away the thorn in the flesh, yet He says, 'My grace is sufficient for thee' (2 Cor. 12:9), which amounts to the same in the end." – Charles Spurgeon in “The Golden Key of Prayer”
But since Tozer blamed the praying people when prayers aren't answered, he also blamed them for the resulting lack of faith when they don't see God answering their imperfect prayers. Weeeeelll, be that as it may - and we are culpable for the state of our faith - I think part of the blame is in the false prosperity (or health and wealth) doctrine that God always gives us what we ask for and plenty of it. I find that to be a disillusioning thing to believe, when eventually it fails. I would not, however, classify Tozer as a prosperity gospel preacher because he's quick to add the part about asking whether something's in God's will, and blaming the person praying if it's not.
It annoyed me a little bit that Tozer called us "omnipotent" - or all-powerful - when we pray. He actually did that twice, and in the second such excerpt, he explained what he meant a little better. He meant that we were omnipotent "for a little while" because God is omnipotent on our behalf.
But first of all, we are not omnipotent since we are not in control, something he readily admitted in his first mentioning of our "omnipotence," and true omnipotence wouldn't wane, either.
Secondly, I don't want to be omnipotent, even if I really, really want things to go my way sometimes. No, I'd rather have an all-powerful God Who knows what He's doing and Who is acting out of love. The idea of me being all-powerful is a frightening one. That reminded me of the movie "Bruce Almighty" where God allows Bruce to take over His job and he ends up bungling it.
God wields His omnipotence perfectly with honor, justice, compassion, and wisdom - and mercy. I wouldn't want all that subjected to my whims of the moment or even my inability to see beyond the moment's hurt.
Despite his words, I don't really think that Tozer thinks that we are omnipotent when we pray, because he also said, "God will not change His eternal purposes on the word of a man. We do not pray in order to persuade God to change His mind... What the praying man does is to bring his will into line with the will of God so God can do what He all along has been willing to do." - in "The Price of Neglect"
I would say that when Tozer said we are omnipotent when we pray, he really meant that prayer is powerful. And prayer is only powerful, not because we are praying, but because it is God Who answers.
In "The Price of Neglect" quote above, I'd also answer that God can do whatever He wants, whether or not our will is aligned with His - because He's omnipotent - but that quite often He chooses to work with us rather than without us.
To be fair to Tozer, another couple of Tozer quotes that show a better understanding of God's Omnipotence from a different source ["The Knowledge of the Holy"] are:
"This word ["Almighty"] occurs fifty-six times in our English Bible and is never used of anyone but God. He alone is almighty."
"Prayer is not in itself meritorious. It lays God under no obligation nor puts Him in debt to any. He hears prayer because He is good, and for no other reason."
My husband wanted me to note that since this book, "Prayer," is excerpts of other books, these snippets may not give the full thought on a given topic, that it might be unintentionally misleading as to the whole. I felt like since they were generally several pages long, probably the excerpts at least had the gist of it, although there may be missing nuances or context.
In this book, "Prayer," Tozer threw me through a loop for awhile with his quote from Jeremiah 20:7 where Jeremiah said "O Lord, You deceived me and I was deceived." Tozer just quoted it to show that we can be honest before God, and even call Him a liar when we feel Him to be [even though, in actuality, He isn't.] I must've read that verse before, but somehow I didn't remember it.
So that sent me scurrying off to read that verse in the context of the chapter or more and to read different translations of the verse and various commentaries on it as to why Jeremiah was calling God a liar - and asking my husband what he thought about the verse. And the rest of the verse was even worse.
Some translators translated the word "persuaded" rather than "deceived." Some commentators said that Jeremiah felt deceived because he thought he'd be prophesying against other nations, but not his own. Other commentators said that Jeremiah's own nation was calling him deceived, and he were speaking hypothetically - "Well, if I'm deceived, then God Himself is the One Who deceived me!" I'd say any and all of these are possibilities.
But I suppose that also we must remember that two-winged bird, and that although Jeremiah may have called God a liar, we know that He isn't one. "It is impossible for God to lie." - Hebrews 6:18 and "Let God be true and every man a liar." - Romans 3:4
Okay, that was a rabbit trail, and rabbit trails aside, that was not why Tozer mentioned the verse. He was merely commenting that we can be honest before God, and should be. There are other rabbit trails involving that passage as well that get even darker.
I do agree that answered prayers can draw people to Jesus. They can make people consider the role of the supernatural in our world. It doesn't seem to me like that would be good for the sole basis of belief, though. Would they only believe for what they can get out of God? Or in the answered prayers as proof of His existence? That seemed a little dangerous to me because He does not always give what we want, although He always does justly.
Some of this book was insightful, but much of it felt pedantic to me. I still prefer Andrew Murray, Charles Spurgeon, S. D. Gordon, etc.
Favorite quotes:
“Prayer is never an acceptable substitute for obedience.” – A. W. Tozer in “Of God and Men”
“Nowhere else in the whole field of religious thought and activity is courage so necessary as in prayer.” – A.W. Tozer in “We Travel an Appointed Way”
“Prayer at its holiest moment is the entering into God to a place of such blessed union as makes miracles seem tame and remarkable answers to prayer appear something very far short of wonderful by comparison.” – A. W. Tozer in “The Set of the Sail”
“The peace of heart does not come from denying that there is trouble, but comes from rolling your trouble on God.” – A. W. Tozer in “Prayer”
“Be anxious for nothing, but in everything by prayer …” – Philippians 4:6. A. W. Tozer said, “In everything by money, in everything by social prestige in everything by publicity, in everything by committee, in everything by business methods, in everything by education, and lastly in everything by compromise. All of these replacement options are found wanting in the eyes of God, yet Christians continue to regress to them. Of these eight options, not one pleases God, and each of them adds to the stress and anxiety of life.” – A. W. Tozer in “The Tozer Pulpit” I thought that was a funny quote, but a good description of what people do.
“No matter how many manifestations sin may have, remember that the liquid essence in a bottle is always self.” – A. W. Tozer in “The Attributes of God,” vol. 2
“The act of committal to Christ in salvation releases the believing man from the penalty of sin, but it does not release him from the obligation to obey the words of Christ. Rather it brings him under the joyous necessity to obey.” – A. W. Tozer in “Of God and Men”
“God is not a glorified Santa Claus, who gives us everything we want, then fades out, and lets us run our own way. He gives, but in giving, He gives us Himself, too. And the best gift God ever gives us is Himself. He gives answers to prayer, but after we’ve used up the answer or don’t need it anymore, we still have God.” – A. W. Tozer in “The Attributes of God,” vol. 2
"Give thanks to God for those delays and what you learned in them." - Seaver, the compiler, in the discussion questions. I think this is a good challenge, which is why I'm putting it in my favorite quotes. I don't think I'm there yet. I have seen some good in waiting for answered prayers, but the waiting is so terrible, I think, for the most part, that I will just have to trust that it is there.
"Can you remember some specific times or events where your joy was robbed by worry?" - Seaver. I suppose I'd answer this with a deer-in-the-headlights look. The house is on fire! And You seriously want me to notice these flowers? Well, no, I can't spend every waking moment on the fires of this life, and there are others working, too. And One other. Gratitude involves becoming still enough to notice that not everything rests on us. But did you see the size of that monster? I can't tear my eyes away from it long enough to savor or even notice anything else. And so then I know there is work to be done within. Priorities rearranged. Respect given. Awareness anew of Who God is and just what He is capable of.
"Now this is what I want to emphasize and lay on your conscience that you practice anticipatory prayers because battles are lost before they are fought."
"Temptation can't hurt you if you have anticipated it by prayer, but temptation will certain fell you if you have not."