While I don't love this one quite as much as the first, I still enjoyed revisiting this old favourite. I still need to read the third to read to check, but so far my memory is mostly correct that the events from the end of the previous are almost entirely dropped. Beth mentions her doll, but Frannie's wings aren't mentioned, and neither is Joe's pony -- the pony that somehow climbed down the ladder of the Faraway Tree and then went down the slippery-slip, something I still can't get my head around. What happened to the pony?
A little confusingly in this book, the children's mother appears to know about the tree with magical lands above it, and is neither surprised, concerned or shows any interest in going along to see for herself. One of the things I find stretches belief the most is when the adult characters believe in the magical happenings, but show no curiosity about them.
Slightly annoying cousin Rick (renamed from Dick) arrives in this one. He was less troublesome than I remembered, but still a little irritating. One the biggest plot-hole moments stems from Rick. He is sent to stay with his family because his mother is very ill and will be for a long time. At some point during this book, the children's own mother falls ill. They travel to a land that gives them a medicine for her. She recovers quickly, leaving half a bottle of this magical medicine which she then puts aside incase they might ever need it -- why not send it/take it to her sister? It makes even less sense than a pony using a slide.
My other gripe is Saucepan Man. The children observe, "Saucepan was always very funny when he heard things wrong" -- I disagree. This joke was wearing thin in the first book. By this point I am rolling my eyes every time he hears wrong and causes yet another disaster. Still, in fairness, I do think I found this amusing when I was younger.
Also, when they go the Land of Goodies, the rules are odd. They eat pieces of the marshmallow fence with no trouble, but when Rick eats someone's peppermint knocker he is punished. Why is a fence acceptable, but not a knocker? A fence is just as much private property as a door knocker.
So, those are my gripes, but overall it's a fun book. The illustrations are lovely, this time by Georgina Hargreaves.