Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Symbolic Logic: A First Course

Rate this book
Symbolic A first course

418 pages, Paperback

First published January 28, 1994

2 people are currently reading
45 people want to read

About the author

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
9 (52%)
4 stars
5 (29%)
3 stars
2 (11%)
2 stars
1 (5%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews
Profile Image for Rob.
278 reviews8 followers
March 11, 2008
Hardegree covers truth tables, sentential logic, and predicate logic in a simple and memorable way, with everyday language that is easy to understand. He gives the rules of his system of symbolic logic without using their traditional names for the most part. Most rules are named by the action that is performed in the inference; for example, instead of Addition, in which the reasoner has "P" and then infers "P v Q", Hardegree has "wedge in," and instead of modus ponens and modus tollens, he has "arrow out."

With the answers all given at the back of each section, the book offers an effective help in learning symbolic logic. I sometimes return to this book for practice and review; it works quite well for that.
Profile Image for An Vo.
11 reviews
December 10, 2018
Clear instructions. Clear explanation. I have no complaints
Profile Image for Lucille Nguyen.
443 reviews11 followers
March 5, 2023
A solid introduction or refresher to symbolic logic that's easy to read and follow. Definitely reintroduced me to the basic concepts and described them better than any other book on logic that I've ever read.
Profile Image for Ronald Lett.
221 reviews55 followers
July 31, 2014
A basic review of propositional and first-order predicate logic. The author engages the reader well, and offers down-to-earth examples for each new type of structure. Note that the text does not venture beyond basic predicate calculus: it is a good introductory text for students who may be unsure of the nature of mathematical proof, and would like to know what constitutes a sound argument to a mathematician.
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.