My three star review is for the written text of "Small Mouth Sounds" since I have only read it and not seen it performed on stage. I have seen Wohl's new play "Liberation" both off-Broadway and on Broadway, and it is one of the best plays I have seen her in years. Intensely moving and beautifully theatrical, Wohl's "Liberation" is a memory play about a woman remembering her second wave feminist mother and both the successes and failures of the movement. If you have a chance to see it, run to the theater now. I also saw the gloriously funny "Grand Horizons" on Broadway (with Jane Alexander, one of the best stage actresses I have ever seen) and the less successful "Camp Siegfried" off-Broadway.
Moving on to "Small Mouth Sounds," I decided to read it since I have loved some of Wohl's work and a trusted colleague recommended it after teaching it. Much of the play is non-verbal, so what works on stage as manipulated by the director and the actors doesn't always come off on the page. The story concerns a group of people who go on a spiritual retreat. The stage directions indicate they are all in some kind of "agony." Over the course of their week, they find surprising connections with others that may or may not have lasting impact on them.
Judy and Joan are a couple. Judy has cancer, and is desperately afraid of Joan leaving her. Alicia, an actress, is getting over a relationship with off-stage Fred, and her attempts to use her cell phone, which the leader says is verboten, probably provide some of the comedy of the show. Jan, a Finn, has lost a son and doesn't understand English as well as he thinks. Of course, his lack of communication skills also symbolizes the difficulty of the others to connect in different ways too. Rodney, a yoga instructor, is a dog who regularly cheats on his wife and targets Alicia. Finally, there's Ned whose back story rivals Job in the Bible.
The tone of the piece is sometimes mystifying. Is it satirical? Sincere? Both? I think this wide divergence of attitudes must mesh better in performance, but at times reading it, I found the tone confounding and frankly annoying. Clearly the people involved are looking for some answers, but the answers provided are so cliche that it is difficult to take seriously. But I suspect that what emerges on stage through the play's use of silence is more beautiful and profound. I hope to see the play some day, perhaps the biggest compliment one can give when reading a play.