In her 2016 The Long, Long Life of Trees author Fiona Stafford (who is a radio host and University of Oxford English literature professor) explores the science, culture and symbolism of seventeen common species of trees. And I should probably point out that The Long, Long Life of Trees is quite Eurocentric and often even rather United Kingdom specific and that as such, the book title The Long, Long Life of Trees is actually and in my opinion somewhat misleading since I certainly was expecting (and also wanting) a considerably more global and universal arboreal scope/coverage (although yes, I certainly have enjoyed reading Fiona Stafford's presented information regarding yew, cherry, rowan, olive, cypress, oak, ash, poplar, holly, sycamore, birch, horse chestnut, elm, willow, hawthorn, pine and apple trees and have found The Long, Long Life of Trees generally speaking engaging, enlightening and a very readable combination of science and non science, and with the detailed bibliography Stafford provides for The Long, Long Life of Trees being very much personally appreciated and in particular since adequate secondary source acknowledgement is far far too often either not considered or is presented in user unfriendly manners in non-fiction, but that Fiona Stafford's alphabetical bibliography as well as her detailed index for The Long, Long Life of Trees most definitely makes doing supplemental research on trees not a frustrating chore but actually something quite joyful and relatively easy).
And with regard to what is thematics and contents wise presented in The Long, Long Life of Trees, yes, I have been both textually delighted and also though at times just a tiny bit (but still most annoyingly) frustrated regarding Stafford's printed words. For while The Long, Long Life of Trees most certainly does wonderfully and gloriously demonstrate that trees do much more than take carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere and release oxygen, that trees therefore do not only help the earth breathe and regulate climate but also provide fruit, nuts etc. as well as the raw materials for everything from fence posts to pharmaceuticals (not to mention paper and books), that trees have inspired and continue to inspire poets and myth-makers, and that The Long, Long Life of Trees is in fact and indeed absolutely full full full of fascinating information and details on the seventeen trees Fiona Stafford has chosen to feature (such as for example how birch trees have been used as symbols of both individual flexibility and collective strength and unity in European politics both in the past and more recently, that oak and yew trees have or at least can have very long life spans and were sacred to both the Celts and also to many of the Germanic tribes), sorry, but I personally do think that there are a few informational holes present in The Long, Long Life of Trees and that the very much distinct and specific European and British focus of this book does somewhat lessen and lower its educational and reading value (well, at least it does so for me).
For one, I really and truly do not understand why in The Long, Long Life of Trees, Fiona Stafford has not included beeches in her list of seventeen trees. Because considering how important beechnuts are as a food staple (for both man and best) and that the English word book is derived from the Old English bōc and which is in turn related to the beech tree (since the Germanic runes were originally created from beechwood) it is in my opinion rather ridiculous to not find a section specific to beeches in The Long, Long Life of Trees. And furthermore, it is also equally annoying and for me an academic oversight that the only so-called living fossil tree being described by Stafford in The Long, Long Life of Trees is the holly (for even though trees like ginkgoes, wollemi pines, dawn redwoods, and monkey puzzle trees are not endemically present in Europe, as trees that have not changed for millions of years and also survived the K-T boundary extinction event that glitched the dinosaurs sixty-five million years ago, for me, these trees definitely should be included and have their own section in The Long, Long Life of Trees).
And for two, and finally, I also do find it quite perplexing and hugely infuriating that Fiona Stafford does not provide a much stronger criticism and condemnation in The Long, Long Life of Trees of in particular clear cutting. For indeed, the absence in The Long, Long Life of Trees of strong words by the author against over logging and especially of logging so-called old growth forests is a huge textual turn-off for me and does render and leave me more than a bit angry (and to recommend The Long, Long Life of Trees only with the necessary caveat that Stafford's presented text, whilst readable, enjoyable and educational rather does for me miss the mark with regard to not really be considering that logging and especially that large scale logging is and can be a huge environmental issue and all encompassing threat).
And finally, I also do have to point out to Fiona Stafford that Germany's Black Forest (der Schwarzwald in German) is not called black/schwarz because of supposed suspicion, fear and negativity (because of the colour black supposedly equalling something sinister and uncanny lurking in the woods) but because most of the coniferous trees in the Black Forest are black spruce trees, so yes, for Stafford in The Long, Long Life of Trees to insinuate and to rather claim otherwise (the opposite), that is both linguistically wrong and also clearly a deliberate misinterpretation by Stafford and her wanting to see something anti-forest and fear of the forest in a forest moniker that actually only has something to do with the type of trees located and thriving there (and in my opinion clearly nothing else).