Saint Foucault: Towards a Gay Hagiography

by David M. Halperin

The acclaimed author of One Hundred Years of Homosexuality offers an uncompromising and impassioned defense of the late French philosopher and historian Michel Foucault as a galvanizing thinker whose career as a theorist and activist will continue to serve as a model for other gay intellectuals, activists, and scholars. Illustrations.

Genres: Queer, Philosophy, Theory, Nonfiction, LGBT, Queer Studies, Academic

254 pages, Hardcover

First published June 15, 1995

Reviews

[simon · Rating 2 out of 5]

i liked this book slightly more before i learned more about david halpern's current work. before i heard a story from my classmate about when he said that eve sedgwick, queen of queer theory, was "a straight woman who likes it up the ass" and didn't have a right to write queer scholarship. fucker.

i learned more about foucault than i ever had before, which i appreciate. and halperin seems to be obsessed with ACT UP, though he completely erases the presence of dykes and other women in the movement, a practice he seems privy to in a large amount of his scholarship. he also writes about how foucault saw fist-fucking as queer liberation, which i appreciate - though he does so from an outsider, rather than a participant.

i'm trying to write this review about the book and not just about halperin, who recently was the keynote speaker at a conference my queer theory classmates put on at UW-Milwaukee. before they met him, they described him as a "bitchy old queen," and not in a good way. after he left, they just hated him because he was completely ungracious, unkind and misogynist.

'hagiography' means to write the life of a saint, and halperin surely did this with his do-no-wrong praise for foucault and his intertwining of his life practices and his philosophy/scholarship. like halperin, i am dedicated to this model of life praxis, and i appreciate his defense of this model. but why such an ass hole?

[Robert · Rating 5 out of 5]

this is an important text on both an academic's love of foucault and foucault's articulation of 'friendship as a way of life' and what i would say, following foucault, a queer aesthetics-as-ethics of existence, as a way of stitching together a 'queer life,' which is also an artful, aesthetic life. this is not just a text on an important thinker (both foucault and halprin), but also an important text on the importance of thinking, writing, living, learning, and being-with/for others, other-wise.
i decided to re-read this text while reading halprin's new text: How to Be Gay -- which is how one may variously become (which does not end) queer. indeed, being gay (or, better, queer) is NOT isomorphic with having same-sex eroticisms, desires, or performing acts.
haprin is an important figure in the thinking of sexuality and gender -- for over 20+ years now.

[Andrew Shaffer · Rating 4 out of 5]

Overall, an excellent book. It’s divided into two main sections, preceded by a short introduction. The first section is on the queer politics practiced and advocated by Foucault, however much of it applies to the practice and theorization of queer politics in general. The second section largely concerns itself with the various biographies written about Foucault and, while enlightening, probably wouldn’t be of interest to a general audience.

After reading the book, I have a much greater appreciate for Foucault’s work, and I feel I have a stronger understanding of his ideas. Only having been previously exposed to snippets of various books and articles by Foucault, I had a basic comprehension of his vocabulary and thought, however Halperin’s book helped me to dive much deeper into Foucault’s mind and to see his ideas in the greater context of his life.

One of the strongest sections came from pages 29-35 as Halperin discussed various angles of the closet at some length. He does an excellent job of synthesizing various theorizations on the closet, as well as summarizing the common reactions to the closet. The other section worth reading on its own comes on page 62, when Halperin defines the positionality of the queer and defines it in opposition to homosexuality or sexuality in general.

The book is largely a response to critics of Foucault's life (his sexual practices, in particular), and some of the author's references are difficult to follow for those who have not kept up with these critiques, however the book will be of interest to anyone concerned about the marginalization of those who practice non-normative sexual practices.

[malinka · Rating 5 out of 5]

Brillant. Et puis ça fait toujours plaisir de lire l'éloge de Foucault.

[C. B. · Rating 5 out of 5]

As others have said, this is good just generally as a lucid perspective on Foucault's thought. But the unique appeal of this book is Halperin's astonishingly incisive and nuanced analysis of other people's analyses of Foucault. As a fan, it was sad for me to read his convincing argument about Edward Said's sub-textual homophobia when writing about Foucault, but I think he's completely right. So much writing on Foucault at the time Halperin was writing was inundated with prejudice. The way Halperin tears apart Jim Miller's The Passion of Michel Foucault is exhilarating... I found myself smiling at Halperin's own humourous pseudo-psychosexual analysis of Miller. There's so much life to this book, and it's a beautiful defence of idolisation.

[Tim · Rating 4 out of 5]

I've never read any actual Foucault, so I appreciated this brief and entertaining intro to both his ideas and (more importantly) his relevance. Halperin makes a good case for why Foucault's ideas are actually interesting, subversive, and why queer activists like ACT-UP have adopted him as their patron saint. Plus it is an enjoyable read, often funny, sarcastic, and never (too) inscrutable.

[astrid · Rating 4 out of 5]

Really good! While this may not be the most interesting book for those who aren't into queer theory/broadly intrigued by Foucault's thought, biography, and the scholarship around him, personally, I found it very readable. The first essay predominantly discusses queer politics, the possibilities for fashioning new ways of being through queer sexual practices and living, and specifically how Foucault can be considered to have influenced thought in these areas despite not having been a 'queer theorist' himself or somebody that necessarily discussed queerness extensively outside of the context of the LGBT press. Harder to understand, but perhaps more compelling and useful for a wider audience than the second essay, which specifically looks at 3 biographical works of Foucault and what they fail/succeed in doing. More generic interest can be derived from the implications for the biographies of queer people at large, and the way that 'perversity' labels are used to delegitimise those thinkers whose ideas are not compliant with those of the biographer.


"To be gay is to be in a state of becoming... the point is not to be homosexual, but to keep working persistently at being gay... to place oneself in a dimension where the sexual choices one makes are present and have their effects on the ensemble of our life... [T]hese sexual choices ought to be at the same time creators of ways of life. To be gay signifies that these choices diffuse themselves across the entire life; it is also a certain manner of refusing the modes of life offered; it is to make a sexual choice into the impetus for a change of existence."

[Grant Hartley · Rating 4 out of 5]

Ugh, fine. I'll read Foucault.

[Léo · Rating 4 out of 5]

Très bien très cool

[Marcello · Rating 5 out of 5]

Saint Foucault is the best book in order to understand the main aspects of the queer discourse.
I read for the first time Saint Foucault when I tried to figure out the true meaning of the queer theory in opposition to the so called "gay and lesbian tradition". David Halperin actually read Foucault with passion, and his personal feeling characterizes every single line of the first essay. The presence and the influence of Foucault in every single shape of the queer studies can be easily discovered in every single author. But, as it seems, Halperin is the only scholar who actually tried to explain why and when Foucalt became so important for the new generation of theorists. This book makes you look at the lgbt politics in a completely different way.
I honestly gave up reading the second chapter of the book, based on the biographies written on Foucault. The second chapter sounds a bit boring, the language is completely different compared to the way Halperin explains Foucault in the first section. Way less enjoyable.

[S. · Rating 3 out of 5]

Good...sometimes wrong, but good.

[epeesh · Rating 5 out of 5]

很喜欢对queer ethics的讨论，said exactly what I thought. 不过我们课上一个做queer literature的phd第一年男生说他非常不喜欢这本书，不过没展开具体说，不知道是因为我queer theory读的不够多所以我们态度不一样，还是因为我们在不同的文化语境下思考queer ethics所以态度不同。Halperin文笔真的很好，写的也带有感情，我特别喜欢里面对于sm还有拳交的讨论，关于在sm这样的预设权力关系中如何negotiate权力，如何通过pleasure来重构自我和他者的关系。当时读的时候脑子里一直是Wong Ping的热烈地亲亲爹地。不过这本书唯一让我比较疑惑的点是我很难想象如何在东亚语境下理解Halperin对福柯的解读。

[Emiliano · Rating 5 out of 5]

I didn't really think that a book analyzing the political context of the works of Michel Foucault would make me so emotional. An excellent demonstration of Foucauldian thought and probably a must-read if you're interested in Foucault and queer politics. Halperin has clear prose and a sharp tongue. Wholly defiant. I would like to read it again with a pencil in hand. Really really good.

[Gustavo Schott · Rating 5 out of 5]

Un libro que ayuda a separar al sujeto del autor y al mismo tiempo de su obra, no solo en cuanto se trata de Foucault sino de todos aquellos sujetos que han sido “cancelados” últimamente desde lo políticamente correcto.

[Nicole · Rating 3 out of 5]

In the wise words of a review from 10 years ago, “good, sometimes wrong, but good.” In better hands this would be even better. But I cannot separate the art from the artist, and Halperin hates women!!!

[Cooper · Rating 5 out of 5]

4.5

[Mikayla · Rating 5 out of 5]

fun. i’m now cautiously excited for history of sexuality, vol. 1.

[Lilou Grn]

Based

[Rome · Rating 4 out of 5]

i think its fun when nonfiction texts drop fuck into their sentences. this was SO interesting and i love the approach it takes to queer theory/politics/life. it really brought me back to the word queer and hiw it SHOULD be for years ive been thinking about a phenomenon i like to refer to as the buzzfeed-ification of queerness where queer gets used as this nebulous concept that somehow makes straight people more comfortable when thats the very antithesis of what queerness should be. i am not interested in the comfort of cishet people in fact i hope that my identity upsets them and makes them uncomfortable to force them to reevaluate their preconceptions about gender and sexuality! in a world thats so focused on gaining acceptance from corporations that see lgbt people as walking dollar signs this was such a refreshing read.

[Spicy T AKA Mr. Tea · Rating 4 out of 5]

I picked this up a few months ago and got really engaged with it. I then left it at my parents house. Found it and finished it. It is two essays, the first looking at the politics of Foucault's identidty related to his writing, activism, and sexuality. Halperin is really engaging and the essay went really quickly. The second essay is criticism of biographers of Foucault's who wrote in the authoritative voice circumscribing and controlling who Foucault was and what he did in complete opposition to the way he lived his life. Sharp, fierce, fun, and a pleasure to read, I do recommend.

[LT · Rating 5 out of 5]

If you want to read part of the book, I recommend the first major chapter. Called "The Queer Politics of Michel Foucault," it looks at the relevance of Foucault and his writings for queer folks, particular ACT UP activists in the 90s. The book feels relevant, though the writing itself is sometimes a bit wandering.

[Eamon · Rating 3 out of 5]

I was really looking forward to this book and it turned out to be a pretty bland introduction to queer theory and Foucault. Halperin is a better scholar and Foucault canonization is a better subject than this book suggests

[X108x · Rating 1 out of 5]

what a tool.

[ael · Rating 5 out of 5]

So much better than I expected!

[Nick Ramsey · Rating 4 out of 5]

This is certainly the most fun book I've read in years.