The Sacred Books Of The East: The Question Of King Milinda, Pt. 1

by F. Max Müller

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.

This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.

As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.

Genres: Philosophy, Religion

432 pages, Hardcover

First published January 1, 50

About the author

Friedrich Max Müller, K.M. (Ph.D., Philology, Leipzig University, 1843)—generally known as Max Müller or F. Max Müller—was the first Professor of Comparative Philology at Oxford University, and an Orientalist who lived and studied in Britain for most of his life. He was one of the founders of the western academic field of Indian studies and the discipline of comparative religion. Müller wrote both scholarly and popular works on the subject of Indology and the Sacred Books of the East, a 50-volume set of English translations, was prepared under his direction.

Müller became a naturalized British citizen in 1855. In 1869, he was elected to the Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres as a foreign correspondent. He was awarded the Pour le Mérite (civil class) in 1874, and the Bavarian Maximilian Order for Science and Art the following year. In 1888, he was appointed Gifford Lecturer at the University of Glasgow, delivering the first in what has proved to be an ongoing, annual series of lectures at several Scottish universities to the present day. He was appointed a member of the Privy Council in 1896.

His wife, Georgina Adelaide Müller was also an author. After Max's death, she deposited his papers at the Bodleian Library, Oxford.

Reviews

[Jim · Rating 3 out of 5]

There are basically two types of books about Buddhism: One uses few words to open up panoramic vistas, and the other uses a lot of words to shove you into a doctrinal or dogmatic rat hole. Unfortunately, The Questions of King Milinda Volume 1 by ed. and tr 1843-1922 T. W. Rhys Davids is of the second variety. This reminds me of these lines in a Zen poem written in the 9th century AD by Bai Juyi:

When there are no Scriptures, then Doctrine is sound.
Even should one zealously strive to learn the Way,
That very striving will make one’s error more.

This work starts as a series of questions put by King Milinda to the Buddhist sage Nagaseña, then progresses to what I can only think of a series of kvetches about things the Buddha said or did that appear to be contradictory. Even after Nagaseña “resolved” them, I still think they need to be resolved.

[Rakeela Windrider · Rating 2 out of 5]

The inconsistency of believing in transmigration, but not the soul, is inexcusable. The desperate effort to reconcile the contradictions in the teaching of the Buddha would not be needed but for the ridiculous insistence that the Buddha was not merely profoundly wise (believable) but actually omniscient (abusive). The display of ancient prejudices is made. The credulousness towards the countless stories is bizarre; was there truly a time when people did not understand fiction? The insistence on explaining away the ways in which the legendary enlightened ones didn't always behave according to the perfect supernatural qualities that enlightenment was supposed to grant them was noxious. The general anti-life attitude of Buddhism is also appalling to me. I am more in the tradition of being grateful for existence.

If I tried quite hard, I could extract wisdom from this book. That earns it a second star. On like account, I will not file it in my classifications as 'evil'. Still, it was not fun to read, nor was it enlightening.

[Chris · Rating 4 out of 5]

The Davids edition is a challenging read. It's constructed so much like Christian canonical texts that the material can be lost behind the form. However, it's more complete than another edition I was reading alongside, by Mendis.

[Philip Jordan · Rating 5 out of 5]

Great incite into Buddhism, Religion, & Existence. I Highly Recommend to those who are searching...