I received this book in exchange for an honest review.
This is the first book on a Read for Review that made me actually feel sick. It was vile beyond description. If negative stars were possible, that would be an option exercised.
LET ME SAY THIS CLEARLY: IF YOU HAVE ANY SEMBLANCE OF EMPATHY, COMPASSION, OR HUMAN DECENCY, DO NOT READ THIS BOOK! DO NOT READ IT. DO NOT EVEN CONSIDER IT.
This book caused me to break so many of my "reviewer rules."
I do not read other reviews before I write my own....rule broken
I read each book twice, once for content, once for character.....rule unable to be followed.
I do not read a review book quickly....I finished this one in under 90 minutes.
I do not form opinions until I am at least 50% through a book...my opinion was set in stone at 15%
Plot: A Louisiana prosecutor uses his position to enslave (not like in a traditional BDSM sense but actual human trafficking) the daughter of a man he is threatening to send to prison for what is likely a death sentence for a white collar crime (there is no sense that he actually broke any laws). The girl agrees and her life becomes a living hell that the author attempts and fails to make seem erotic.
Characters: Sinclair, corrupt prosecutor and slave master. Stella, daughter of man on trial and Sinclair's plaything. Other ancillary characters failed to make any impression because they were merely satellites to Sinclair and his twisted games. Because the characters are cardboard caricatures, there is nothing to say positively about how they are drawn. Sinclair is bare-bones wickedness, Stella is every stereotype of feminine naivety yet sexually performs like a trained monkey.
What I liked about it: If i had to pick something, it would be that, in some small way, Stella gets to give a gigantic fuck-you to Sinclair in the end.
What I did not like (buckle up, ladies and gentleman, because here we go):
1. Un-erotic in extremis. Isn't the primary point of erotica and romance novels to titillate and arouse? At no point in this book did I feel even a twinge of eroticism. Instead, I felt violent revulsion and disgust. If others find it erotic, I do not want to know them.
2a. Abuse of power. When you set your story in a real place, rules of reality apply. Stella merely could have recorded the conversation, taken the contract to the Attorney General and Sinclair along with the judge would have been the ones in prison, Sinclair becoming the prison pet of some very nasty people.
2b. Related to the abuse of power is the stereotyping of Southern politicians. When I read the description of both Sinclair and the judge, my first thought was that the writer had seen "All the King's Men" a few too many times and decided to combine that with deviant sexuality.
3. Blood and violence are NOT arousing. The beating he administers was hellish and regardless of the lack of *graphic* detail, a reader with even a twinge of empathy would be disgusted.
4. Irredeemable darkness. In no way does anything Sinclair says or does make me believe he actually values Stella as anything more than a slave. (Here, I look to other reviewers and marvel that they saw the opposite.)
5. Tedious. Tease your reader a little but get the damned plot somewhere. The "slavish" obsession with every detail of her abuse and his enjoyment of it was simultaneously disturbing and distracting.
6. The "cliff-hanger." Just end the damned story here.
7. The attempt to redeem "human trafficking" as somehow a romance theme. The author has clearly never worked with those who have been abused in this way. There is no redemption for those who traffic in flesh.
Here again, I violate one of my rules: This book made me long for the intellectual depth of the 50 Shades series. When Sinclair outright admits to enslaving others, I was prepared to quit this book. Dubious consent? Sure, that works. Slavery in a fantasy world (Sleeping Beauty trilogy, Gorean works, fan-fictions? These are unreal and the reader can recognize things as un-real). But this was set in real time and place, real people, and that was not acceptable for me. Even as I write this review, I am struggling with the feeling of having been befouled by this thing.
What would I recommend? Therapy for anyone who thinks slavery is erotic, criminal investigation for those who think human trafficking is a "romance novel" genre. I certainly would not recommend reading this book.
I have authors I count as friends who have had their books removed from booksellers for questionable qualities, and believe me when I say NOTHING they wrote approaches this in terms of of the evil, the darkness, the deviant nature, or the disturbingly detailed way the author writes of the complete debasement of another human being for the pleasure of others. I deleted this book immediately before I wrote this sentence, and, if I could, I would take something to remove any memory of it from me.
But perhaps what disturbs me most? The nonchalant way this twisted mess is presented as though it is just a "dark romance." I cannot convey the horror I felt as I read it. A person with even a slight amount of empathy would cringe in disgust from this book. But alas, we have a sequel.....which I would not read if paid.