It is widely believed that Hume often wrote carelessly and contradicted himself, and that no unified, sound philosophy emerges from his writings. Don Garrett demonstrates that such criticisms of Hume are without basis. Offering fresh and trenchant solutions to longstanding problems in Hume studies, Garrett's penetrating analysis also makes clear the continuing relevance of Hume's philosophy.
Garrett's focus on the cognitive psychology of Hume's philosophy is well-argued and an excellent tool in clarifying his ideas. Does a very good job at highlighting its strengths and limitations, especially in light of modern developments.