What do you think?
Rate this book
The Many Faces of Political Islam: Religion and Politics in the Muslim World
Analysts and pundits from across the American political spectrum describe Islamic fundamentalism as one of the greatest threats to modern, Western-style democracy. Yet very few non-Muslims would be able to venture an accurate definition of political Islam. Mohammed Ayoob's The Many Faces of Political Islam thoroughly describes the myriad manifestations of this rising ideology and analyzes its impact on global relations. "In this beautifully crafted and utterly compelling book, Mohammed Ayoob accomplishes admirably the difficult task of offering a readily accessible yet nuanced and comprehensive analysis of an issue of enormous political importance. Both students and specialists will learn a great deal from this absolutely first-rate book."
---Peter J. Katzenstein, Walter S. Carpenter, Jr. Professor of International Studies and Stephen H. Weiss Presidential Teaching Fellow, Cornell University "Dr. Ayoob addresses the nuances and complexities of political Islam---be it mainstream, radical, or militant---and offers a road map of the pivotal players and issues that define the movement. There is no one as qualified as Mohammed Ayoob to write a synthesis of various manifestations of political Islam. His complex narrative highlights the changes and shifts that have taken place within the Islamist universe and their implications for internal Muslim politics and relations between the world of Islam and the Christian world."
---Fawaz A. Gerges, Carnegie Scholar, and holds the Christian A. Johnson Chair in International Affairs and Middle Eastern Studies, Sarah Lawrence College "Let's hope that many readers---not only academics but policymakers as well---will use this invaluable book."
---François Burgat, Director, French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS) and the Institute for Research and Study on the Arab and Muslim World (IREMAM), Aix-en-Provence, France "This is a wonderful, concise book by an accomplished and sophisticated political scientist who nonetheless manages to convey his interpretation of complex issues and movements to even those who have little background on the subject. It is impressive in its clarity, providing a badly needed text on political Islam that's accessible to college students and the general public alike."
---Shibley Telhami, Anwar Sadat Professor for Peace and Development, University of Maryland, and Senior Fellow, Brookings Institution Mohammed Ayoob is University Distinguished Professor of International Relations with a joint appointment in James Madison College and the Department of Political Science at Michigan State University. He is also Coordinator of the Muslim Studies Program at Michigan State University.
---Peter J. Katzenstein, Walter S. Carpenter, Jr. Professor of International Studies and Stephen H. Weiss Presidential Teaching Fellow, Cornell University "Dr. Ayoob addresses the nuances and complexities of political Islam---be it mainstream, radical, or militant---and offers a road map of the pivotal players and issues that define the movement. There is no one as qualified as Mohammed Ayoob to write a synthesis of various manifestations of political Islam. His complex narrative highlights the changes and shifts that have taken place within the Islamist universe and their implications for internal Muslim politics and relations between the world of Islam and the Christian world."
---Fawaz A. Gerges, Carnegie Scholar, and holds the Christian A. Johnson Chair in International Affairs and Middle Eastern Studies, Sarah Lawrence College "Let's hope that many readers---not only academics but policymakers as well---will use this invaluable book."
---François Burgat, Director, French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS) and the Institute for Research and Study on the Arab and Muslim World (IREMAM), Aix-en-Provence, France "This is a wonderful, concise book by an accomplished and sophisticated political scientist who nonetheless manages to convey his interpretation of complex issues and movements to even those who have little background on the subject. It is impressive in its clarity, providing a badly needed text on political Islam that's accessible to college students and the general public alike."
---Shibley Telhami, Anwar Sadat Professor for Peace and Development, University of Maryland, and Senior Fellow, Brookings Institution Mohammed Ayoob is University Distinguished Professor of International Relations with a joint appointment in James Madison College and the Department of Political Science at Michigan State University. He is also Coordinator of the Muslim Studies Program at Michigan State University.
232 pages, Paperback
First published November 19, 2007
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews
May 17, 2016
Helped me to understand the political side of Islam and the various groups I have heard about over the years. Gave me an appreciation for Muslims throughout the world.
June 21, 2011
As I was reading the book, I came to realize that this book can serve as a response to those who define Islamist groups as monolithic like the book I read by Walid Phares entitled "War of Ideas: Jihadism against Democracy" that he equated all Islamists on the same footing.
This book by Mohammed Ayoob tries to demonstrate that Political Islamists are not monolith. They are defined according to internal contexts. Even though Muslim Brotherhood is the parent organization of Hamas and Clerical state of Iran has direct connection with Hizbullah are still determined by the political landscape within their boundaries.
It is important to note that Political Islamists morphed into pragmatism like that of AKP in Turkey to which it adopted radical departure from rigidity to flexibility just to take a leap forward in its political participation in the country. AKP's political success can serve as model for the rest of Muslim world.From the other extreme, the author examined also the al-Qaeda network. This network is a small minority that its global terrorist activities are not directed by its leade Osaman bin Laden. Every segment of this network have significant independence. This suffices it to say the not all terrorizing acts are not directly correlated to its leader Bin Laden.
Another important to consider is the nexus between the Islamists and authoritarian regime to curb the influence of opposition like that of alliance between Mussharraf regime in Pakistan and Islamists party of Jama'ah Islamiyah and others. Also, the nexus between CIA and bin Laden during the soviets invasion on Afganistan. The U.S. interest here is to contain soviets influence. These alliances demonstrate the role of politics.
Political Islamists popularity can be attributed to the failure of the unrepresentative and authoritarian regime to cater that societal demands. The former don't solely speak for Islam but it stands for human rights. Domestic variable is not only contributing to the popularity of Islamist but External variable as well to which the unique interplay of domestic and international factors that continuously reinforce each other. Example of this is the symbolic relationship between the United States and clients state like Morocco, Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. Support of U.S. for these authoritarian regimes will secure their status qou. on the other hand, U.S. interest are also served.
From this book, we can comprehend essential points that emergence of the Islamic movements- may they be mainstream political Islamict or radical Islamist- is a reaction to the perceived hostile nature of the International system towards Muslim populations like the following points:
1. Policies of erstwhile colonial powers in the 1950' and the 1960s; the overthrow of the democratically elected Iranian prime minister Mohammad Mossadegh in 1953 after he had nationalized the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company in 951 to the Anglo-Israeli invasion of Egypt following Presidents Nasser's nationalization of Suez Canal in 1956.
2. The bloody war of independence forced on the Algerians by France's intransigent insistence that Algeria was a part of France.
3. America's current military occupation of Iraq has further convinced most Muslims that the United states is working within the same imperialist paradigm used in the Middle east by British and the French.
4. Unqualified support for Israel is also seen as part of America's strategy to create and strengthen proxies so as to better control the resource-rich Middle-East.
5. The support that Western powers have extended to authoritarian and repressive regimes in the Muslim world during the cold war and after United States has alienated the Muslim masses from the west and from the United States in particular.
6. Supported extended to the Shah of Iran. Propping up regimes like those of presidents Sadat and Mubarak in Egypt and kings Hussein and Abdullah in Jordan and collaborating with Saddam Hussein of Iraq to check the growing influence of revolutionary Iran in the 1980's.
7. Unstinted and unquestioning American support to Israel, especially to its policy of continued occupation and of settlement within Palestinian lands conquered in 1967.
8. American foreign policy that is characterized by double standards in relations to the Middle East.One example is that its supports for Israel's nuclear weapon while it opposed Iran's possession of Nuclear option and etc.
9. The American occupation of Iraq to overthrow Saddam Hussein under the guise of Iraq's possession of weapon of mass destruction which is not proven until now.
10. The American endorsement of the Israeli policy of inflicting highly disproportionate damage on Lebanon in July and August 2006.
It is sufficient to argue that Islamist agenda are just responses to the policies inflicted on the Muslim world and it puts them on to defensive side though others recourse to violent approach. Because of the internal and external factors, Political Islamist shifted their tactics and strategies. They were also given space to popularity in the presence of these factors. Another important to note here is that political Islamists mainly mainstream ones are not anti-democracy as others scholars and thinkers may think. To prove this notion is the radical transformation of AKP, Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, Hamas etc. to fit in political processes in their respective countries. Lastly, there is no single entity to represent the Islam or embodies the genuine model of Islamic state based on time of the Prophet S.W.A. The author expounded this on chapter 3, Iran and Saudi Arabia as self-proclaimed Islamic states.
This book by Mohammed Ayoob tries to demonstrate that Political Islamists are not monolith. They are defined according to internal contexts. Even though Muslim Brotherhood is the parent organization of Hamas and Clerical state of Iran has direct connection with Hizbullah are still determined by the political landscape within their boundaries.
It is important to note that Political Islamists morphed into pragmatism like that of AKP in Turkey to which it adopted radical departure from rigidity to flexibility just to take a leap forward in its political participation in the country. AKP's political success can serve as model for the rest of Muslim world.From the other extreme, the author examined also the al-Qaeda network. This network is a small minority that its global terrorist activities are not directed by its leade Osaman bin Laden. Every segment of this network have significant independence. This suffices it to say the not all terrorizing acts are not directly correlated to its leader Bin Laden.
Another important to consider is the nexus between the Islamists and authoritarian regime to curb the influence of opposition like that of alliance between Mussharraf regime in Pakistan and Islamists party of Jama'ah Islamiyah and others. Also, the nexus between CIA and bin Laden during the soviets invasion on Afganistan. The U.S. interest here is to contain soviets influence. These alliances demonstrate the role of politics.
Political Islamists popularity can be attributed to the failure of the unrepresentative and authoritarian regime to cater that societal demands. The former don't solely speak for Islam but it stands for human rights. Domestic variable is not only contributing to the popularity of Islamist but External variable as well to which the unique interplay of domestic and international factors that continuously reinforce each other. Example of this is the symbolic relationship between the United States and clients state like Morocco, Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. Support of U.S. for these authoritarian regimes will secure their status qou. on the other hand, U.S. interest are also served.
From this book, we can comprehend essential points that emergence of the Islamic movements- may they be mainstream political Islamict or radical Islamist- is a reaction to the perceived hostile nature of the International system towards Muslim populations like the following points:
1. Policies of erstwhile colonial powers in the 1950' and the 1960s; the overthrow of the democratically elected Iranian prime minister Mohammad Mossadegh in 1953 after he had nationalized the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company in 951 to the Anglo-Israeli invasion of Egypt following Presidents Nasser's nationalization of Suez Canal in 1956.
2. The bloody war of independence forced on the Algerians by France's intransigent insistence that Algeria was a part of France.
3. America's current military occupation of Iraq has further convinced most Muslims that the United states is working within the same imperialist paradigm used in the Middle east by British and the French.
4. Unqualified support for Israel is also seen as part of America's strategy to create and strengthen proxies so as to better control the resource-rich Middle-East.
5. The support that Western powers have extended to authoritarian and repressive regimes in the Muslim world during the cold war and after United States has alienated the Muslim masses from the west and from the United States in particular.
6. Supported extended to the Shah of Iran. Propping up regimes like those of presidents Sadat and Mubarak in Egypt and kings Hussein and Abdullah in Jordan and collaborating with Saddam Hussein of Iraq to check the growing influence of revolutionary Iran in the 1980's.
7. Unstinted and unquestioning American support to Israel, especially to its policy of continued occupation and of settlement within Palestinian lands conquered in 1967.
8. American foreign policy that is characterized by double standards in relations to the Middle East.One example is that its supports for Israel's nuclear weapon while it opposed Iran's possession of Nuclear option and etc.
9. The American occupation of Iraq to overthrow Saddam Hussein under the guise of Iraq's possession of weapon of mass destruction which is not proven until now.
10. The American endorsement of the Israeli policy of inflicting highly disproportionate damage on Lebanon in July and August 2006.
It is sufficient to argue that Islamist agenda are just responses to the policies inflicted on the Muslim world and it puts them on to defensive side though others recourse to violent approach. Because of the internal and external factors, Political Islamist shifted their tactics and strategies. They were also given space to popularity in the presence of these factors. Another important to note here is that political Islamists mainly mainstream ones are not anti-democracy as others scholars and thinkers may think. To prove this notion is the radical transformation of AKP, Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, Hamas etc. to fit in political processes in their respective countries. Lastly, there is no single entity to represent the Islam or embodies the genuine model of Islamic state based on time of the Prophet S.W.A. The author expounded this on chapter 3, Iran and Saudi Arabia as self-proclaimed Islamic states.
May 5, 2016
Ayoob's basic thesis is that the violence in the Muslim world is caused by autocratic governments and neocolonialism and furthermore, there isn't a monolithic political Islam, but rather all politics are national. It is a direct challenge to civilizational analysis like Huntington's Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. Ayoob ultimately overstates the case against any civilizational component to the current turmoil in the Muslim world and Islam's bloody borders. He also is rather sanguine on the prospects of successful transitions to democracy and the respect of international standards for human rights.
March 16, 2017
Essential, IMO, for understanding that Islam is Not A Monolith. Filled with info, but not so dense that you need years of background knowledge to get the point.
January 20, 2020
An invaluable introduction to the topic.
January 3, 2017
Goes a long way to explaining the interrelationship of democracy and Islam in predominantly Muslim countries.
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews