TL;DR: While better than Chainfire, this book is abysmally dull. Very little actually happens in it. It suffers greatly from middle volume syndrome. There is no real climax of which to speak, only a weak cliffhanger. The writing, itself, is horrible. This is not what professional writing looks like. This barely even passes as amatuer. There is a section which illustrates my point on showing vs. telling for me far better than I could ever explain it to someone, where something is told to us, over a vast amount of text, and then the exact same thing is shown to us, in a very brief, but extremely powerful scene. The contrast between the two, which come one right after another, really makes the point for me over why one is better than the other. The repetition and recaps of previous books are cranked up to 11 almost from the first page, and I feel that of this 600 page book, 450 pages of repeated dialog, unnecessary dialog and descriptions, and recaps of previous books can be completely removed, while leaving the core story of the book almost entirely intact. That is how much space this book wastes on completely superfluous text. When 75% of the text in this book can be completely removed without even changing the remaining text to make up for the loss, that points to an author who doesn't know what he's doing, and an editor that didn't even attempt to do his job. This book does have several genuinely good scenes in it, which only makes the rest of the book that much worse for the comparison. I cannot recommend this book to anyone in any capacity. This book is terrible, and anyone that had a hand in its publication should be deeply ashamed for their part in it.
The rest of this review is my notes that I took while reading. Rather than dignifying this poor excuse for a novel with an actual review, feel free to read through my random bitchings as I made my way through it. Keep in mind that I may bring up the same thing multiple times, as the same thing probably annoyed me at more than one point in the book. And also the spelling, punctuation, and grammar are not really up to snuff either. I've already wasted enough time on this book, I don't really feel the need to waste any more on prettying all of this up.
9% Done:
Wow, Goodkind just jumps right into the meaningless technobabble, repetitious, roundabout conversation, and the telling us of things that we already know right out of the gate, doesn't he? I'm about 60 pages in, and in those 60 pages, there have been about 5 pages of actual, relevant content. Richard's painfully long explanation about emblems just goes on FOREVER, and it is made even longer when those around him refuse to listen, so he has to repeat, and repeat, and repeat. The whole thing comes off as more than a little pretentious, to be honest. There's also a lot of telling rather than showing in these first few pages. I mean, you've got Nicci floating in a spell. And rather than illustrating what's happening through, you know, WHAT'S HAPPENING, we go through this long, meandering explanation of it, where Nicci is just frozen in midair, while everyone stands around and explains what's happening. Here's the thing about telling rather than showing. IT'S FLIPPIN BORING!!!!! A scene that SHOULD be very tense and fast-paced as Richard realizes something is wrong, while Nicci is literally being torn apart from the inside out, is, instead a slow, extremely dull, long-winded, over-analyzed, and talked to death expanse of literary vomit that is a chore to read. How did I ever think this was a good book?
17% done:
.......................
Like, seriously? Did we need a further 40 pages of Richard pretentiously lecturing older and wiser people, who are now suddenly idiots because the plot says so, about emblems? Really? Because I kind of got it the first time around. Seriously. Richard explains it in extreme and condescending detail before the action scene. Then he explains it again in extreme and condescending detail DURING the action scene. And then, if that wasn't enough, Zedd comes to him afterward and says, "Bags, my boy, I don't think I quite understand about these emblem things you keep ranting about, please explain it to me again in extreme and condescending detail." (Notice how I wrote dialog truer to this character's speech patterns than the actual creator of the character did anywhere in this book by the way.) And Richard says, "Ohoho, sit down, old man. I have not yet BEGUN to explain things in extreme and condescending detail to you." It's not just insulting to the intelligence of the readers, it's also insulting to the intelligence of the characters. I mean, really? Not only Zedd, but also a thousand-year-old Wizard and his thousand-year-old jailor have never heard of emblems before? Really? This is a brand new concept in this world, which No one has ever thought to bring up until Richard came along and said, hey wait a minute, there's a pattern in there, I think I'll call it an emblem? Is it possible for a man to shove his head so far up his own ass that it pops back out the other end where it belongs? The concept seems to defy all logic and physics, buuuuut I think Terry Goodkind may just have actually accomplished it.
At least the action scene was directly described to us first hand, unlike pretty much every single one that happened in Chainfire. However, it is intercut with ridiculous amounts of completely unnecessary exposition, and roundabout conversations about emblems that just go on, and on, and on, forever. Seriously, like 80 of the first 100 pages of this book are richard saying the exact same three sentences about emblems over, and over, and over, and over, and over again. It's mind-numbing. There cannot have been an actual, professional editor that worked on this book.
55% done:
Okay, so, there is an extremely strong lesson on the power of showing versus telling in this book. You could use this book to teach the difference in a classroom, and why one is good, and the other is bad. I mean it is freaking amazing. So we have a good 60 pages of Shota and Jebra TELLING Richard all about the horrors that fell upon Galea from the Imperial Order. It is long. It is boring. it is very dry. And all you can see in these words are the voice of the author, not the voices of the characters. They over-describe things in such excruciating detail that it is highly uncomfortable to read, and pretty mind-numbing on top of it. AND THEN, Shota shows Richard a vision of what it was like to be one of these people suffering the horrors firsthand. This is a very short scene, about five pages long. And it SHOWS us everything that they just spent 60 pages TELLING us in vivid, brutal detail. I mean, when Goodkind is good, he is REALLY good. This vision drives home the point of how evil the enemy is far better, and far more firmly than any amount of characters recounting horrible things that they saw happening to nameless, faceless people ever could. Because it shows exactly what's happening, but it uses characters that we know and care about, and it's all described to us firsthand. It is a thing of beauty. Terry Goodkind CAN be an excellent writer when he puts his mind to it. The problem is that he rarely puts in the effort to do so. So here's the question. Would you rather read 60 pages of someone describing these things in excruciatingly dull detail, in such a way that you can tell that it's the author talking, and not the character. Or would you like to read a 5 page scene that drops you right into the middle of the horror so that you can see and feel it yourself? One of these is a very effective and emotional way of doing things. The other is dry, boring, long-winded, and reads like a history textbook. The real problem here, is that Goodkind included BOTH OF THEM in the book, one right after another. If you're going to show us something, you DO NOT need to also tell us. The whole 60 pages of Jebra and Shota telling us all about things in Galea can be removed completely, and it would make the vision that Shota shows Richard even MORE impactful. Again, where was the editor? There should have been red ink crossing out that entire section on one of the early drafts so that it could be removed early on in the writing process. I'm a once professional newspaper columnist/editor. I have never done this for a living. It's always been additional income. How is it that I am more competent than a professional novel editor for a very well-known, and much-acclaimed publishing house?
And then, to make things worse, right after the vision, they go right back into telling us all about it again for another 20 pages or so. Good god, man. You have 80 completely superfluous pages of dialog that can be dropped from the book right there, and it would make the book better, while still imparting the exact amount of information, but in a far more powerful, and emotional way.
Also, the repetition in this section is insane. For every line of original dialog, there are seven or eight more of characters saying, "no, it can't be like that." "But it is, let me repeat that for you to make my point." The repetition stretches into the next section of the book, where Richard sends his army down south to commit acts of terrorism and war crimes against civillians. Because he's so much superior to Jagang (who is doing the exact same thing to his people). Just, I mean, how hypocritical can Goodkind be? Does he truly not understand how moral authority works, or does he just think we're stupid and will never think to question. I remember thinking this part was pretty badass back when I first read this book, but now that I'm a lot older, and have seen a fair amount of similar attrocities in the real world, I find it rather sickening that this is being held up as the only right and moral thing that Richard can do at this point. You have no moral high ground to stand upon when you order an army to murder innocents. Period. You are as bad as the enemy you are fighting to stop from doing that to your own people. Period. Setting that aside, it might have been a good speech if he had condensed it down by about 1/3 or so. As it is, there is just way too much repetition in it to be a very powerful or moving speech.
And then we get into recaps under the guise of Richard asking Berdine all about what she's been researching. I see what you're doing there Goodkind, and it's really clumsy. Also, if Darken Rahl had a copy of a book that explains exactly how everything concerning the magic of Orden works, what did he need Richard, and the Book of Counted Shadows for? Seems a little continuity breaking there. Just sayin'.
87% done.
Okay, I really like the part with Richard after he loses his magic. The Slyph brings him to an emergency exit, and then he has to figure out a riddle left by Baracas for him. It's pretty well paced and doesn't repeat itself too much. It's Richard, alone, and without any magical powers, using his wits to solve a problem. When you strip all of the self-righteous garbage out of the story, Richard putting his mind to a problem is a pretty entertaining thing to read. Especially since this section seems extremely self-aware, which kind of made me laugh. It was actually a pretty clever sequence that pokes fun of people in fantasy stories having to solve riddles and mysteries. And Richard is just completely annoyed that he actually has to do something so cliche to move on. It usually annoys me when an author is clearly winking at me, but this one seemed less out of a sense of look, see what I did there, aren't I clever, and more that he was laughing along with me in good fun.
I also really liked the part with the Night Wisps. It's creepy, with a really cool atmosphere. The Night Wisp forest is really well described, and you can really feel the weight of how old and legendary this place is. This section also sheds light on Richard's childhood, and the reasons his mother died. Again, when Goodkind is good, he is REALLY good. But this is like 40 pages out of a 600-page book. Less than 10%, even when you add in the vision Shota showed Richard to the count of good writing vs. bad in the book. Also, If Goodkind is capable of creating such a creepy, forbidding place and atmosphere in his writing, why didn't he do it in Severed Souls? You know, where he basically flat out told us it was creepy, and did nothing else other than that to build up the sense of it.
But, alas, the good part of the story was over far too fast, and we go back to Kahlan as a captive of Jagang. This section of the book really feels like Goodkind living out rape fantasies, to be honest. The sheer amount of sexual abuse hurled at Kahlan is just plain disgusting and offensive. It gets really, REALLY cringy. I like that Kahlan is continuously killing Jagang's bodyguards, and doing everything she can to fight back, but it's still a very uncomfortable thing to read, because it is really brutal to her. The repetition also returns in full force.
There's a part where Kahlan helps a young girl escape. It's a bit of a time-sensitive situation, because they don't know how long Jagang and the Sisters of the Dark will be occupied. And yet, the two of them have an extremely repetitious conversation that took up about 9 pages, and pretty much amounted to: "When I kill the guards, run for it." "Okay." AND THEN, the girl starts recapping the previous book for us. I mean, REALLY? Aren't there more pressing matters at hand? This is supposed to be a tense, and suspenseful escape attempt, and it's completely ruined because the two characters trying to escape talk it to death, and then start remembering previous books before they do it. Just the ridiculousness of them doing this when there's a very urgent need to get away... I mean, come on, man. REALLY?
In Chainfire, none of the action was directly described to us. It was all recapped second hand. Here, there's action. It is directly described to us. But it's like Goodkind feels the need to just sit around and talk his ass off, like he thinks it's building tension by doing so or something, before it ever actually happens. I suppose it's a step up, but only a fractional one.
100% Done:
The book concludes with a torturous stretch of technobabble, repeated dialog, and recaps of previous books, because there sure hasn't been enough of THAT in this book yet. There isn't much of a climax here, just a very weak cliffhanger. Look, I don't care what the volume number is on the book you're writing. That book better damn well have a climax to it. Otherwise what is even the point of reading it? Saying "oh, it's just the second book of a trilogy, it doesn't need one," is no defense at all. If your book is fictional. And comes to an end. That end MUST be climactic in SOME way. It doesn't have to be a world-shattering action scene. It can be a quiet, yet powerfully emotional moment. This book had neither, or really anything between.
The writing itself is very poor. And I'm not even talking about the repetition. Just the way it is written is very unprofessional. When I was working as a newspaper editor, we would get many, many, many articles written by freelancers hoping to sell one to us. It was very easy to tell which of them had any journalistic experience, or any writing experience. Once you've been doing it for a while, you can just tell by the way they structure sentences, and by their word choices. If I did not know any better, I would say that this book was written by a high school student with dreams of writing the great American novel on his first shot, without having built up the skills, vocabulary, and technical knowledge required to actually write a book. The way almost every single sentence in this book is worded screams LOOK AT ME, I AM AN AMATEUR, I DON'T HAVE ENOUGH EXPERIENCE TO KNOW WHAT I AM DOING WRONG, OR EVEN THAT I AM DOING ANYTHING WRONG IN THE FIRST PLACE. That any editor worthy of the title actually signed off on this book makes me laugh. Whoever it was should be absolutely ashamed of himself. And I hope that he was fired for it. Because he has no business editing for a big publishing house. I know that Terry Goodkind is rumored to be a very difficult and obstinant author to work with, but that is no excuse for this mess of a book.
In the end, there were a few genuinely good scenes in this book. But you can literally cut about 450-500 pages out of it. Because those 450-500 pages are filled with nothing but space fillers. Words that sound like they mean something, but when actually scrutinized add nothing to the story. There is so much unnecessary filler in this book, endlessly repeated dialog, scenes that go nowhere and serve no purpose to the overall plot, conversations that don't work toward the building of plot or character, repeated use of dialog to recap events in previous books, huge swaths of text telling us about something, before a brief flash of showing us the exact same thing, and so on. This book is a mess. It is an absolute mess. There is never once in this entire book where a character speaks, and I hear the character's voice. All I can hear is the author speaking to me. There is no life, or personality in any of them. They are all reading Goodkind's script in a bland monotone, and with his voice. Goodkind has, yet again, failed to capture even the barest minimum of humanity in his characters to make them feel like actual people. There is not once, in the entire book, that any of them actually feels like an actual person, with realistic dialog, actions, reactions and thoughts. This is not how people think, speak, act and react. This book is a soulless, lifeless husk of a story, filled with very little of meaning or value. I can't reccomend it to anyone. Not even to people who enjoy the series and have made it this far. This book is an attrocity against literature.