And here you thought you were cutting the grass because you enjoyed the exercise!
Paul Robbins’ book, Lawn People, takes a political ecology approach to the relationship between lawns (specifically, turfgrass) and the people who, willingly or otherwise, cultivate and maintain them. He goes beyond ecological implications to unpack the motivations that lead individuals to pursue the lawn ideal, arguing that the lawn conjures its own agency, compelling homeowners to participate in activities that otherwise contradict with their beliefs. His focus, the (upper) middle-class, educated, homeowner, is, he argues, a mess of contradictions; simultaneously knowledgeable enough to recognize the damaging ecological effects and risks posed by chemical lawn care but willing to overlook them, despite that cognition. In short, the relationship between chemical use and the demographics of residents follows the opposite of expectations.
It is this mess of contradictions that Robbins interrogates, suggesting that apolitical ecological approaches to the relationship between grass and people fail to produce a comprehensive explanation for the incongruous behavior of participants in this façade. The actions of residents who provide chemical lawn care are not demonstrative of rational choices free from coercion but are, Robbins suggests, the result of both subtle and overt forms of influence exacted upon a confused consumer. Thus he describes the American Lawn as “a political and economic (and not solely cultural) object that by its design (and not by any form of ecological accident) demands inputs” (p. 71). This leads to behaviours (chemical consumption etc.) that are patterned by the “industrial logics of the lawn industry…the economic incentives that direct chemical marketing” (p. 71), and by simultaneous cultural demands that position the lawn aesthetic as a cornerstone of American values. It quickly becomes clear however that Robbins is not content to view the lawn solely as a static expression of culture (and indeed, whose culture is it, anyway?), but that he sees the lawn as a driver in the creation of cultural subjects, established, in part, on the basis of a long history of species interaction in the New World (see Chapter 2) and on the basis of capitalism's necessary expansion (Chapter 4).
Enjoyable book. Not your standard academic fare. Relatively easy to get through. You can dwell on the science of hazards and the life cycles of grasses if you wish (interesting in their own right), but the most interesting contribution is the way in which the lawn (and its inputs) makes willing (and not-so-willing) subjects out of us. Also of interest is the way he ties in O'Connor's ecological contradictions of capitalism, suggesting that "lawn people are the ultimate logical participants" in this system in crisis, where capital accumulation and sustainability are seemingly irreconcilable. That capitalism is ultimately over-burdened and must consistently (re)produce new markets for its own expansion means a system in which consumers must be produced and a desire to participate in a culture (one which, in this case, aspires to a particular lawn aesthetic) is cultivated.