Really wish this (and the first book) didn't have so much swearing. Other things I didn't enjoy:
- Cathy is so anti
- William is difficult to like (in the first book, he's quite likeable at first, and then much less so - not because he's changed, but because the author reveals more of him, or some other reason, because the first glimpses are so different to the rest). He makes really bad choices, even when in control of his senses. The final awful incident in the second book is made without real reflection or consideration, and makes me feel like I couldn't ever respect him again, no matter what the author does with him. The difficult thing is that she makes him equivocal - he's more like a victim, in this story, but at the same time a semi-villain, and a semi-hero. I'm not sure where she's going with him.
These are pretty much our two main characters - hero and heroine - and they're not really likeable, except in spurts.
- The 'Society' is portrayed as quite one-dimensional - pretty much all stuffy, prideful, ridiculous, insincere, competitive, and so on. Like all the bad things have been taken from the last 400 years or more, without any of their redeeming qualities. It's unsatisfying and make the story more difficult to believe, because no society is really like that. Sure, some have been very bad, but usually, there's always a mix of good and bad, sincere and insincere, hateful and loving, compassionate and stuck-up, ignorant and aware. This one is just too one-sided, and Cathy seemingly the only one who really cares and has the righteousness of justice.
What I did enjoy:
- The story is interesting, aside from those things; there's mystery, intrigue, magic, and curious or fascinating details of this split world system.
- Characters I liked: Sam, the gargoyle and Max (especially the gargoyle), and Petra. I even kind of like Lord Poppy, aside from the unpleasant aspects of his weirdness. The sorcerer is especially weird, but is obviously meant to be.