Utterly marvelous in every detail - - except one.
His initial work, The Case For Christ, Wallace makes a watchword of following the evidence wherever it leads, happy or not. "Evidence is neutral," i.e. it has no point of view and no bias. It's data.
But in this book the term "Naturalist" is synonymous with "chucklehead" and "counter to Christ." He's too diplomatic to throw terms around like "atheist."
The difficulty is that the evidence is neutral. Interlocking mountain chains of mutually corroborative evidence exist, all of it substantiating evolution as *fact.* A priori decisions to read Genesis with word-for-word honor, which pertains to the New Testament, trip over the vision of "heavens and earth" that GOD gave Abraham. I presume that people alive today don't argue with the notion that earth is a sphere spinning on a tilted axis. We see the sun "going around us" when in fact the spin, which defines the length of our day, only makes it look that way. We go around the sun, and the axial tilt gives us our seasons.
Moreover, the sun is a star one million times the size of earth. Psalm 19:5a uses poetic language when it says the sun emerges each morning from a tabernacle, likely going into it every night. No one asks us to believe in that tabernacle.
Yet sincere Christians, "Bible-believing," require themselves to parse the liturgy in Genesis 1 with the same detailed apprehension that we accord Christ's crucifixion and resurrection.
On the one hand we accept without a qualm details which Genesis chapter 1 can't get away with unless we add the caveat "looks like." The sun looks like it goes around us. Or in other words, Genesis isn't as literal, as word-for-word faithful, as we want.
Reading Genesis as though fully literal *still* *requires* *us* *to* *cheat* to help GOD's meaning become clear. And this, bluntly stated, demeans GOD.
Ahem.
There is no two ways about it. Either Genesis is literal, or our Hubble Space telescope, manned missions to the moon's surface, etc. amount to The Great Deceiver telling us, in effect, "Believe your lying eyes."
Wallace says in effect that "naturalists" who give the overwhelming evidence their full faith and credit are guilty of failing to "interpret" the evidence.
The Case For Christ didn't have to interpret a thing; everything laid itself out in black and white. Atheist Wallace followed it, listened, and realized that it said in neutral, dispassionate terms, that Christ's divinity and resurrection are *fact.*
So is evolution.
The challenge for actual students of GOD's Creation, which reveals more and more of its secrets year on year, is to follow where that leads.
(A) GOD made the Universe.
(B) GOD's Universe is vast; there are a trillion galaxies.
(C) GOD's Universe is ancient; "Let there be light" happened 13.78 billion years ago.
Therefore (D) evolution is not GOD's enemy, it's the knife He used to sculpt our clay.
This is hard to wrap a mind around; ask me and I'll spell it out in smaller steps. But the underlying truth is that Creation v. Evolution is the grandest possible example of the False Alternative. GOD is real, and so is evolution. GOD has made them fit; now it's our turn to develop our understanding of that great truth.
Wallace, man: follow the evidence; it's neutral.