Of course a book of symbolic analysis of Truffaut's work is going to make me emotional when it ends with a paragraph like "To spend some time in Truffaut's presence is to realize that his passion for art in no way diminishes his sincere interest in and affection for people. If he seems most alive when the conversation turns to cinema, it is really the individuals within and behind the moving pictures that he talks about. He has integrated the best parts of his masters by becoming a skilled craftsman in the manner of Hitchcock, a humanist poet in the manner of Renoir, and a generous man of letters in the manner of Bazin. If these people brought him closer to the cinema, it is equally true that their work then led Truffaut into their personal lives. For this lover of books and films, the primacy of the text has always been a function of the human presence preserved and communicated within it."
Also Insdorf somehow made me have a weird fondness for THE MAN WHO LOVED WOMEN as well as gives strong arguments for the legitimacy of A GORGEOUS KID LIKE ME as something worthy of analytical study, we stan <3