This is exactly what I was needing in my reading life these days, something quiet and mellow. No plot. No drama. Just being in the moment with nature and occasional deep thoughts. I can completely see how dull this would read if you weren’t in the mood for it. It was the perfect book to read at night before bed, very calming.
Two days ago the purple finches came back ..lovely to lie still and watch the wings coming and going from the feeders.
I went to bed at half past seven last night (it had been a long day), very happy to be in bed with a huge glass jar of pink birthday roses beside me and Tamas and Bramble on the bed. Who could honestly complain about a life such as this?
Yesterday I felt exhausted and only managed to write nine short letters in the morning -I used to do at least twenty on Sundays. Gosh, remember when people wrote letters all the time? I miss those days.
I know that I have a city personality and living anywhere rural would drive me nuts. Yet Sarton, being an excellent writer, made me long for her experiences of sitting in her garden in rural Maine, watching birds and picking flowers. Lovely! It reminded me of the Rosamund Pilcher book Winter Solstice, which is set in rural Scotland during wintertime. In real life, I understand what a miserable setting that would be for me. Nose running, fingers and toes numb to the cold, the early darkness making me depressed, the isolation and boredom….yet in that book I found myself longing to live in the village she was describing. I love it when a book can make me want something I normally wouldn’t want.
I have not said enough about what it is to wake each day to the sunrise and to that great tranquil open space as I lie in my bed, having breakfast, often quietly thinking for a half hour. That morning amplitude, silence, the sea, all make for a radical change in tempo.
Sarton does a lovely job describing her relationship with her cat and her dog, as well as all the wild birds she feeds. I got a real James Herriot “All Creatures Great and Small” vibe from the book at times.
Solitude shared with animals has a special quality and rarely turns into loneliness. Bramble and Tamas have brought me comfort and joy.
Tamas is a great help to me because he is waiting for his walk at half past eleven; my instinct to push work a little beyond a feeling of fatigue is short-circuited by a bark; I "let go" and enjoy the letting go. Tamas has done a lot to subdue the compulsive in me.
I googled Sarton’s house and discovered it was torn down a few years ago. Waaaah! However, upon further reading, I learned that the couple who had been renting the house to Sarton, when they died, their wills started a foundation supporting an artist retreat on the land. The house Sarton had been living in needed so much work that it would have depleted the foundation’s money. I think Sarton would be ok with the result. The foundation built a new building, ADA accessible, for four artists to live and work there. They kept the garden, Sarton’s beloved garden, and planted lots of plants in the foundation of her old house. The important part, creating and communing with nature, is still in residence at that location. Also googled the prices of surrounding houses. Hoo boy, very very expensive, I’m talking millions.
I knew nothing about Sarton starting this book and it is not necessary to have read anything by her in order to enjoy her journal. I did have to keep googling a lot of people she referenced. I knew the biggies like Huxley and Virginia Woolf, but not many of the others who turned out to be somewhat famous academics and intellectuals. I did find it interesting that everyone she was friends with seemed to be 20+ years older than her. The journals spans her ages of 62-64 and basically everyone she mentions as being a friend is in their 80s. The younger people she knows seem to be the children of those friends.
Sarton mentions several times random people appearing at her house because they are fans of her work. WTF. Was that ok in the 1970s? To hunt down the address of a famous person and decide to go visit them? She sometimes would begrudgingly invite them in for a cup of tea. With my years of reading true crime and watching true crime tv shows, all I could think of was serial killer or that Kathy Bates character from the Stephen King movie Misery. Sarton feels a bit guilty for being irritated with these people. I would have been livid and also freaked out.
Because it is convenient for the intruder, they intrude. It is then I wish I had a butler, a formidable one, to open the door and say,"Miss Sarton regrets-“ As I don't have such a factotum, I have to do it myself, and am rude. This time the person left in a huff ... and the result, dismay and fury on my part.
Every once in a while in the journal she references current events and for the most part they are pretty cringy. No, Mao is not a great guy. Yikes! I did google when did the West start learning about the nightmare of the cultural revolution and it wasn’t until after this book was published. It just goes to show that you don’t always really know what is going on in another country. She also worried a lot about crime and youth and how America was going to hell in a handbasket. Just like every single other old person no matter what era they live in. It was always better in the past. I did feel nostalgic when she mentioned watching Walter Cronkite on the news for the 1976 bicentennial. I was 8 that year. I recall when everyone listened/read the same news and we didn’t have the extreme polarization we have today(thanks internet!)
Always in the back of my consciousness is terrible woe and anxiety about the death of the spirit in our inner cities.
Violence has always been there, but now we know more and are confronted every day on the TV screen and in every newspaper by monstrous acts of vengeance perpetrated by human beings upon fellow human beings. Carol Heilbrun called last night and said apropos of this, "Yes, but it is better now because we do know." But is it?
I enjoyed all her musings on aging and solitude. As an introvert, her life sounded pretty sweet. Lots of alone time interspersed with hanging out with friends. However, I would like my alone time to also be with family, if that makes sense. Like alone time but others are in the house doing their own thing. Her concerns about not having kids, not having a partner, not having parents or it seems siblings or nieces or nephews did sound like too much solitude. Her fear of breaking a hip and not being found for days was a valid one.
Growing old is certainly far easier for people like me who have no job from which to retire at a given age. I can't stop doing what I have always done, trying to sort out and shape experience. The journal is a good way to do this at a less intense level than by creating a work of art as highly organized as a poem, for instance, or the sustained effort a novel requires.
I am over-extended. Time to pull in the boundaries and lift the drawbridge.
I feel sure that after sixty everyone has death in the back of his or her consciousness much of the time.
I mean every encounter here to be more than superficial, to be a real exchange of lives, and this is more easily accomplished one to one than in a group. But the continuity is solitude. Without long periods here alone, especially in winter when visits are rare, I would have nothing to give, and would be less open to the gifts offered me.
She wrote about her partner Judy having Alzheimer’s and dealing with that. Since my mother had Alzheimer’s I try not to read anything about it. I lived it, I don’t need to read about it. It wasn’t in the book too much. Judy lived in a nursing home and came to visit Sarton for brief holidays. Those parts made me think of my father and how he dealt with my mother’s decline. Also brought up fears of me or my siblings or my husband getting Alzheimer’s and how I will deal with that blow. UGH.
I have such sadness about Judy! She is going from me, from us all, little by little, and I feel helpless and often terribly irritated by her repeating the same phrase over and over as she does.
When one has lived with someone for years, as I did with Judy, something quite intangible is there, as though in the blood-stream, that no change in her changes.
Maybe growing old is accepting regression as part of the whole mysterious process. The child in the old person is a precious part of his being able to handle the slow imprisonment. As he is able to do less, he enjoys everything in the present, with a childlike enjoyment. It is a saving grace, and I see it when Judy is with me here.
Death comes by installments but sometimes the first installments can be very steep, perhaps much more painful to those around them than to the person.
The most difficult thing for me, of course, is that she is here with me but we no longer can share anything. I try to tell her what I am thinking about, but all the reactions now are superficial, glib sentences like, "How interesting!" when she is clearly not paying the slightest attention. After a few days I begin to feel desperately lonely.
As someone a few years younger than she was when writing this, she struck me as a lot older than me. Maybe I am delusional and I come across as old? Maybe it’s the era we live in? Those baby boomers really redefined aging for the rest of us. Maybe it was her friend group being so much older than her so she skewed older? Am I going to start dwelling on aging that much in 5 years? I guess I already do somewhat, which is why I found reading her thoughts on the matter to be interesting. According to actuary tables, I’ve got 22 more years left on earth. 2002 seemed like just the other day to me so that can be a bit freaky, thinking about average life expectancies. Of course, I could be hit by a bus tomorrow. I guess the key is to balance being aware of your mortality, accepting it, and also still being in the present moment, living your life right as it is happening and not worrying too much.
The basic pattern of a life changes radically when there is no one left, for instance, who remembers one as a child. Each such death is an earthquake that buries a little more of the past forever.
Because I am thinking so much about the past these days I have come to see that the past is always changing, is never static, never "placed" forever like a book on a shelf. As we grow and change, we understand things and the people who have influenced us in new ways.
The sixties are marvelous years, because one has become fully oneself by then, but the erosions of old age, erosion of strength, of memory, of physical well-being have not yet begun to frustrate and needle.
Very few young people observe anything except themselves very closely.
It is all so present to me that it is quite a shock to find old photographs and realize, looking at my father's stiff white collars and my mother's big hats, and her bathing costume which included long black stockings, how long ago it really was. I’m really starting to feel this. I look at photos from my childhood and realize how long ago and old it seems.
Sarton writes a little bit about feminism and women which I guess is what she is known for? She was born in 1912 and her perspective on women was a fascinating mix of eras. She was definitely ahead of most of her generation.
I thought, not for the first time, that the chief problem women have, even now, is that they have to be both Martha and Mary most of the time and these two modes of being are diametrically opposite.
These young women are determined to have children as part of a fulfilled life and to do original work as well. I admire them wholeheartedly. But I am always up against my own hard view that it is next to impossible to lead a fulfilled life as a human being and do original work of the highest caliber, if one is a woman.
She told me that one day when the cleaning woman was there, C. was in her room painting and she suddenly thought, "This is what it is like for David all the time." It seemed an extraordinary luxury to be able to work at her painting while someone else cleaned.
For years my mother buried her anger-and sometimes I think she was right to do so, because in his sixties my father was never going to change. Letting the anger out would have made no difference, only upset him, not led to a sudden vision of what he had failed to do and to be for her. So she beat herself inside-and he never grew up.
It is what makes me less than enthusiastic about a good deal of feminist literature at present. It is not either/or. It cannot be woman against man. It has to be woman finding her true self with or without man, but not against man.
If you are looking for a meditative, thoughtful, chill book to read before bed, look no further. This is it.
I have learned in these last years to forget the desk and everything on it as soon as I leave this room. The key to being centered seems to be for me to do each thing with absolute concentration, to garden as though that were the essential, then to write in the same way, to meet my friends, perfectly open to what they bring. And most of the time that is how it is.