I hesitated with how to write this review. Firstly, Brittney is gone, and not here to defend herself. Secondly, I've never (heaven forbid) had to watch my child suffer and die with a horrific illness. Third, I have no idea what it's like (again, heaven forbid) to be a single parent working full time and trying to raise a strong-willed teenager.
All that said, I have several thoughts about this book that may come across as harsh. If the author or anyone from the family is reading this, I do apologize- this is based on my impressions, nothing more, and I realize I could be very wrong.
Of course, I had heard about Brittney and her fight for a medically assisted death in the press, as it had significant worldwide coverage. I firmly agree with her that we should all have the option to refuse treatment and hasten death if we are facing a terminal illness , with no hope for meaningful survival. Thankfully, in Canada and in much of the states, due to Brittany and others like her, it has been legalized.
This book gave an in-depth, painful, raw account of Deborah Ziegler coming to terms with her daughter's decision to end her life in the wake of an incurable brain tumour. Alternating chapters flash back to Deborah's memories of her life with Brittany, starting when Brittany was born.
My first thought was that their mother-daughter relationships had the hallmarks of a co-dependent relationship; Brittany is called a "Velcro child" by a friend as she literally embraces her mom so tightly , and also because she is constantly with and reluctant to be separated from her mother. That's normal in toddlerhood, but this goes on as Brittany is in elementary school. I got the impression that Deborah had a lot of guilt about having to work full time, being divorced 2x, and Brittney's father not visiting her,so tried so hard to compensate by giving Brittany everything she could. Any parent wants to do that, but I think in this case, it got to the point where Brittany was extremely entitled. Deborah caves on pretty much everything Brittney wants, especially in her teens (the expensive Catholic high school, a car, etc etc), and as a result, Brittney, who is strong willed and incredibly bright, appears to be ruling the roost at home. Deborah feels she can't marry Gary, her boyfriend of five years, for example, because when Brittney was a preteen, she said she never wanted her mother to get married again. Of course, Deborah was reluctant to bring a stepdad into Brittney's turbulent teen years, but this went beyond that- she doesn't marry Gary until Brittney gives her the green light.
Brittney is a very rebellious and extremely disrespectful teenager. I disagree that she was having
"normal" teen rebellion; my mom and I locked horns in my teens, as did many of my friends, that is part of the developmental process- but I never would have talked that way to my mom, neither would my friends. I wouldn't have gotten away with it, for one. Deborah seems like a punching bag for Brittney.
Deborah decides , via her therapist, to allow Brittney to take her GED, and go to community college before University, bypassing the last couple years of high school due to a severe case of mono and Brittney's emotional struggles at school. Brittney works part time, but it's clear that Deborah pays for everything. She threatens to take away Brittney's car when she refuses to wear her seatbelt, but she doesn't. Brittney's breezy "just so you know.." instead of asking permission drives Deborah crazy, but she doesn't enforce it, letting Brittney basically do what she wants.
Deborah tries to explain Brittney's behaviour by referring to the changes the brain tumour had wrought in her personality, but to be honest, it seemed to me Brittney was following the same trajectory she started out with in childhood- she just became less inhibited with brain cancer. It got to the point where Brittney had to move out at age 16, as she was so disrespectful and verbally abusive. Deborah, again, is left holding the bag and paying her daughter's rent.
Deborah pays for Brittney's college- three times. She pays rent on apartments for Brittney, including securing one out for 2 months before Brittney even lives there, because Brittney wants to go to Costa Rica. I was flabbergasted. Firstly, that they had that kind of money (California isn't cheap!) and second, that Brittney continued to sail on the gravy train her mom and stepdad gave her. Brittney changes her career path several times up until she's 28..and her parents continue to foot the bill. I could see for her undergrad, maybe even grad school, but beyond that, it would have served her to
stand on her own for a while.
Brittney takes a whirlwind of trips around the world while being in school. She's a daredevil and an adventure seeker. Again, Deborah wonders if this was due to her slow growing tumour. I think it may have enhanced her impulsiveness, but she was the same as she had been long ago, before she had brain cancer. Brittney's boyfriend, Cash, breaks up with her after saying he can never do enough to make her happy. Deborah thinks Brittney's dissatisfaction and looking for something outside herself to make her happy is from her tumour impairing her brain. I think we can look back at the pattern of Brittney's early life, where she is basically given her every whim and financially supported to do whatever outrageous idea she has next, and see where that comes from. It was especially telling that Deborah gives Brittney her vehicle, outright, so she didn't have to walk in the rain as a nanny, and Deborah got a new vehicle. Brittney is an adult at this point.
It's tempting to spoil your child. I know, because I do it myself. Part of me wants to pay for everything for my kid when they're an adult, so they don't have to face the cruelty of the real world. But doing that wouldn't be doing them any favours. Again, I'm not a single parent and didn't go through with Deborah did, so am not judging her- this is an observation.
My biggest jaw drop was when Brittney's parents give her a large sum of money to use as she wants for her wedding, which is becoming more and more elaborate. Deborah states they won't give in to the extravagance- but also adds that the bride's family usually fits the bill. Maybe traditionally, but that norm has changed, and Brittney is in her late 20s. her fiance in his late 30's. I think they could have been expected to foot the bill, for the most part, themselves. Brittney doesn't thank her parents for the gift. When she is listing all she has to pay for, Deborah says she can use the money however she wants, and Brittney scoffs; "That was gone long ago." What? What a slap in the face!! I think I would have told her to pay it back after that. Brittney and her fiance, Dan, somehow pay for an elaborate wedding in Sonoma, CA (expensive) and Brittney's haute couture dress. (I can only imagine). Brittney has itinerant teaching and nannying jobs, so I wonder where the money is coming from.
When Brittney is taken to hospital and awaiting results , she talks already about how she wants to go to Oregon to die, before she finds anything else out. Maybe it was a premonition, or the medication talking, but she is insistent on this before it's confirmed that she is terminal. She keeps ruminating on going to Oregon to die and tells everyone over and over again, not considering how it's making them feel, getting angry when her mother cries. Again, this could be due to changes in her brain- but that attitude was there before. It's just amplified with lower inhibition now. It honestly seemed to me that Brittney had made up her mind that she wanted to have a medically assisted death before she even got the true prognosis.
After Brittney's craniotomy , she becomes obsessed with death, organ donation, and surgeries. She gets furious with her mother when her mother is very shaken and upset by Brittney discussing eye and other organ donation in a restaurant. She yells at her mother and stepdad when they ask her not to play graphic craniotomy videos during dinner time and to give them a short break from it. Brittney lashes out and - they apologize after she leaves for home in a huff. What? It's far from unreasonable to ask someone not to play graphic surgical procedures at the dinner table. I know they are worried about her, that they don't have much time left, and that Brittney's inhibitions are lower, but that doesn't mean you should cave to that behaviour and accept it.
I think it was very telling that Brittney was able to control and modulate her emotions around her friends, but not her parents or husband. While it's true that people tend to lash out at those they know won't leave, it showed that she did have control over what she said and did to some degree and wasn't totally compromised.
Brittney gets a home in Oregon (that her family pays for. I can kind of see it at this point, but..). She's bound and determined she will have an assisted death. I've got to say, I admire Brittany's tenacity, eloquence, and cool head when making those decisions- but it seemed like she jumped the gun a bit at first before she even knew for sure the tumour would kill her. It was like she became obsessed with death.
That's where most of the horrific, painful to read passages come in. Brittney calls her mother a selfish c u next tuesday, among other things.. Brittney rains blows on her mother's head until her stepdad and husband have to hold her back. Brittney screams that she doesn't want her mom to be there when she dies. She berates her husband and tells her mother she wants to divorce him. I know she's facing end of life and all that goes with it, but I was relieved when Deborah finally got the heck out dodge after Brittney rampantly abuses her. Deborah at this point has been driven to thoughts of taking her own life.
They reconcile, but Brittney gives strict instructions about how people can act when she's dying: no crying at all. Keep reading poetry. She makes Deborah promise she won't cry. I mean, I can see not wanting crying, but that's your mother. It's like she has lost all empathy and can't see from any one else's perspective, it's 100% about her. I know steroids , Dilaudid, and brain injury itself can cause these behaviours, but as I've said a few times before, Brittney was like this from the start. It's just that she has zero filters now and the added brain injury/drug side effects.
Brittney's written words are oddly incongruent with her spoken ones; they're loving, clear, and intelligent. I guess the part of her brain that controlled her writing was not as compromised as the one that governed speech- maybe. Brittney tells her mother and stepdad to go to Machu Pichu after she dies, and she will meet them there. The family spends time flying back and forth between Oregon and California, and Brittney complains that's not enough. I can't even imagine how a family without their financial means could handle this. I don't think they would have been able to do nearly as much as the Ziegler-Diaz families did. More power to them for having the resources, but it doesn't show a realistic path for others wanting to pursue death with dignity in another location.
Brittney finally passes peacefully, when she said she would, on Nov. 1, 2014.
Dan Diaz, Brittney's widowed husband, was troubled by Deborah's books and released a very carefully worded and respectful statement on social media saying that Brittney had made him promise that he would be the only one to tell her story, and that she knew it would be the hardest to get past her mother in that regard. While I agree that far too many imposters and news outlets were using her image without permission-she or Dan can't prevent her parents from giving their perspective on her life and their life with her. Or, they shouldn't prevent it, anyway. Dan says that there are several inaccuracies in the book, especially surrounding Brittney's final days. I don't think he could possibly know that, as a lot of the interactions took place when he wasn't there. I think it was probably very painful for him to read it (if he did) and he probably didn't like that she was cast in quite a negative light in most of the book.
But, that's Deborah's reality about the journey with her daughter. Only she can speak to that. I don't think it's problematic that she wrote it.
Brittney was also going from one extreme to another in her opinions near the end of her life; ie. saying she wanted to divorce Dan, she didn't want her mother there at her death, etc. She may have just made that statement when she was very angry with her mother. Or when her inhibitions were down and she wasn't thinking entirely logically. We will never know.
I think, at heart, Brittney was a complex person like any one of us. I'm stubborn and strong willed myself. I haven't always had the greatest interactions with those I care about, either, like most people. Brittney was a bright, talented, motivated woman whose life was cut too short. I think that Deborah was/is still ironing out their very push-pull relationship, and writing this was likely cathartic.
As an aside, I find it despicable that so many conservatives, including the Vatican, weighed in on her decision and called it reprehensible and morally wrong. The Vatican is king of sticking its' nose in where it doesn't belong, and this was a prime example. Not only was Brittney and her family non-Catholic, but the Vatican has zero say over USA legislation. They can't impose their version of morality on everyone else. I liked how Deborah made a statement declaring just that.
I know MAID (medical assistance in dying) in Canada, while legal, is still hotly contested, and every born-again Christian and Catholic seemed to be protesting and trying to block it. It's similar to the abortion issue (in fact, MAID is having a webinar soon talking about the parallels between the two.). I think no one should stand between a person and their decision to end their life in the face of a painful , horrendous death and/or an incurable disease, or whether to end a pregnancy or not. These are deeply personal decisions and often very difficult ones to make. People don't need religions chiming in on what they should or shouldn't do- especially when they don't even follow them.I think it's more "reprehensible" that the Vatican slammed Brittney and her family and tried to cause them some sort of existential guilt over her ending her life. I always say, we're far more merciful to our dying pets than people in many cases.
I commend Deborah for writing this book. I can't imagine how difficult this was for her, to relive all those painful memories. I don't mean to lower the boom on her: I can't say I would have been any better with my child. It was just worth pointing out that Brittney's complex and often negative behaviour at end of life seemed to follow her life's pattern that had been set in motion long ago.I also don't mean to disrespect her memory.
The book is well written and touching. My critique would be that the travel experiences and memories filled up too much of it so that it almost sounded like a brochure, but that's not my call to make; the author decides what memories to include. It also doesn't seem like they check their tremendous financial privileges, which can get annoying, as it's clear they are wealthier than the average North American. There's nothing wrong with being wealthy, but more of a disclosure that this isn 't everyone's reality, other than briefly touching on it, would have been ideal. I find too many books written by relatively wealthy people are like that, and it gets tiresome. I've often said that I'd love to read a tale like this where the people in it are of modest financial means, or less. But I suppose that most people struggling financially may not have the time, inclination, or means to write a book.
This is a very difficult read, but definitely one I recommend. I couldn't put it down once I started reading. I hope Deborah, Dan, Gary and all Brittney's family and friends are taking solace in the legacy that she has left the world.