I consider myself a rather down-to-earth, rational man who likes to rely on facts and verified information, preferably scientifically substantiated. Esoteric views are lost on me, although I am sensitive to religions as languages or instruments for dealing with parts of reality that you cannot grasp with a purely rational or scientific approach. So, this book poses a bit of a problem for me.
The chapters, written by the Hungarian physicist Ervin Laszlo himself, initially appealed to me, at least in part. His "vibration theory" contains elements that elucidate a number of problems that still puzzle classical science (such as: what came before the Big Bang? , or the contradictory phenomena in quantum physics). And his view on consciousness sure allows for a more holistic approach, in line with systems thinking, chaos theory and the thinking of Gregory Bateson. It's all very abstract, I agree, but certainly intriguing and stimulating further reflection. But then, the moment Laszlo started writing about the deep dimension of reality, about cosmic consciousness, and linked all this to para-normal phenomena such as “near death experiences, out-of-body experiences, instrumental transcommunication”, etc., I had to swallow. That's where my sceptical self immediately surfaced.
And then Laszlo’s text is followed by about 15 contributions from others, all "experts" I had never heard of, who praise the views of Laszlo extensively, adding their own thoughts in line with his theory. What they have in common is that they almost all advocate a paradigm shift (away from classical science, of course). Some of these contributions are interesting additions and deepenings. But it strikes me that the majority of these experts put forward their own theories in a very affirmative way, whereas Laszlo himself is much more careful and prudent. And with a number of contributions that go on the para-normal/esoteric tour, I dropped out completely, especially with those that advocate the intake of psychedelics in order to gain a more correct access to reality. And frankly, I also find the recurring claim that numerous borderland experiences (such as near death and others) have now been scientifically verified, not very convincing.
I don't know, maybe I'm too skeptical. Still, I don't want to just sweep everything off the table as nonsense. I am all too aware of the limits and one-sidedness of classical science, but it seems to me that there is still a very long way to go to that new paradigm that Laszlo and others are now so self-evidently proposing. Rating 2.5 stars.