This was a book that had a lot of potential but got bogged down by repetition of thoughts within a chapter and very bad design of chapters and sections.
It was irritating reading a book that starts off with a “How To Read This Book” section. It would have been nice if the author had given credit to the reader, teachers, to know how to read a book broken up into sections with “think and discuss” breaks. We get it. I also think that the appendix with it’s section on how to talk about equity with colleagues could have been one of the first chapters of the book, since so much of the book was focused on equity and seeing students as individuals in their own right with backgrounds valid and worthy of consideration when discussing their needs and struggles.
I did like the foundational image, about all of the people who interact with students during the day. It was a nice through-line throughout the book and it was great that it was not just referenced but shown again in the chapters that referred back to it.
The biggest concern I had about the book was that it really tried to make each chapter about equal in length, about 40ish pages, even if not all chapters needed that many pages. What ended up happening was it would then repeat a concept within the chapter as a filler. Or, that’s how it felt.
As to the content itself?
I do think that there are teachers who are not thoughtful or kind in their thinking about students. There are definitely teachers who need to rethink the stereotypes and accepted assumptions about why and how a student is the way they are. The first part of the book focuses on "flipping the scripts” of how teachers talk, with chapters like “group talk”, "inequity talk”, “smarts talk” and “culture talk” and then gave examples of of what teachers might think and say and giving examples of how and why we should change that thinking.
The second part of the book then focuses on the infrastructure of schools and the ways that a building can change it’s thinking and discussions about students.
It really asks teachers to rethink the very data you collect, how you connect with students through discussions with them about their lives, and the various opportunities you have to reach a deeper understanding of students and their needs.
Overall, I think there were a lot of good ideas in this book and if better edited and more concise could have been an excellent companion piece to the discussions of equity we have begun in our district. However, the end result of this book being so poorly written is that I would not recommend it to anyone. I’d be concerned that it would turn the very people who need to change their thinking and change their talk about students away from the very conversations in the first place.