Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Studies of the Walter H. Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center

Divergent Memories: Opinion Leaders and the Asia-Pacific War

Rate this book
No nation is free from the charge that it has a less-than-complete view of the past. History is not simply about recording past events―it is often contested, negotiated, and reshaped over time. Debate over the history of World War II in Asia remains surprisingly intense, and Divergent Memories examines the opinions of powerful individuals to pinpoint the sources of from Japanese colonialism in Korea and atrocities in China to the American decision to use atomic weapons against Japan. Rather than labeling others' views as "distorted" or ignoring dissenting voices to create a monolithic historical account, Gi-Wook Shin and Daniel Sneider pursue a more fruitful analyzing how historical memory has developed, been formulated, and even been challenged in each country. By identifying key factors responsible for these differences, Divergent Memories provides the tools for readers to both approach their own national histories with reflection and to be more understanding of others.

376 pages, Hardcover

Published September 7, 2016

5 people are currently reading
14 people want to read

About the author

Gi-Wook Shin

36 books2 followers

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
2 (20%)
4 stars
5 (50%)
3 stars
2 (20%)
2 stars
1 (10%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Pablo Molina.
13 reviews
April 7, 2023
While the book doesn't necessarily add anything new if you already know about the memory debates it's focusing on, it's still interesting enough. It helps you see that even within very authoritarian societies (like China) or ones with powerful right-wing nationalist establishments (like Japan), there is always divergence in opinion.

The main weakness for me is that the editing is a bit shoddy. Interviewees get fully reintroduced for unclear reasons, and there was at least one time where the same block quote was repeated in two subsequent chapters.
Displaying 1 of 1 review

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.