"Adored" is a dreadful book. Bagshawe is an unimaginative, creativity-challenged author who can barely assemble a readable sentence. I could stop there, but where's the fun in that?
First of all, I fully realize that "Adored" is a so-called "trashy novel". I didn't expect great literature or a life-changing experience when I picked it up. It was compared to "Scruples", a book I really liked 20+ years ago, so I thought I'd give it a shot. Please, shoot me. While I didn't expect great literature, I did expect to be entertained by a competent writer. That was my first mistake. My second was continuing to read even though I knew what a dog I had on my hands. It was so bad that I had to finish it just to make sure it was SO bad. Mission accomplished.
The story was unbelievable, the characters unlikable, and the writing undecipherable at times. In the 70s a legendary movie star (Duke!!) moves his mistress into the home he shares with his "long-suffering" wife (Minnie), and adult son and daughter (Pete and Laurie, and also Pete's wife, Claire). Yeah, sure. The mistress soon has a son (Hunter) who is ignored by his own parents and despised by everybody else in the house, until Pete & Claire's daughter Sienna is born 5 years later. Hunter and Siena become close friends. Pete hates his father, Duke. So why does he keep living under Duke's roof? Why put up with the torment of it all? Pete hates that Siena and Hunter are close, and that Duke and Siena are close. So why continue to live in the same house? Why????? Duke dies when Siena is 10, so Pete finally has a chance to have some influence on his own daughter. Hunter and his mother are kicked out of the house, and Duke is dead, remember? What is Pete's response? Send Siena to boarding school in England. WTF?? Claire, meanwhile, stands by and lets Pete do whatever he wants regarding Siena. Sends her to boarding school. Cuts her out of their lives completely when, at 18, Siena decided to pursue a career in modeling and acting instead of going to medical school. Claire doesn't like it, but she loves Pete so very much that she goes along with it. Why Claire loves Pete is a mystery. He's just as big a prick as his father, but in different ways. The story goes on, blah blah blah. Whatever. It is just so flawed, from beginning to end. There wasn't a single character I liked enough to even care how they turned out. Most of the men were jerks; most of the women were weak. Most of the time I was annoyed.
Did I mention that Tilly Bagshawe is a horrible writer? Honestly, I do not understand why this book was published. It seems like there was no editing done at all. I know that can't be true, so I shudder to think what the first drafts were like. Here is an example of some of the stuff that DID make it into the book:
1)"As long as you kept your head down and worked hard, he had always found him to be a fair and reasonable boss." Huh? Too much 'you' and 'your'; not enough 'he' and 'his'.
2)"...and the taxi drivers came in from Queens every morning with six inches of pure white icing on top of their marzipan-yellow cabs." Is that so? Sorry, but marzipan is not, by definition, or association, yellow. Like say, a taxi-cab might be considered. Something can be described as taxi-cab yellow, but not marzipan-yellow.
3)"The blazing afternoon sunshine poured down its life-giving energy on the orange and lemon trees that grew in every garden, overflowing with abundance and color, fruitfulness and life." Oh my god. Please, make it stop.
4) "....stood like gleaming sentinels at the foot of the biggest, most melodramatic staircase Siena had ever seen." Melodramatic staircase? Seriously, Tilly; are you trying to give me an aneurysm??
5)Page 115: "The school year had ended the week before and months of glorious freedom stretched ahead of both her [Siena] and Hunter". Siena then finds Duke dead in the kitchen. Page 121: "The first few weeks after Duke's death were a miserable blur to Siena"..., "She became almost indifferent to the paparazzi...as she got off the school bus each day..." Why is Siena on a school bus if there is no school? Plus, way back on page 107 it was established that Siena was taken to and picked up from school by either the nanny or her mother!! If I, a disinterested, casual reader am able to catch these mistakes in one reading, why can't the person who wrote it do so? Or perhaps the person who is paid to edit? Why does it fall on my shoulders to do this important work?? Wait, it IS important that I work late into the night to trash this 3 year old book that nobody cares about, right??
6)Page 311. Reading along about Siena this, Siena that. She she she. But in the middle of it, without quotation marks, or any kind of break, is "I mean, what did he have to do today that was so earth-shatteringly important that he couldn't spend five minutes talking to that stupid whale of a woman about how happy he was to be with her?" Me again. You see, I put quotes in because I'm quoting the book. Tilly, though, just decided she'd slip into the 1st person for one sentence. One portion of a sentence, actually, because by the end she had moved from "I" back to "her" (meaning Siena, not the 'whale of a woman'). It wasn't Siena 'thinking' a quote. Just "I" out of nowhere. Out of place. Bad, bad, bad.
7)Finally. Speaking of the 'whale of a woman'. In Tilly-land all you need to know about a person to hate them sufficiently is that they're fat. Duke and Minnie's daughter Laurie is "fat, useless". Well, Tilly, she's only useless because you don't have the imagination to make her anything else. The 'whale of a woman' is a journalist. Page 309;"..fat, garrulous middle-aged woman...";"..her blubbery jowls shaking."; "..her fat wet lips..". Page 310: "He hated journalists, especially fat women journalists." Page 313 "...the fat journalist". Thirteen(!!) lines later, she's still "The fat journalist..." Are you kidding me, Til? Is that the best you can do? Really, we get it; Fat=bad. Unfortunately for you, Tilly=bad writer.
Could I go on about why this book sucked? Sure. But I won't. I've barely touched on the plot. The glaring errors of the presentation jump out at me so much that I tend to focus on them instead of the overall badness of the story, though. I wonder what book didn't get published so that this one could be published. I wonder why somebody wanted to possibly stake their reputation in pushing this one through when it was so flawed. I wonder who encouraged the author to keep plugging away at it. I notice that her sister Louise Bagshawe is the author of several books; perhaps that has a lot to do with this one being published. Perhaps not. I wonder why I've spent so much time going on and on about it. I see that Tilly has written two other books which I have no interest in reading. I've suffered enough.