I've said when authors have had many errors in their works that even a very good story cannot get more than three stars from me with a lot of technical errors, and I'm sticking to that statement. Horrible head-hopping, record-breaking use of contractions for a JAFF novel, and a length that comes from redundancy will change a good plot and excellent prose into an annoying novel.
I write technical reviews that don't have a synopsis or much subjective analysis, just a check of those symptoms that cause readers to drop stars, yet are not mentioned by most reviewers.
- The plot concept was a good one, but the story arc could have been completed much sooner had it not been for redundancy of the concept of Darcy's navel-gazing on his perceived flaws and Elizabeth's parallel whining on her issues.
- The flow tended to be on the slow side, partly due to said redundancies as well as introspective passages.
- Angst was on the average side considering the subject matter, but the tension ramped up to high on several occasions when challenges were offered for the couple regarding the possibility of their getting together (no details here to spoil the read).
- Point of view was third person multiple with alternating point of view with no proper delineation or separation of the sections where the point of view character changed. In fact, the point of view character changed within paragraphs at times, and frequently, it was difficult to discern whose head we were in, definitely requiring re-reading for dozens of locations. It was one of the worst examples of head-hopping I've read in a long time.
- Some telling language was used, with a few filter words, where showing language would be preferred.
- The book had nice prose with slightly above average utilization of non-Regency words and modern phrases (ten) and Americanisms (seven), and there were eight occasions where the wrong word was used, also above average for a JAFF novel. However, most JAFF novels have under five contractions, and those are usually given to lower class or silly people like Austen used them. In this book, I was distracted from the era by contractions no less than 86 times (and those were only the ones I noted). This is a record for my reading of JAFF, and it smacks of either a very amateur author (where most of the rest of the writing save the head hopping does not) or a very lazy author who was too cheap to get a good editor. Shame on you, Timothy Underwood. It's your book that makes the rest of self-published JAFF get painted with the brush of poor editing when most other JAFF authors hire decent editors to get a good to excellent product.
- The errors went on to punctuation, where no less than 15 blatant errors were detected, and I'm no punctuation expert--a proofreader might be able to find more.
- Little errors in writing and history also put the reader off, such as the protagonist being unable to see herself blush, or a Regency error like Lady Catherine being called "Cathy." That would never happen--it's insulting. In the Regency, only peers can obtain special licenses, and it took a week even if the groom was in a rush. Parliament took specific breaks such as Easter, not willy-nilly days off as the book seemed to decide. The author should have consulted Hansard for break times that Season.
- Excellent scene-setting was sprinkled throughout the book, and not merely as introductory scenes or descriptive breaks, but throughout. The author definitely is gifted in keeping the minds of the reader filled with a picture of what's happening for the characters. The prose quality and descriptions lead to a great atmosphere.
- At the outset of the novel, the characterization was excellent, but that of the protagonists deteriorated to caricature-ish later in the story, where Darcy was far too obsessed over a single issue and Elizabeth was too whiny and dependent on Darcy. Although these were characteristics that Austen used for these two characters in places in P&P, in my opinion, they were overdone near the end of this novel.
- Dialogue was well done without too many inappropriate tags.
- The romance development was paced appropriately, showing us the heart of each protagonist, and making it clear that they were in love at a fairly early point in the book, yet not too soon, but using obstacles to break the completion of the romance and add to the dramatic tension.
- I don't care for the cover quality. The subject material is good since it shows the story, but the focus is out on the man, and the images look pasted together. The colour is drab as well. The man in the image looks depressed, which is off-putting even if it shows the story. Those aspects of this book won't stand out at all among all those other covers that Pop and say "Buy me." The fonts are well done and the scale is good for an Amazon thumbnail.
Under all those technical errors and the redundancy, this is a quite a good story. The author definitely has some strong skills in prose with evocative descriptive sections that are better than average, but that doesn't make for a great book if paired with amateurish words or style that knock the reader out of the era at a rate of one every few pages. I do hope the author pays attention to the head-hopping especially and gets a good editor for the other issues because his books have potential to be great.
Disclaimer: I'm a JAFF author, and some might say this review is a conflict of interest. However, I was a reader first, and I my reviews are honest and impartial. I write them for both the reader and the author.