Many hold that the transition from Hegel’s materialism to Marx’s materialism signifies a progressive development from an abstract-idealist theory-of-becoming, to a theory of the concrete actions of humans within history. A Failed Parricide offers an innovative reading of this transition, arguing that Marx remained structurally subaltern to Hegel’s conception of the subject that becomes itself in relation to alterity.
Western Marxists can say what they will about the vapidity and dogmatism of Soviet Marxist texts, and sometimes I agree, but at least they attempted to make them understandable. Finelli's prose is more obscurantist than Hegel or the "young" Marx. Thomas should have written a translator's preface or something. The chapter on Feuerbach is very good, though.
It will take me some time to figure out whether I agree with the main arguments of the book. Also, I think that I can't really definitively pass judgement on A Failed Parricide until I've read its sequel, A Completed Parricide, which hasn't been translated into English yet. I'm giving this 5 stars not as an endorsement of all of its conclusions, but rather because I think it raises some very productive questions, and because I learned a lot from reading it.