Mark Puls' Samuel Adams: Father of the American Revolution is a quick read. It provides a useful sketch of one of the Revolution's major figures--Samuel Adams.
The book takes a chronological perspective, beginning with Adams' childhood and the experiences with his father, a well regarded local businessman (including owning a malt shop) and community leader (becoming a deacon in his church and a member of the legislature).
The story continues with his education and efforts to make a life for himself. He was not overly ambitious for economic success and, after his father's death, essentially saw the family brewery go bankrupt. Nonetheless, he hustled and was able to make ends meet, although times were often tough for him and his family.
Early on, Sam Adams became discontented with aspects of the Massachusetts colony's relationship with England, the King, and Parliament. He was one of the leading agitators in the 1760s and 1770s. He was developer of several innovations, such as the Committees of Correspondence throughout the colonies, a mechanism to enhance communication across boundaries. He was involved in many of the key activities leading to the Declaration of Independence and the Revolutionary War, including urging a Continental Congress, fighting against English taxes, seeking the naming of George Washington as the general officer to lead the colonial forces in the siege of Boston. The biography continues with his role in development of the first constitution of the United States, the Articles of Confederation, as well as his part in the ratification of the Constitution itself.
This is a serviceable biography. However, it does have a couple problematic aspects. For one, the author tries to "get inside his head," making assumptions about what Adams was actually thinking. Biographies that minimize this tend to flow more smoothly, without imposing authorial assumptions onto the historical figure. For another, the biography has little critical cast on Adams. He is essentially treated so positively that one wonders if he had any peculiarities or annoying habits or made important errors. It is clear that some distrusted him mightily from other volumes; however, this does not really get discussed in any detail in this volume (although his falling out with John Hancock is addressed). The book also glosses over some important events, such as his complete turnabout on the Constitution. It portrays him as opposed to the document in the Massachusetts ratifying convention, only to turn around and support it. The author provides little discussion to explain this volte face.
In the final analysis, though, this is a useful biography of one of the colonial leaders who worked hard to move the colonies toward independence.