(I read the Swedish translation of this book. The quoted paragraphs are my translation back to English.)
I seriously don’t know who this book is for.
At first, I thought it was a book for people who are curious about physics but aren’t particularly knowledgeable about it. I’m in that category and was hoping to have some of the basic concepts of physics explained in a clear fashion. That’s not what this book was.
This book was like the worst type of school textbook – one where the authors seem to think that if you just mention enough obscure concepts and esoteric terms without explaining them fully, you’ll arouse interest in the reader.
For instance, the book assumes that you know what quantum mechanics is – it mentions it many, many times but never tells you what it is. You just have to know it beforehand.
The blurb claims that this book is the fastest way to become certain about the Uncertainty Principle. I get that it’s sort of a joke, but a statement like that should also be based in fact. However, when you read about the Uncertainty Principle, you run into this: “One consequence is that a particle’s total energy can fluctuate with an amount E for a short time t as long as the product E times t does not exceed Planck’s constant divided by 4π.” This doesn’t make me certain about the Uncertainty principle, not in the least.
In the chapter on “Weak interaction”, a subject I knew a bit about, you get gems like this: “Weak interaction is transferred by W or Z bosons, which are about 90 times as heavy as a hydrogen atom but apart from that are similar to photons in QED. It’s the large amount of energy required to materialize a W or Z boson that limits the weak interaction at low energy levels.”
The glossaries that precede every chapter don’t seem to be intended to make the reader understand the terms. Take “spin” for instance: “The spin of a quantum particle is one of its characteristics. Even though the model is built upon angular motion, it’s not really about rotation. The spin has values which are multiples of ½ and a direction which is quantified. For instance, if you measure the spin of a particle, it will always be either ‘up’ or ‘down’ in the direction the measurement was made.” Is this supposed to make something clearer?
Not all of the texts were this complicated, but many of them seemed like the authors felt compelled to show off their in-depth knowledge. The fact that the illustrations, while pretty, don’t explain anything at all, makes matters even worse.
I would not recommend this book to anyone, and I feel sorry for anyone who picked up this book in the hopes of finally understanding something about the often convoluted subject of physics.