Never have I ever ... been so exasperated by a novel.
I feel like I've started to read Chitra Banerjee Divakaruni's books out of habit, and out of hope that one of them will be as amazing as The Palace of Illusions, one of my all time favorite books. This latest one felt like half a novel -- extremely annoying, as it was good, and I would have loved to read the complete story. The story covers three generations of women (Savitri, Bela, and Tara) and the way their lives intersect, and affect each other, even without them being fully aware of it. The story kind of goes forward in time, but a lot of the missing pieces are told in flashback. This is not an unusual storytelling device, but it is not done well here. Big gaps are left out of the story until further down the line, but the reveal isn't done in a way that makes you sit up and realize that a major piece of the story has clicked into place. Many times I was left confused as to how the events mentioned matched up in time. (Is it shocking that Sanjay confronts Tara at the thrift store, or is that after her accident? Oh wait, it's before. Well then, is this confrontation a big deal or not? Does it affect her relationship with Bela? Probably not? No big deal then. Why was it part of the story at all?)
However, the most frustrating thing of all was that I really, really wanted to read about these characters, but the story was over before I could really get into them. This novel could have been twice as long and I would have read it happily. I had so many questions, namely about Savitri's mother, Durga, and Bela's relationship to Sanjay. Also, what was Bela's life like after her encounter with the magician? It's sort of hinted at, but I wanted details. Also, I loved Mrs Mehta, the feisty, lonely Indian widow that Tara cares for. Why was she never mentioned again? If I were editing this book I would ask Ms. Divakaruni to write the novel again, and to please not rush this time.
Also, this tiny nitpick keeps niggling at me: why were cell phones mentioned so many times in parts of the story that took place in 1998 to 2000? Granted, I was in high school then, and high school kids were not entitled to a phone the way they are now, but I feel like very few people had them then, and there was no such thing as voice mail. I can remember that my uncle had one because he was a doctor, but I don't recall being able to leave messages for him on the phone. There was absolutely no such thing as having only a cell phone in 1998 -- if you had a cell, you had a landline because cell phones were considered somewhat unnecessary luxury items. And one of the characters sends a text message in 2000, which I feel was very early to be texting. I remember beginning to text in 2003, because that's what my friends in California were starting to do, but it was so new and unusual that a lot of people didn't bother to respond; they just called me. It just strikes me as unreal that a character in Texas in 2000 has a cell phone, and that his older, undocumented immigrant neighbor, who has no money, also has a cell phone, and that this Texan character texts this older neighbor. As I write this I am even more aware of how ludicrous that sounds. Another example of the poor editing of this novel.
I give it two stars only because I truly loved the characters, and the bones of the story, and I wish they had been given a better book. Otherwise this is a one star read.