A good book for general informational/academic writing. The authors do a nice job breaking down various workshop ideas for students of all ages. The resources in the appendix are nice for teachers who are just getting started.
The organization of the book is smart and lends itself as a resource book that can be used during lesson planning and reflection. The "how to" examples and sample work are also nice scaffolds.
Not a lot of original ideas or approaches for instructors of writing who have been exposed to extensive research and popular instruction in academic writing. Once you've read a lot on writing most instructors find that there are a few basic frameworks for expository and argumentative writing. They may include a different angle on an approach, but if you look under the hood, the engine is pretty much the same in most of the vehicles. I found myself reminded of Nancy Atwell's writing workshops, Jeff Wilhelm's inquiry based units, exploratory approaches found in many science academies and the inclusion of the CORI model (just to name a few).
I did appreciate the authors discussion of the writing teacher's dilemma of giving structure and strategies to new writers without stifling their writing voice. In other word, what are the advantages (if any) to teaching the traditional 5 paragraph essay?
I agree with the authors thesis that there are times and places for highly structured writing approach. I have gone back and forth on this issue for the past four years. I have found that writers who struggle with organization of ideas and are uncertain of where to begin need a very basic structure. I think that the traditional (albeit highly templatized) 5 paragraph essay is useful. It is found EVERYWHERE in academics and struggling writers can take the information and transfer it to various content areas.