This was quite an interesting, if not very well-known true crime case. I googled Butch after I got done and did recognise his photos but I didn't recall anything else about it. We never really learn why the murders happened since nothing was stolen, there was no fighting nor a fracas preceding them, and, because we really don't know who killed the victims we'll probably never know what it was all about.
I found the writing pretty fractured as she often refers to grand jury meetings or this detention hearing or that particular courtcase, but just as asides, so you're not really sure where they fit in the timeline or grand scheme of things. So, for me, it made it all a bit baffling here and there.
I liked we got to hear from Scott at the end and learn as much as he managed to find out in latter years-that was a helpful addition. The family tree at the start was also very handy as there were a lot of kids in the family with a lot of different dads and I bookmarked it and referred back to it a lot !! When it started getting into all the legal stuff like ex post facto, etc. it became REALLY confusing to me, I have to say. I didn't really understand what all these things were and how they related to the case and I did start to glaze over a little with it all.
There were quite a lot of mistakes peppered throughout which annoyed me as well....apostrophes in the wrong places (especially writing Smiths' when it is properly written a lot as well so just sloppily edited), nunchukas written not nunchucks, words dropped from sentences quite a lot, hyphens missed then knifes written and not knives, yet it was correct when written twice more on the same page !!
When looking the case up online I could find very little about it at all, I must say, which is odd. I doubt that now we'll ever have a resolution since, at time of my writing here, it's been 43 years !!