I listened to this audiobook on Audible, a subsidiary of Amazon, on my Apple iPhone and uploaded the review on GoodReads, a subsidiary of Amazon as well as Facebook and Insta owned by Meta. Thus providing the point of this book
People would speak of my grandfather's generation like this: "He lived in a time before automobiles." People will speak of my generation like this: "He lived in a time before big data."
Smith & Telang take us back in time when the major labels controlled everything whether it was music giants like EMI, Capital or RCA or film & screen juggernauts RKO, MGM, or TCF. Without a big backer, most media never made it in front of eyes.
“The majors in all creative industries operated like venture capitalists. They made a series of risky investments, full aware that most would fail, but that some would result in big payoffs that would more than cover the losses on unsuccessful artists. “
For a long time, all the power was in the hands of a few people with clout on top
Using the rise and fall of the Encyclopedia Britannica as a bellwether of things to come our authors prognosticate what’s coming, “The entertainment industries are facing a perfect storm of change: technological change- in the form of long tail markets, digital piracy, artists increase control over content creation & distribution. The increased power of distributors and the power of data-driven marketing present the industry with a set of threats similar to what Brittanica faced. These threats include a new set of processes for delivering value to consumers, new business models for capturing this value and difficult trade-offs incumbent firms must make between protecting established businesses and exploiting new opportunities. Ultimately there is an even greater threat, new distributors that play increasingly active role in the creation of entertainment content and the control actual customer data to bend market power.”
Enter Netflix. In March of 2011 ScreenRant published an article saying, “Well that was unexpected. DVD rental and online streaming giant Netflix has purchased the rights to David Fincher's newest TV series, House Of Cards. The implications for the future of television are massive. Internet distribution has been threatening to eat away at cable providers for years, but this marks the first time that a major series will be exclusively shown online.”
The creators of the US version of House of Cards knew they had a blockbuster: tight writing, gritty characters, (a pre-predator) Kevin Spacey they pitched it everywhere. But t none of the networks they approached wanted to take the risk of funding a pilot because according to conventional wisdom in the industry, political dramas were not successful. But the streaming service Netflix had data on rentals since it’s inception in 1997 with over 33 million users. What they realized was people like Kevin Spacey, people raved about the director David Fincher and even in America, the original BBC series was popular.
Armed with these facts Netflix skipped the standard pilot offering and paid $100 million upfront for 2 seasons.
While the industry insiders smeared it, House of Cards was unassailable well made and well received. From critics to audiences the implications were clear.
Our book demonstrates the role that data now play in entertainment industry decision-making — Netflix was even able to produce several trailers targeted at its various audience categories. Targeting is the magic word.
Without a doubt, the balance of power is shifting away from film, TV and music businesses, traditionally the biggest and most powerful, towards such entities as Netflix, Meta and Amazon — those that distribute content.
Streaming, Sharing, Stealing follows the history of film, TV and music industries, going back to the early 1900s tracking the developments of technology and how it is consumed has been ever-evolving.
The book, by two professors at Carnegie Mellon University, offers many lessons for executives in creative industries, as well as serving as a case study of the challenges faced by any industry grappling with disruptive forces. Written in 2016 some of it has come to pass and some of it is beginning to collapse, hello Netflix’s new ad tier.
There are great examples of people reacted quickly to adapt their businesses, and also warnings of wait-and-see executives who lost empires.
Sprinkling in some insane anecdotes: like how Blockbuster was offered to purchase Netflix for pennies on the dollar and turned them down preferring to make their own knock-off. We all know how that ended. Or how Amazon used mafia tactics to strong-arm small companies - it's a fascinating story
Perhaps my favorite story (which is well chronicled elsewhere) is Apple, which was struggling as Steve Jobs returned in 1997.
As someone who worked retail I understand this story. Jobs pinpointed the failure: Apple relied upon third parties to sell its computers and staff in those shops were often happier to recommend the cheaper products of competitors. He hunted out market and demographic data to show where Apple could build its own shops in the most convenient locations and sell directly to its customers — a strategy that went against the grain at the time. Though expected to close within 2 years, Apple sunk tons of money into not only an Apple store but an Apple experience. From layout to the questions the now-famous “geniuses” would encounter. Apple built loyalists with a loyal team that cut out the middleman leaving Best Buy, RadioShack, Microsoft, and the common thinking of the day in the dust.
The book also offers accounts of artists who can maximise what they earn and provide incentives that discourage piracy. The band Radiohead famously chose to bypass traditional music publishers when releasing their 2007 album In Rainbows. They made the tracks available right from their website for any price fans wished to pay, including nothing at all. It proved to be the band’s most profitable album at the time.
One network that learned a hard lesson about changing appetites was NBCUniversal in 2007, refusing to negotiate with Apple’s streaming service iTunes chose to remove its shows rather than empower video on demand. Viewers largely opted for piracy rather than following NBC to other digital outlets.
Truly the main point of Streaming, Sharing, Stealing highlights what the seasoned marketer has always known: the immense value of knowing your customer and delivering to them.
It’s never been easier to develop, create and deliver content than it is right now.
Weighing in on the new era Netflix had heralded, Kevin Spacey said, “Until now those of us in the TV & fi;lm business had to be able for the talent to find us. We had the keys to the kingdom & folks needed to bring us their stories if they wanted to find a route to an audience, but now things are changing, and changing fast.”
The tools to produce quality content has plummeted. Professional quality is attainable to the people who have talent not just the bank. Cinematographer Kieran Crilly won a 2014 Oscar for his movie The Lady in #6 with a Canon 5D Mark 3, which cost a few thousand dollars. The winners of the Academy Awards 2010 & 2011 for best film editing were both edited on Final Cut Pro, a software package available for about $300
Yet there are some who believe that the age of “gut instinct” and the “tastemaker” hasn’t passed. These studios and executives believe they are the gatekeepers of content. And they’ll probably be fired or out of business very soon.
The way to ensure your business survives is to be ready to adapt and take make decisions — just as Netflix did with its $100m bet on a series the industry said would fail.
The future seems to be streaming, letting people share experiences, without letting executives steal your joy.
Happy consuming.
If you like history and media, this book is perfect. It also offers some great transferable principles on leadership, vision, and flexibility. Setting a firm line on what is popular or acceptable right her, right now, one day will not be.
5/5