Some caveats before I get into the meat of this review:
1) I am a Christian and I knew this was Christian Fiction going in.
2) I usually hate this kind of Christian Romance fiction.
3) I received this as a gift and was repeatedly asked about it and therefore obligated to read it.
I'll start with the negative: this book was about what I expected. To me, Christian fiction seems to be one of two things: overwrought, symbolic fantasy 'for the teenagers', and overly sugary sweet romance 'for the women' (this also splits into the lesser 'don't worry about boys yet' genre 'for the teen girls'. Don't ask me to explain it.) This definitely falls into the overbearingly sentimental romance genre. It fills all the stereotypes and all the cliches.
None of the characters are particularly deep -- yet have supposedly deep faith -- and the relationships seem equally shallow. The premise is interesting, but hampered by holes in the plot. There are some things that are never really explained, for example: the purple man is I think supposed to be God? Daniel Ludlow rides a horse into a church and suffers no consequences? Nor does the horse have any difficulties with this? Emily stays with Philip up to the very end, even though he's cheating on her, with no real explanation other than he's hot?
This last point is the most difficult for me to swallow. Emily is strongwilled and says repeatedly that she a) doesn't want to be with someone who's not in love with her, and b) is in love with Daniel, not Philip. But Philip is hot and naturally the happy ending can't happen until the end, so she has to stay with Philip because it is the only way the plot works -- even though this is incongruous with her entire character. The author could have used a million other reasons for why a relationship between Daniel and Emily could not be, but instead they chose a very weak -- and frankly, uninteresting -- reason. This reason is such a weak plot device that it creates inconsistencies not only in Emily's character but also in the characters of her parents.
The other problem with Philip is that the novel sets him up as this huge cad for stepping out on his intended, and the problem is simply resolved with a few terse lines from Emily. She dismisses his infidelity and essentially gives him permission to be with Emmeline, so I suppose we are meant to assume that those two work out 'happily ever after' even though his parents have forbidden the relationship and threatened to disinherit him. But I suppose that just goes away once Emily has spoken. (On a side note, the disinheritance threat seems to come out of absolutely nowhere, like a deus ex machina). For a novel that's definitely trying to make a point about the sanctity of love, a complete failure to address infidelity seems counterproductive.
My other main concern with this novel is one that can be applied to (in my experience) this entire genre. Why do we, as Christians, produce so much fiction 'for women' that is exactly the same as regular romantic fiction, minus the sex and plus some lyrics from worship songs? Can't we do any better? Is there nothing else Christian women care about? This is the 21st century, and Christian fiction still acts like women are only interested in getting married and having children, which is not even Biblical (both Jesus and Paul say it's better to stay single if you can so don't tell me it's our 'job' as Christians to have babies). For that matter, why is getting married and having children treated as the ultimate goal for all Christians, regardless of gender? Tim has to give up his unreligious love of motocross to be truly devoted to Charlotte and raise a family. I don't buy that. As a Christian, there is nothing we should love more than God, and we should definitely love each other more than things or hobbies, and I think the author wants us to think Tim gives up motocross for God, but that's not what the plot or the characters actually say: they make it seem like he gives it up to get Charlotte back; it doesn't feel like it has anything to do with God at all.
I think the criticisms I've seen from non-Christians on this book, that it's too preachy or that all the characters have the same viewpoint because they're all Christian are somewhat valid points. The problem for me when reading Christian fiction (I haven't read a lot, mind you, because most of it sucks) is that everyone's faith seems too easy. I think a lot of us Christians can live in a vacuum: sure, we interact with non-Christians at work and out in public, but for a lot of us, religion is a family affair, and a lot of our close friends are also religious. To that end, the complaint that every character in this book is a Christian is pretty invalid: this is the reality for a lot of Christians. As human beings, we gravitate towards people who think like us because we share commonalities and understand each others goals. It's a lot easier for a Christian to understand wanting to follow God and the Bible than a non-Christian who doesn't have the same background knowledge. That said, however, no one in this genre really seems to struggle with their faith, which is a very real thing that happens to Christians all the time. Once in my life, I'd like to see a real, down to earth approach to Christian fiction. Sure, there are times in our faith journeys that can only be described in cheesy, Christian-ese terms, but there's also parts that are dark and angry, where we rail and yell at God sometimes. I feel that this type of novel is only useful to a generally content Christian because its lacking realism. It's not going to push you to go outside your comfort zone, it's not going to make you feel like you've been in the same rock-bottom valley as the characters, it's just nice and everything works out nice because God's in control. But I think it's dishonest as Christians to assume that everything will always be our definition of good, just because God's in control: 'everything works together for good', but that's according to God, and I think a lot of the time we're not honest about the fact that that 'good for God and His plan for the world' is not the same as 'good for us'.
One final pet peeve: would it have killed the author to describe someone as something other than 'gorgeous' for once? I swear the word is on every page. And if it's not, then we have to hear about 'Tim's handsome face' or 'Daniel's silky brown hair and soft eyes' or 'Emily's perfect figure' or how she's the most beautiful girl in Birmingham. We get it, they're hot. Do we really need to be reminded on every. single. page.
The pros: there aren't a lot, but I think some of the cons can also double as pros. I'm not going to lie, I would have enjoyed this book a lot more if I had realized going in how much of a suspension of disbelief it would require. I think a lot of Christian fiction goes for a realism approach (which usually doesn't work because as I said, it usually ISN'T realistic) and I shouldn't have expected that with this. That said, I don't think unrealistic storytelling is a con. If it was, fantasy as a genre wouldn't be nearly so popular. So if you're willing to take this with a huge helping of salt, you can handle the more outlandish parts of the plot.
I also appreciated the places where the novel WAS realistic, though those moments were pretty minor and overall insignificant. I appreciate the fact that the characters watch secular television or enjoy secular music, because, let's face it, a lot of us prefer the popular over the sacred when it comes to entertainment. I also appreciate that Charlotte mentions listening to both Michael Buble and Jesus Culture, because I think a lot of Christians have a music library that's a whole mess of secular and religious. I also found it refreshing that it doesn't demonize the secular choices. However, this is like......a one paragraph blip.
I did not appreciate being beat over the head with the 'no sex before marriage' commandment -- it was obvious through the characters actions and could have been merely shown, rather than told, especially since this is intended for Christian audiences (like??? we already know???). It would have improved the quality of writing a lot. But that said, I do appreciate Emily's blatant jab at rape culture, short-lived though it is. I think Christians can be incredibly Victorian in their approach to sex and absolutely refuse to talk about it, rather than acknowledging that talking about it can actually be healthy and helpful, especially considering how many rules we have about it.
The main pro is, however, the fact that it's just a feel-good book. If this is the genre you're into, then this book is great for you. I know I said earlier that the Christian tendency to paint everything as 'good' (again, our human definition of good) belies the fact that God's 'good' is not always our 'good'. But I also think there is a time and place to simply be reminded of God's love for us, and that he does send some of us incredible blessings sometimes, and storytelling is one of the best ways to share that reminder. I just wish us Christian women had a better medium for it than the seemingly endless stream of incredibly similar romance novels that keep appearing on the shelves of Christian bookstores. Romance and hot husbands aren't the only blessings God gives us.
Overall, I didn't hate it as much as I though I would, but it does suffer from a weak combination of plotting and characterization, inconsistent characterization, and it uses every single genre cliche it possibly can. But cliches aren't all bad all the time, and if Christian romance is your thing, read this novel.