Contemporary American poetry has plenty to offer new readers, and plenty more for those who already follow it. Yet its difficulty and sheer variety leaves many readers puzzled or overwhelmed. The critic, scholar, and poet Stephen Burt sets out to help. Beginning in the early 1980s, where critical consensus ends, Burt canvasses American poetry of the past four decades, from the headline-making urgency of Claudia Rankine s Citizen to the stark pathos of Louise Gluck, the limitless energy of Juan Felipe Herrera, and the erotic provocations of D. A. Powell.
The Poem Is You: Sixty Contemporary American Poems and How to Read Them is a guide to the diverse magnificences of American poetry today. It presents a wide range of poems selected by Burt for this volume, each accompanied by an original essay explaining how a given poem works, why it matters, and how the poem speaks to other parts of art and culture. Included here are some classroom classics (by Ashbery, Komunyakaa, Hass), less famous poems by very famous poets (Gluck, Kay Ryan), and poems by prizewinning poets near the start of their careers (such as Brandon Som), and by others who are not or not yet well known.
The Poem Is You will appeal to poets, teachers, and students, but it is intended especially for readers who want to learn more about contemporary American poetry but who have not known where or how to start. It describes what American poets have fashioned for one another, and what they can give us today.
I write books about poetry, essays on other people’s poems, books of my own poems, and shorter pieces about poems, poets, poetry, comics, science-fiction writers, political controversies, obscure pop groups, and the WNBA.
My published books are: Close Calls With Nonsense: Reading New Poetry (Graywolf, Spring 2009), The Forms of Youth: Adolescence and 20th Century Poetry (Columbia University Press, 2007), Parallel Play: Poems (Graywolf, 2006), Randall Jarrell on W. H. Auden (editor with Hannah Brooks-Motl, Columbia University Press, 2005), Randall Jarrell and His Age (Columbia University Press, 2002), and Popular Music: Poems (Center for Literary Publishing, 1999).
I am an Associate Professor of English at Harvard University. Prior to joining the faculty at Harvard, I spent several years at Macalester College, first as an Assistant Professor, then as an Associate Professor and Chair of the Department of English. I received my Ph.D. in English from Yale University in 2000, my A.B. from Harvard in 1994.
Absolutely one of the best books ABOUT poetry I have ever read. I read a TON of poetry and Burt still introduced me to some fabulous poets who had apparently been flying under my radar all these years. It's a great joy to see such a flexible, acute mind at work!
An excellent book of poetry on contemporary American poets and the various poetic movements that have come to the fore since 1980. Some of the poets selected by Stephen Burt seemed chosen by a professor of English (or Poetry) at Harvard, i.e., way more academic than many readers wanting to connect with contemporary poetry, but one can't admonish Stephen Burt for the effort he has gone through to make this book informative and meaningful. I enjoyed reading each and every poem as Burt arranged them and, after following up with his commentary, returning to the poem for a second or third or more reading. (Even now, I have gone back to revisit a poem from his selection.) To be honest, some of the poems would have made no sense without his insight, others seems a little too, too precious to be on a list I might compile, but overall, I liked comparing my limited interpretation with his expertise. All in all a fun read and an enjoyable exercise in reading, studying, and just thinking about excellent contemporary poetry. What a great job Burt must have!
There are so many lovely contemporary poems in this book and I enjoyed identifying poets who I am excited to get to know better in the future. Also enjoyed learning about their careers and lives a bit. I got very tired of the analysis of each poem -- I don't want a professor to tell me how to interpret a poem before I've had time to digest it. I ended up skimming all the analyses by the end.
If you want to study poetry for the first time like me, don't start with contemporary poems. I would not have understood anything without Stephanie's commentaries. Here are my favorite poems from this anthology:
"The Ride" by Richard Wilbur "Epigraph" by Allan Peterson "Nature" by Rae Armantrout "Moab" by Donald Revell "The Blue Terrance" by Terrance Hayes "Date: Post Glacial" by Dg Nanouk Okpik "Class" by Rose Alcala "Hide-and-Seek with God" by Brenda Shaughnessy "Oulipo" by Brandon Som
I had a lot of feelings about this book. I think it's a good concept with a laudable goal: to make contemporary poetry more approachable. The execution has some real problems. In fact, I would say the execution makes contemporary poetry seem less approachable than ever.
If we took the book as a sincere illustration of "How to Read" contemporary poems, then every contemporary poem would require roughly 15 paragraphs of explanation to fully appreciate. Burt's essays on each of these poems are about the same length: four pages, regardless of the length of the poem. (Even the one-line poem "oh he got a shoe from the waves" gets this treatment. I must be really stingy to think it deserves less.)
It's not just that these essays are too long. A bigger problem is that they are too similar for poems that differ widely. The sameyness of the explanation--the length, the mildly to effusively appreciative tone, the just-so conclusions--does a disservice to the poems and to the reader, who, if they're like me, ends up slogging through the essays to get to the next poem.
The book would more accurately be titled "The Poem is Stephen Burt." The author often seems to be brandishing his knowledge rather than inviting readers into the poems. And the writing is sometimes sloppy. Of Terrance Hayes' "The Blue Terrance," he says "these sixty-nine lines also belong to a larger set." The poem in question clearly has 39 lines. Quite the margin of error there. In his essay on Ross Gay's "Weeping," he refers to "precise" and "tiny" as "adverbs." I suppose mistakes like this will slip through when there is just so much prose to edit.
It's a shame, because the 60 poems in the collection are, with a few exceptions, really, really good. And Burt clearly does love poetry. In that ridiculously long essay on the one-line poem, he says, "We go to a poem, or to poets or to schools of poetry, not as we show up for a standardized test but as we go to the beach." That's just the right attitude. Unfortunately, with his highly standardized approach to each poem, he doesn't practice what he preaches.
This is a collection of 60 contemporary poems, each accompanied by a Stephen Burt essay explaining "how a given poem works, why it matters, and how the poem speaks to other parts of art and culture." I loved the essays. Except for a handful, I didn't care for the poems.
Really rewarding reading experience! It took me forever to get through - poetry is so hard! But I loved many of the poems and found the essays analyzing them extraordinary. I am amazed by the depth in the poems - the interesting use of language, the commentary on poetry itself, the references, the interesting perspectives on the world - I wouldn't have picked up on half of it without the essays.
Top poems in no particular order: - tito madera smith, Tato Laviera - Saxophone, Liam Rector - Facing It, Yusef Komunyakaa - Domestic Mysticism, Lucie Brock-Broido - Haylley's Comet, Stanley Kunitz - Our Lady of the Snow's, Robert Hass - [when he comes he is neither sun nor shade: a china doll], D.A. Powell - Oversized T-Shirts, Gabby Bess
Read this for school- an intermediate poetry workshop. Honestly, I only read some of the actual critiques/ analysis, but I read all the poems.
I thought this book was a cool concept. It introduced me to new poets and new styles of writing. I think it serves as a good introduction to American poetry, but could also be a desirable read for people who have already read a lot of poetry.
Some of the poems I did not like, some I loved. I found the critiques kind of long and sometimes pretty boring and repetitive (why I did not end up reading many of them).
Overall, I'm happy my professor assigned this book, but I am not sure I would have read it outside of class.
A helpful reference book that contains the text of sixty poems arranged chronologically from 1981 to 2015. The author discusses each poem in a 3-5 page essay, describing poetic techniques used, placing the poem and/or the poet within larger literary movements, and mentioning the poet's literary influences and followers. Informative, fascinating, and a must-have source for anyone who wishes to better understand contemporary American poetry.
I read this book hoping to develop a taste and appreciation for modern poetry.
Perhaps I don't try hard enough, I've thought, but after reading this book, I'm convinced modern poetry is not meant to be understood in a casual setting.
Stephen Burt's knowledge covering so many topics is truly impressive as he guides the reader through the maze that would otherwise remain a kluge of confusion.
I'm glad I stumbled across this book at the local library and recommend it highly.
I love the way Burt discusses each of the 60 poems first published between 1981-2016. He poses questions implied by the poems, presents possible answers and gives in depth background information about the poets.
I thoroughly enjoyed this read, both the poems were incredible, and the content was phenomenal. it's very well-written, and the poems are EXPLAINED IN SUCH DETAIL. if you are like me, and find it so difficult to understand and analyze certain poems, read this.
I'm a complete novice with poetry so this was a wonderful start to dip my toes into several decades of American poetry. Burt's essay on each poem and its author were wonderful teaching tools, helping to understand the more difficult poems, appreciate the structural beauty that I was unaware of, and give background on what informed the poem itself in the author's life, world politics, and the poet scene. Definitely introduced me to some poems and poets that I thoroughly enjoy and appreciate, and plan on reading more of.
"Since nobody reads poems, we are reminded often enough, it’s better, the editors assume, to knock down than put up fences. Predictably so, Stephen Burt, the noted poet and Harvard professor, apologizes for not being more inclusive, too, but he really shouldn’t. Despite its limited scope and explicit preference for work championed by the editor himself, this is the best anthology of American poetry out there." - Piotr Florczyk
This book was reviewed in the May 2017 issue of World Literature Today magazine. Read the full review by visiting our website: https://www.worldliteraturetoday.org/...
This book is in the subcategory of "taking my sweet time with it." Some books you fly through, others, you read like a normal human. And some, you study, very carefully and very slowly.